chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mephisto (Automaton) vs NN
"Nobody's Business But the Turk's" (game of the day Oct-26-2017)
? (1883), London ENG
Scotch Game: Fraser Variation (C45)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Mephisto/NN game
sac: 25.Rxb7+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some people don't like to know the result of the game in advance. This can be done by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page, then checking "Don't show game results".

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-27-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: It may indeed have been 'Nobody's Business But the Turk's', but the Corleone Family settled accounts with Virgil Sollozzo, the executioner.
Nov-27-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <MJCB> -- < Looking at the date, curious that the Turk never played Philidor.> I can think of two possible reasons. One, Philidor spent much of his career in England, while the Turk was touring Europe. And two, they would have been in economic competition with one another: the Turk played exhibition games against princes and nobles, while Philidor made a living playing English aristos. There were no tournaments in those days, nor regular matches, and travel was difficult - so strong contemporaries often never met.
Nov-27-14  john barleycorn: 3. Possibility: Philidor spent to much time inside the turk.
Nov-27-14  MindCtrol9: 11....f5 brought all the problems.That Turk had a really good concept on how good was to have the pieces in action.Zanchin says that Turk was about 1800, and I don't think so.That guy was good.There was no elo at the time, but those people were strong players.
Nov-28-14  TheBish: <rich187113: The turk looks about 1800 Elo.>

I would say much higher. How many 1800 players have you seen play a game like this? Most would not even consider a double rook sacrifice, and therefore would not likely finish a game this way.

Nov-28-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <john barleycorn: 3. Possibility: Philidor spent to much time inside the turk.>

possibility 4: Philidor knew the difference between too and to.

Nov-28-14  john barleycorn: <thegoodanarchist: ...

possibility 4: Philidor knew the difference between too and to.>

That, too. :-)

Dec-01-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Brutal attack by the Turk...
Dec-16-14  Christoforus Polacco: probably better for black is 14... B:c6
Feb-22-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: vonKrolock: back in 2004 asks a couple times about this games authenticity.

The Turk vs NN, 1770 (kibitz #16)

I think he is right to question it. A Scotch Game in 1773, the Steinitz Variation...it is possible but Black is not too bad a player for the N.N. tag. certainly way above your usual 1700's N.N. fodder.

He develops, castles, gives back the pawn, He is still in the game on move 14 (when most N.N's by now have been mated) he starts to go astray with 14...Nxc6 lured by the developing tempo Bf8-c5+ and then got caught trying to exploit a pin.

But if that is not a good enough reason to doubt it how about....

On page 77 of 'The Chess Player's WeekEnd Book' by R. N. Coles (published 1950) the exact same game is given except White in that case is Mephisto (Automaton) operated by Isador Gunsberg and played in London in 1883.

I think the latter is the better candidate

Feb-24-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: "The Modern Chess Instructor" By Steinitz published 1889 has this game in it saying it was played by Mephisto and operated by Mr. Gunsberg.

it is looking very much like this game should go to Mephisto and be dated 1883.

Feb-24-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  vonKrolock: Sally Simpson: You solved the riddle! Gunsberg alias Mephisto anno 1883 - It was from start a matter of attribution; not of authenticity: thanks for the research.
Feb-24-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: vonKrolock

I am going to check with a higher authority, Steinitz may have got it wrong and R.N. Coles copied him though I think the game is too good for circa 1700 and this looks like the work of Gunsberg.

(unless Mephisto really was just a machine with nobody inside.)

Feb-27-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: The 'higher authority' has come through.

Tim Harding, John Saunders (Editor of CHESS) and Chess historian/author Hans Renette all expressing extreme doubts this was circa 1770 and finding the original source of 4...Qh4 in the Scotch.

George Walker in his 'New Treatise' (1841) states it was suggested by the London 1830's player Wellington Pulling (so now we know)

I think we should trust Steinitz and R.N. Coles on this one and give, as they say, the game to Mephisto (Automaton) with Isidor Gunsberg hiding inside.

Tartakower in his ''A Breviary of Chess " does not actually say this game was played in 1770 by the Turk. Though one can be forgiven for thinking this is what he means.

He gives a brief essay on Chess Automatons where he mentions the Turk and finishes it with this game.

Mar-01-17  Cibator: Amazed it was all of thirteen years before anyone noticed Mephisto was being confused with The Turk!
Mar-01-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Hi Cibaro,

vonKrolock had his doubts back in 2004. I stumbled here by accident and something in the 4...Qh4 variation (with 5.Nf3) made me seek out a game I had seen with this line. I hammered my chess library and eventually found it in the Weekend Chess Book by R.N.Coles.

From there and with a lot of help from my friends it has been rectified.

It must also be noted that C.G. themselves had their doubts (see note after move one).

The other good news it has unearthed 11 games played by Wellington Pulling who was often described as a brilliant amateur player from London.

I'm off to the Bio section to see what we can do with them.

May-13-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: 1770. The enigmatic NN comes out with a TN! 4...Qh4! A move which has not been refuted for 247 years.

One would think that in so old an opening as this, the Scotch, that TNs would be thin on the ground. But to my amazement a computer came up with a TN in this very line on <move 5>! Gandalf vs XINIX, 2001

Oct-26-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: The heading at the top of this page now says that White was Mephisto (Automaton), not The Turk (Automaton), so the pun no longer makes sense.
Oct-26-17  algete: N.N. nunca aprende
Oct-26-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Two rook sac wins this one!
Oct-26-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <vonKrolock> If you attribute the game to Mephisto and change the date from 1770 to 1883 that would make NN 113 years older. So you must admit that Black played very well for a player of such an advanced age!
Oct-26-17  RookFile: It's really quite a good game.
Oct-26-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheTamale: This NN, he could play a little chess this one, eh?
Jul-21-18  morfishine: But we all know that nobody, especially 'NN' had a chance against Pillsbury
Oct-28-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  OrangeTulip: Why they changed that name, I donít know, people just like it better that way...
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Scotch Qh4 Fraser 1-0 Who needs a computer to play great chess?
from Not Duct Tape, Not Beer, Not Irish Either by fredthebear
Nice attack by "computer" of the old days.
from MJCB likes those games by MJCB
Scotch Game: 4...Qh4 Fraser (C45) 1-0 Dbl R sacs, Q&N battery
from yKnights Add Spice V More Fredthebear Jive by fredthebear
scotch
from luigi's favorite games 1 by luigi
e4 scotch
from ahmedlook2000's favorite games by ahmedlook2000
"A Breviary of Chess" by Tartakower (1942)
from Short games by masters by rbaglini
A fantastic game from the cramped Schlumberger.
from Favorite Games by Isolated Pawn
25. Rxb7+!
from Deflection by patzer2
w28
from Checkmates 18+ by Kasputin
Beautiful
from TomekJanski's favorite games by TomekJanski
rook sacs
by obrit
chessmaster pro's favorite games
by chessmaster pro


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC