chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Daniel Stellwagen vs Igor Smirnov
Wch U16 (2002), Heraklio, rd 8, Nov-15
Russian Game: Cochrane Gambit. Center Variation (C42)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 543 more games of Stellwagen
sac: 4.Nxf7 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-28-04  Poisonpawns: Interseting line against the petroff, I must admit i have never seen it before. Is there a known refutation to this Knight sac or was black just unprepared?
Nov-28-04  PinkPanther: Topalov played it against Kramnik once, so it can't be THAT bad.
Nov-28-04  DanielBryant: This is the Cochrane gambit, it's at least 150 years old.
Nov-28-04  azaris: <Poisonpawns> 5...c5 is as close to the refutation you can get, but White will still have annoying central pawns to cram down Black's throat.
Nov-30-04  acirce: <Poisonpawns> It is refuted and Black plays the refutation. It is later on that he is outplayed. "Annotating by result" is a common error that even Kasparov does in the OMGP series.

This is of course not to say that it can never have practical value, let's say you're playing someone who uses the Petrov to avoid the kind of unbalanced positions he desperately hates. The trade-off of playing an objectively dubious line for getting your opponent into positions he doesn't like and understand may well be worth it.

Nov-30-04  AdrianP: http://www.schach.gmxhome.de/boofre...

is an extraordinarily detailed online analysis of the Cochrane Gambit (<patzer2> gave the link on another page).

Nov-30-04  acirce: <by Uwe Bekemann>

Funny seeing his name again; I played two correspondence games against him in a friendly match Sweden-Germany recently. If I'd known I'd have let him play it!

Nov-30-04  azaris: <http://www.schach.gmxhome.de/boofre...; That's an interesting resource, but I wouldn't necessarily agree with his choice for the "mainline" variation.
Nov-30-04  AdrianP: <azaris> Maybe, but I wouldn't argue with him either - it might take a while!
Nov-30-04  azaris: <AdrianP> Of course, the tried and true method of solving differences of opinion about lines between correspondes players is to play a game in that line. The loser then shuts up.

Hey, it worked for Estrin and Berliner (Estrin vs Berliner, 1965)!

Nov-30-04  AdrianP: By coincidence, I just played a blitz game which went as follows:

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nxe5 d6 4. Nxf7 Kxf7 5. d4 Nxe4? 6. Qh5+ Kg8?? 7. Qd5+ (with mate in 1) 1-0

I was White, fortunately...

Dec-01-04  Poisonpawns: <Azaris>: Great link for the cochrane gambit in the petroff i will definately try this out over the board.
Dec-01-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: That link shows how perfect html is for openings manuals.
Dec-01-04  azaris: <offramp> I still prefer going through opening variations in a tree-like fashion la Scid or the Opening Explorer.
Jun-24-05  bomb the bishop: <AdrianP> thanks for the link, however the main line is not 5..g6 as stated on the webpage but rather 5...c5 so If anyone knows another link where 5..c5 is discussed I would appreciate it if you could post the adress
Nov-24-07  newzild: I've been playing Cochrane's 3.Nxf7 Gambit against the Petroff for years, after seeing an analysis by Bronstein. He considered it playable, and tried it a few times in casual/blitz games. My own results are somewhat mixed. An interesting trick pointed out by Bronstein is 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 d6 4.Nxf7 Kxf7 5.d4 Nxe4?! 6.Qh5 ch Ke7 (instead of Kg8?? as AdrianP points out below) 7.Qe2! and white recovers the knight with an extra pawn.
Dec-09-10  Everett: <acirce> Refuted? Where exactly did black go wrong then?
Aug-31-18  Saniyat24: nice finish...!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Russian Game: Cochrane Gambit. Center Var (C42) 1-0 Up 3 pawns
from Phillies Open Flame Games by fredthebear
Bc4+ after all!!
from Cochrane Gambit by Wookash
Russian Game: Cochrane Gambit. Center Var (C42) 1-0
from Russia Game by fredthebear
Cochrane Gambit
from nikkiurbz's favorite games by nikkiurbz
000_-> Middlegames Opp col Bishops 2
by whiteshark
Russian Game: Cochrane Gambit. Center Variation
from COCHRANE GAMBIT by gambitfan
r8
from 2002 WYCC (open) U-16 by gauer
DRAGONS
by napostol


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC