chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

George Atwood vs François André Philidor
London (1794)
Queen's Gambit Accepted: Old Variation (D20)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 8 more G Atwood/Philidor games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-01-04  Ziggurat: 18. - 0-0 is a pretty bad blunder from Philidor. Luckily for him, Atwood counter-blunders later and returns the piece.
Jul-01-04  Jesuitic Calvinist: Yes, a bad blunder, but: Philidor was perhaps playing simultaneously and blindfold (as well as being almost 70).

I am glad someone else looks at Philidor's games - if possible, it would be nice to have some more on this site.

Sep-05-04  Knight13: Why not 29... Qxb2?
Sep-05-04  PizzatheHut: <Knight13><Why not 29...Qxb2?> If 29...Qxb2, then 30. Nxb2 and black loses his queen for a rook.
Sep-05-04  Knight13: <PizzatheHut> Ugh, I didn't see that Knight on d3! Dang!
Jul-13-05  sneaky pete: Philidor played blindfold, but he did see that Knight on d3!
Feb-20-09  WhiteRook48: aim at the Wood
Jul-26-09  just a kid: Give Philidor credit for his mistake.He was playing blindfolded.
Jul-27-10  1ADAM: Interesting draw, maybe 27.-Nxe5 is better
Oct-08-11  pawngrabber: Or maybe 27.Qh5
Nov-14-11  AnalyzeThis: White should prefer 4. Bxc4.
Sep-11-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: This QGA sticks out like a sore thumb in the late 19th century. Glad to see that some were willing to play something other than 1.e4 in bygone days.
Sep-11-12  sneaky pete: Isn't 1794 rather early for late 19th century?
Sep-11-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: All depends on one's point of view-I simply can't type!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Philidor
by Runemaster
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
from Game collection: 1 by gr2cae
Even three EACH!
from Worst Chess Games of All Time by Brit
64idi0t's_misc
by 64idi0t


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC