chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

David Przepiorka vs Richard Reti
San Remo (1911), Sanremo ITA, Feb-??
Spanish Game: Berlin Defense. Hedgehog Variation (C66)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Przepiorka/Reti games
sac: 23...Qxg2+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: At the top of the page we display the common English name for the opening, followed by the ECO code (e.g. "C66"). The ECO codes are links that take you to opening pages.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-15-04  drjimmy42: I caught the Q sac + K fork to pick up the bishop but I don't see how this is a definitive "win" for black. Yes, the White king is way out on his own, but white is still up ( a minor piece - 1 pawn ) and I don't see any killer moves for black. So what comes next?
Sep-15-04  FryGuy1013: Black has a rook and two pawns versus an extra knight.. A pretty definitive advantage.
Sep-15-04  Tiamat: <drjimmy42> How is white up a piece? The point value system that I know of, Pawn = 1, Knight & Bishop = 3, Rook = 5

Black:23
White:19

Black has 2 rooks while white has 1, a major advantage and black has two more pawns, and white's king is in the middle of the game.

If I'm correct, Remo didn't think he could win from a position that low.

Sep-15-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  crafty: 26. ♘xc6 bxc6 27. ♗a3 ♘xc5 28. ♗xc5 dxc5   (eval -4.39; depth 16 ply; 500M nodes)
Sep-15-04  ConLaMismaMano: At first i saw something like 23...Bxe4 24.Nxe4 Rxe4 25.Qxe4 Nf4 26.Qc2 (Here i thought i was getting no where, so i stopped analysing). Then i realised which was the real solution.
Sep-15-04  erikcu: Really black is soon to be up 3 pawns. White is forked on this move, and the one pawn is hanging in the wind.
Sep-15-04  erikcu: Now that I look at the game this combination seemed to have started from 21... Bxg3. It seems like todays puzzle could have been called "23. black to play and not lose." since he is down a major piece from the bishop pawn trade at 21. black needs to sac the queen for a fork.
Sep-15-04  sandyobrien: saw the queen sac and fork almost instantly
Sep-15-04  kaptajn4: Got it instantly!
Sep-15-04  Hinchliffe: Sorry to gloat ..no not really but this one was very simple. Still it is rather nice to start the day cracking a chess puzzle.
Sep-15-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Tiamat> Your understanding of the value of the pieces is essentially correct (though the values can change considerably based on positional considerations). In this case, the combination changes the balance from a situation where Black has a Rook and two Pawns (5+2=7) for two pieces (6) for a +1 advantage (7-6=1)to a situation where he wins a clear piece (+3). With the combination, Black goes from a piece down with compensation (+1) to winning a piece (+3). So, adding the +1 and +3 advantages, Black is up +4.

Another way to view it is that after the combination Black has a two pawn advantage (+2) and is now a solid exchange up (+2). So you add the +2 extra pawns to the +2 exchange up for a +4 advantage. Adding a small value for the initiative and a space advantage, Crafty makes it 4.39. Since one piece up is +3, then Black at +4 is more than a piece up.

Sep-15-04  ThomYorke: What if 17) g3 ?
Sep-15-04  Marco65: <ThomYorke> I think 17. g3 Nxe1! 18. gxh4 Nxf3+
Sep-15-04  Marco65: Most GM and computer chess experts give bishops and knights more than 3 points, 3.25 or 3.5. In fact you normally don't trade a knight and a bishop for a rook + a pawn.
Sep-15-04  alexandrovm: It's a Queen sac with double attack. 23. ... Qxg2 24. KxQ (only move) Nf4+ 25. whatever move and Nxd3
Sep-15-04  lnlver: Black is going to win another pawn, and will have decisive kings side and queens side pawn advantages.

There shouldn't be any problem winning this game. I'd take it every day.

Sep-15-04  Mistereous1: Saw the queen sack as the best move, but dismissed it looking for a mating attack...guess I have to remember not all of these puzzles lead to mate.
Sep-15-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: I goofed this one-looking for the mate,instead of the fork. MY bad.
Sep-15-04  Zaius: I was looking for the mate too.
Sep-15-04  rclb: We had a whole week of this kind of thing not long ago. Pretty easy if you know what you're looking for. This was more of a Monday puzzle I think!
Sep-15-04  notyetagm: 23 ... ♕xg2+! 24 ♔xg2 ♘f4+ 25 ♔ moves ♘xd3 Black is up an exchange and 2 pawns
Sep-15-04  Knight13: My moves are close.
Sep-15-04  Giancarlo: Didn't get this one till I realised it was Black to move and not white. :-)
Sep-15-04  drjimmy42: <Tiamat> Didn't notice that white was missing the other rook. Sort of a large oversight.
Sep-12-08  just a kid: Sort of odd for Reti to put the bishop on e7 then move it to f8 to get to g7 to get a hedgehog formation.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
23...Qxg2+!
from Knight Forks by patzer2
Game 58
from Master Games - Chess (Tartakower/du Mont) by Jersey Joe
4-Ruy Lopez
by webbing1947
23...? (Wednesday, September 15)
from POTD Ruy Lopez by takchess
Lopez-steinitz from Tartakower's 500
by Partrick
G58 in '500 Master Games of Chess' by Dr. Tartakower & Du Mont
from yDecoy To-o, Deflection From, Remove Fredthebear by fredthebear
Game 58
from Master Games - Chess (Tartakower/du Mont) by Qindarka
4-Ruy Lopez
by classicalwin2
G58 in '500 Master Games of Chess' by Dr. Tartakower & Du Mont
from QThee Queen is Meaner Volume Three!?! by fredthebear
POD 9/15/4 23....?
from Game of the day. and/or puzzle of the day. by athyn
Game 58
from 500 Master Games of Chess by smarticecream
23...? (September 15, 2004)
from Wednesday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
Slick Combinations
by greystar69
4
from Veliki majstori saha 16 RETI (Petrovic) by Chessdreamer
Ruy L 0-1 gaffel
from xfer's favorite games 2006 by xfer


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC