chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Cecil Valentine De Vere vs Wilhelm Steinitz
Informal Game (1864), London, England
Italian Game: Classical Variation. Albin Gambit (C53)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 21 more De Vere/Steinitz games
sac: 21...d4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: At the top of the page we display the common English name for the opening, followed by the ECO code (e.g. "C53"). The ECO codes are links that take you to opening pages.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-02-08  Peter Wells: Not sure if anyone can hear me, this is my first post. I don't understand why Steinitz felt it was safe to take the night at g5 with 14 ... Bxg5. Isn't that triggering the very trap De Vere set? I see:

15. Qxf8+ Kd7 (forced)
16. Qxd8+ Rxd8
17. Bxg5

and white is up a clear rook with his bishop at g5 threatening the black rook on d8. And if instead of 16. ... Rxd8 it was 16 ... Kxd8 (one of these two moves is forced), then 17. Bxg5+ and white is still up that rook. From here on out, I just don't see any huge attack or positional win for Black that compensates.

I'm only a B player at best, and out of practice. But not only did Steinitz accept he trap, De Vere didn't go ahead with it, instead backing off with a simple exchange and went on to lose.

What am I missing? Thanks.

--Peter
peter@tunecore.com

Jan-02-08  drmariogodrob: On move 11, even, there is really no reason for white not to play 11. Qxc4. Speaking from the perspective of someone who has thrown away many games because I saw ghosts, I wouldn't be surprised if M. De Vere simply couldn't believe that he had beaten Steinitz, and so didn't believe it.
Jan-02-08  MichAdams: Not the great British GM, Peter Wells?

<I'm only a B player at best...>

Probably not.

Jan-02-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  The Long Diagonal: Peter Wells <And if instead of 16. ... Rxd8 it was 16 ... Kxd8 (one of these two moves is forced), then 17. Bxg5+ and white is still up that rook.>

What you missed was 16. ... Bxd8 after which white has won the exchange but black has one pawn more, better development and bishop pair. I guess I'd prefer being black here.

Jan-02-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: <Peter Wells> Welcome to the site. =)

After 15. Qxf8+ Kd7 16. Qxd8+ Black has 16 ... Bxd8 saving the piece, leaving White up the exchange for a Pawn, yet this line would be a huge improvement over the game continuation.

It is unclear how seriously to take this "Informal Game" as 11. Qxc4 gives White a piece for two Pawns and even better chances than 11. Qxg7.

See you around. =)

Jan-02-08  Peter Wells: Ack! You're right! The bishop takes. I did miss it.

I know of Peter Wells, the British IM. Nope, not him! I managed a USCF in the 1600s for a while, but as you can see, I'm no master of analysis.

I've actually been going through almost every single game since the database starts up through the year 1900. It's quite the journey! I read your comments, I already know most of you, it feels like. :)

Thanks!

--Peter
peter@tunecore.com

Jan-13-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: It's not even clear, apparently, whether this was played in 1864 or '65.
Jan-13-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: http://www.chesscafe.com/kibitz/kib...
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
1-ig-eco53
by classicalwin2
Italian Game: Classical. Albin Gambit (C53) 0-1 Informal
from Italiano Job c3d4s Mobbed Fredthebear by fredthebear
The Dark Side
by lonchaney


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC