chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Karl Behting vs Aron Nimzowitsch
Corr Match Behting - Nimzowitsch (1911) (correspondence), corr, rd 1
Philidor Defense: Nimzowitsch. Klein Variation (C41)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more K Behting/Nimzowitsch games
sac: 23.Rg4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-06-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: A very pretty final combination by Behting, whose knight at e3 goes on to do great things. Perhaps this inspired Nimzowitsch to try Ne3 in this game, featured in <My System>: Nimzowitsch vs K Behting, 1919.
Feb-01-12  RookFile: Well, I'm "betting" that with 6.... c6, Nimzo might have put up tougher resistance.
Feb-01-12  sneaky pete:


click for larger view

You lose your bet. 6... c6 is a complete waste of time. After 7.Re1 .. (with in most cases Rxe4 .. next) white gets a fierce attack.

Schlechter recommends 6... Nf6 when after 7.Re1 Be7 8.Bd3 O-O black's game may be uncomfortable, but should be tenable.

Feb-01-12  RookFile: Hi Sneaky, I'm sure you must be right, but what happens after 6...c6 7. Re1 Qh4?

Maybe this is an omen not to bet on Super Bowl Sunday.

Feb-01-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Stunning. This reminds me of a game I played once (and loss).
Feb-01-12  rannewman: RookFile, your attack is lacking any real threat, and you try to launch it with all your pieces undeveloped and your king in the middle. 6...C6 7.Re1 Qh4 8.f3 and white should win easly.
Feb-01-12  RookFile: The first point is that I'm not using a computer. My chess skills are rusty, and I'm trying to do analysis the old fashioned way.

Qh4 is really a defensive move. We need to understand what Sneaky Pete was saying. He was saying that after 6....c6 7. Re1, if black plays something like 7.... Be6, then 8. Rxe4 dxe4 9. Bxe6 fxe6 10. Qh5+ is a problem.

So, in playing ...Qh4 first, Black seeks to remove the possibility of white playing the important Qh5 move.

rannewman, returning to your variation, after 6....c6 7. Re1 Qh4 8. f3, play might continue 8....Be6 9. fxe4 dxc4, and I'm afraid I don't see white's winning continuation. It appears that black has two bishops to compensate for white's better pawns, and a possibility of ....Bd6 applying pressure to h2. Can you please show me?


click for larger view

Feb-02-12  sneaky pete: After 6... c6 7.Re1 Qh4 8.g3 .. and if the queen retreats to f6 or e7 then 9.Rxe4 dxe4 10.Nxf7 Rg8 11.Bg5 .. next.
Feb-02-12  RookFile: Yes, I suspect that this is white's best play. Is your intention 6....c6 7. Re1 Qh4 8. g3 Qe7 9. Rxe4 Be6 10. Re1 dxc4 11. Nxc4. White wins a pawn, black has the two bishops.

It seems white wins with best play, the position somewhat resembles a Ruy Lopez Marshall Gambit, but black doesn't have nearly the same pressure here that he does in Marshall's line.

Is there better for white?

Jun-10-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Marcelo Bruno: About the game, I have the comments from the Rigaer Tageblatt translated to French in Henri Delaire's L'échecs modernes.
Dec-03-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen:

<Riga 1911> Correspondence Match Behting v Nimzowitsch. Behting won the match +1-0=1

Dec-04-19  sneaky pete: <Riga 1911>

Schlechter in the Deutsche Schachzeitung, April 1913: "First game from a correspondence match. Played from April to December 1912."

Schlechter gives the <Rigaer Tageblatt> as his source for score and year.

Dec-04-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen:

<sneaky pete>

My source for the dating is Skjoldager and Nielsens' <"Aron Nimzowitsch On the Road to Chess Mastery 1886-1924"> pp.143-145

It's possible that Skjoldager and Nielsen may have transcribed the date inaccurately from <Deutsche Schachzeitung, April 1913>, since they list the same issue for this game- adding "page 10" to the listing.

They would have had to make two mistakes though- They list <Tidskrift For Schack 1913 no. 5-6 pp.83-85> for the second game in this match: Nimzowitsch vs K Behting, 1911

I'm looking at page 83 of that issue of the <Tidskrift> right now: This is what it says about the second game in this match:

"Andra partiet fran Korrespondensmatchen. Speladt fran april 1911 till januari 1913"

(Second game from the correspondence match. Played from April 1911 to January 1913)

I wonder if Skjoldager and Nielsen noticed the discrepancy, and made an editorial decision on which year the match started? Either that or they made a mistake transcribing the date from the <Deutsche Schachzeitung, April 1913>.

Might you provide a link to the <Deutsche Schachzeitung, April 1913>? I would like to look at that as well.

Dec-04-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen:

<sneaky pete> this is not exactly on topic, though it's a coincidence that bears somewhat on the topic in this thread.

I was just now fact checking this game Allies vs Nimzowitsch, 1921 and I noticed that Skjoldager and Nielsen appear to have made an error.

They list "Uppsala" as the site, but the issue and page number of the <Tidskrift> they cite actually says "Orebro" is the site. Allies vs Nimzowitsch, 1921 (kibitz #8)

Anyways. Anyone may make an error(s) and it is our job to find out what actually happened, if that's possible.

Dec-04-19  sneaky pete: <jfq> I can't give a link to that DSZ issue, I only have an old fashioned papery thing. The game is on pages 110 and 111. The heading reads:

8456. Französisches Springerspiel.

(1. Partie eines Korrespondenzwettkampfes. Gespielt von April bis Dezember 1912.)

C. BEHTING....A. NIEMZOWITSCH
......Weiß...............Schwarz

Looking at the dates given by S. & N. and considering that the other game lasted 65 moves, it's likely that both games started simultaneously April 1911. The "first" game may have been finished in December 1911 and the other one in January 1913, and the games were only published after both were completed. Schlechter was probably confused about the dates, but our Scandinavian friends were not, and everyone lived happily ever after.

Dec-04-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen:

<sneaky pete>

Thanks for going the extra mile!

I have an old fashioned papery copy of our Scandinavian friends' book and I can attest it "feels good." The only downside I can think of is "papery cuts" but in my entire life I have never gotten one of those. Secretly, I believe they may be an urban legend...

I hope they are still planning to complete the second volume of their wonderful biography on Nimzowitsch.

Feb-05-20  Granny O Doul: At the climax you can see the hand of the master, Behting.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Philidor Def: Nimzowitsch. Klein Var (C41) 1-0 Royal pin e-file
from g-pawn/file demolition after Fredthebear's ECO C by fredthebear
Philidor Def: Nimzowitsch. Klein Var (C41) 1-0 Royal pin e-file
from Mashed Potatoes Fed Fredthebear's Clan by fredthebear
85_#OTB_How to get away with Checkmate 2
by whiteshark
98_C41_Philidor + Black Lion
by whiteshark
BLOOD OF A POET or Composers at Play
by vonKrolock
placebosyn's favorite games
by placebosyn
Philidor Def: Nimzowitsch. Klein Var (C41) 1-0 Royal pin e-file
from Decoy to, Deflect from, Remove Fredthebear 4 by trh6upsz
Philidor Def: Nimzowitsch. Klein Var (C41) 1-0 Royal pin e-file
from Pins Ins and Outs, ECO C 20s, 40s, 50s, 60s-90s by rbaglini
Chess Miniatures, Collection XIII
by wwall
Corr Match Behting - Nimzowitsch
from Karl Behting Chess games by jessicafischerqueen
85_#OTB_How to get away with Checkmate 2
by trh6upsz

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC