Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Vladimir Kramnik vs Junior (Computer)
Dortmund Sparkassen (2000), Dortmund GER, rd 5, Jul-12
Queen Pawn Game: Stonewall Attack (D00)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 40 times; par: 56 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 3,060 more games of Kramnik
sac: 30.Qxh7+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-20-04  azaris: Fantastic demonstration from Kramnik! After 14. ♕h2 Black has nothing to do so Junior first shuffles the king, throws away the outposted knight and then gobbles the offered pawn, unleashing a massive attack down the h-file. Score one for the humans.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: Too bad Jr. did not allow 33...Bxg5 34.Rc7. Its kind of pretty White rook has the bishop and knight both on a leash.
Sep-03-04  Knight13: Kramnik knows that 1.d5 2.e3 3.f4 is a good way to beat computer. If the black King Castle king side, he pushes pawn on the kig side. I always do that to beat my computer. Good game.
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I have noticed that if you don't castle it confuses computers; they don't seem to know what to do.

If you notice, Kramnik plays the fairly late 21.0-0-0, and only then does Junior play 21...a5 and 22...b5. The game is over by then!

Sep-04-04  Mostolesdude: I never thought about that offramp, I have to try it against my program ;)
Jun-09-05  acdc: <<offramp>: I have noticed that if you don't castle it confuses computers; they don't seem to know what to do. If you notice, Kramnik plays the fairly late 21.0-0-0, and only then does Junior play 21...a5 and 22...b5. The game is over by then!>

Interesting anti-computer idea. I will try that too. What do you think the reason for this oddity is? Does the computer get confused because it does not know which side of the board to commit its pieces to?

Jun-09-05  Medusa: I agree with the idea of avoid castling, see this other game

Kasparov vs X3D Fritz, 2003

Jul-12-05  fgh: "Junior Kramnik". Serious pun potential.
Jul-12-05  sharpnova: <acdc> i believe that is the correct reason. it is why i try to delay castling as long as possible against computers..
Aug-29-05  SnoopDogg: Kingside attacks are very difficult even today to defend for computers. This is a clear example.
Sep-15-05  Runemaster: I seem to remember somewhere on this site discussion of a player (not Arno Nickel) who claimed excellent results against computers with the sort of technique we see here from Kramnik.

Computers seem to find it hard to visualise the consequences of allowing the 'h' file to be opened onto their castled king, even if they gain a piece by doing so. The mating attack is evidently beyond their 'horizon', although perhaps now the strongest computers like Hydra don't have these sorts of weaknesses.

Apr-13-07  argishti: What a sharp game by kramnik!! he crushed the machine.
May-28-09  WhiteRook48: very well played by Kramnik
Jun-10-09  SirChrislov: <Runemaster post from '05>:

I think you're reffering to: Ernest F Pecci

Jun-10-09  SirChrislov: Pecci, in his book 'A psychiatrist matches wits with fritz' refers to this set-up with 4.f4 as the "barrage position." quite effective.
Jun-10-09  Kinghunt: This is just the Stonewall. It worked well enough here, but overall I don't think it's suitable for high level play. I don't think you would ever find this played in say, a world championship match.
Aug-04-09  WhiteRook48: 2 e3 was kind of stupid
Mar-24-10  birthtimes: Why not play this in a world championship match?! A human would most likely not defend as well as a strong computer...and probably not many grandmasters have read Pecci's book, except Kasparov...
Mar-24-10  Alphastar: <birthtimes> because the computer totally misplayed the (late) opening in this game, by castling kingside and then locking the center completely, thus inviting a huge kingside attack by white. In fact I would say that after 10. Rg1, the position is already won for white in a strategic sense.

Even a master wouldn't make such large positional mistakes in the opening.. And this is ofcourse a typical anti-computer opening.

Mar-24-10  birthtimes: Yes, this is a typical anti-computer opening, however, if Black, a human, does play the natural and normal book move ...c5, I don't think it would be particularly wise to also castle long, especially if one additionally wants to exchange the pawn on c5 for the d4 pawn.

Even more critical, is that in this database, there are only 28 games listed from 1893-2008, after 1. d4 d5 2. e3 Nf6 3. Bd3 e6 4. f4!

So this suggests that there just haven't been enough games played by humans to really evaluate how good of a strategy that these anti-computer moves would be when played solely by humans.

Perhaps another Bronstein will soon appear on the horizon, and after reading Dr. Pecci's book, and studying this game by Kramnik and similar ones by Kasparov, will be able to adapt them not only to computer logic, but also to human logic...

Mar-24-10  birthtimes: Here is another human vs. computer Stonewall game that is played more "humanly" by the computer, and yet eventually White's kingside attack breaks through again to victory...

Yusupov vs REBEL, 1997

Mar-25-10  birthtimes: And here's yet another famous game of grandmaster vs. machine in a Bird/Stonewall type setup with wonderful annotations and revealing glimpses into a grandmaster's mind...

B Alterman vs Deep Fritz, 2000

Premium Chessgames Member
  juan31: Buena onda que un Gran Maestro gane a un programa, quiere decir que a pesar que el programa pueda "pensar" miles de jugadas en segundos, el cerebro de un Maestro sigue siendo superior Gracias Maestro Kramnik
Jun-23-17  Nova: Is this Kramnik's famous Stonewall beats computer game??

If so this should be a GOTD! Pun suggestions? "Stonewall Kramnik"

Jan-23-18  RookFile: The immortal rookfile game! lol
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Queen Pawn Game: Stonewall Attack
from adichess' A00-D09 by adichess
Stonewall Attack, Stonewall Defense (D00) 1-0 Triple on h-file
from Headed to Holland Next Year with Fredthebear by fredthebear
Dortmund Sparkassen 2000
by Tabanus
vikinx's favorite games
by vikinx
GM vs Computer
by larrewl
Nice games and Masterpieces
by Queens Gambit
Stonewall Attack, Stonewall Defense (D00) 1-0 Triple on h-file
from Spearheads DE (Batteries involving the Queen) by fredthebear
Computer - GM games 1963-2002
by biglo
by genie9
something to think about
by tldr3
Round Five, Game #22
from Dortmund Sparkassen 2000 by suenteus po 147
Black's extra pawn did not stop White!
from Material Imbalances by vikinx
maxruen's favorite games
by maxruen
Kramnik's anti-computer strategy short circuits Deep Junior
from Uncommon Openings by BishopofBlunder
earmanhomimii's favorite games
by earmanhomimii

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC