chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Natalia Zhukova vs Alexander Areshchenko
73rd Ukrainian Championship (2004), Kharkiv UKR, rd 1, Aug-24
Modern Defense: Fianchetto. Azmaiparashvili Variation (A42)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more N Zhukova/Areshchenko game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Games that have been used in game collections will have a section at the bottom which shows collections which include it. For more information, see "What are Game Collections?" on our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-09-04  Knight13: Pawns are better than rooks in the end game. So both has 1 rook. That means it's gonna be a check or pawn kill.

Nice Drawn game.

Sep-09-04  Knezh: <Pawns are better than rooks in the end game> I am honestly sorry but what the heck are you talking about? What happens is that you flood the recent kibitzing list with your posts which are hard to make sense of. Please be more selective in kibitzing.. No personal offence meant!
Sep-09-04  themindset: yes, that made no sense.
Sep-10-04  grasser: He is only 13. I can attest that 3 connected pawns beat a rook. It depends on the position of course.
Sep-10-04  iron maiden: <grasser>, welcome to chessgames.com from all of us. Enjoy the site.
Sep-10-04  Knight13: I am talking about "2 pawns connected." Dose it make sence now?
Sep-10-04  Giancarlo: <knight13>

2 pawns connected is RARELY, and I mean like 1% of the time better then a rook.

Sep-10-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: The original kibitz was wrong on all levels. First, a Rook (5 points) is always superior to a Pawn (1 point), even in the endgame, with 2 exceptions = if that Pawn delivers mate on the move (where relative units have no meaning), or if that Pawn promotes to a Queen (9 points), at which point it's not a Pawn anymore. By experience and convention, 2 connected passed Pawns on the 6th Rank are considered equivalent to a Rook throughout the game (not just in the endgame) given such a duo's high potential for Queening. Second, if 28 ... Rxe4 then both players have 2 Rooks and 5 Pawns, a drawn endgame at their level with best play, therefore the comment "So both has 1 Rook" is irrelevant to this game and only serves to thoroughly confuse people. Third, "That means it's gonna be a check or pawn kill" is another one of those odd phrases that the poster may understand perfectly well yet nobody else here can comprehend, even in context, which comes across as complete nonsense. As far as this game itself, I found it fairly tame and average (read: boring) for master level, dead even throughout, but if anyone else thought it was a nice game, great.

Kibitzing is designed to improve understanding of that game and/or of chess itself, for both the poster and the reader, without making things worse. Now that makes sense.

Dec-19-06  farrooj: This page makes me laugh everytime I read it...
Jun-29-07  Chess Classics: Hehe, I finally understood Knight13's post for the first time. Sorry I'm a little slow, but that did make me chuckle when I figured it out...

Regards,
CC

Mar-19-08  positionalgenius: Great kibitzing here
Mar-19-08  ounos: Pawns are awful. I would capture my own if the rules allowed that. I usually try to entice my opponent to do this dirty and time-consuming work for me, while I shuffle my rooks around and do a "check or pawn kill", whichever comes first, ya know.
Mar-22-08  positionalgenius: Classic kibitzing here... makes me laugh every time
Sep-23-08  ToTheDeath: <Pawns are better than rooks in the end game. So both has 1 rook. That means it's gonna be a check or pawn kill.

Nice Drawn game.>

Best kibitz EVA.

Mar-31-09  WhiteRook48: why did white take the draw? He's a queen up
Aug-01-09  Xeroxx: She is a queen up.

Natalia is a girls name.

Oct-30-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I agree this is one of my favourite pages!
Oct-30-09  Mate Hunter: Epic thread... hopefully the original poster understood his own post!
Nov-04-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Having read <Knight13>'s comment and played over the game, I now support drug testing for chess kibitzers.
Nov-04-12  Shams: So *this* is the famous "pawns are better than rooks in the end game" game.

We have to note that <Knight13> was about thirteen years old when he made that post. It's enough to make me thank god I was a teenager in the pre-internet era.

Nov-04-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Only thing with any life, come to this game, was the original post and responses.
Mar-30-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Sep-09-04 Knight13: Pawns are better than rooks in the end game. So both has 1 rook. That means it's gonna be a check or pawn kill. Nice Drawn game.>

A great great post!

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collection[what is this?]
I won't bathe in the stable
from Rendezvous at Big Gulch by offramp

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC