Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Jose Raul Capablanca vs Oscar Chajes
New York Masters (1915), New York, NY USA, rd 5, Apr-25
Spanish Game: Open Variations. Classical Defense (C83)  ·  1-0



Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [19651 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 11 more Capablanca/O Chajes games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can step through the moves by clicking the < and > buttons, but it's much easier to simply use the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-12-04  Bobak Zahmat: It is not smart to deny analysis made by Capablanca of a variation. This way Chajes shows that not everyone can understand the meanings of every move made by super grandmaster. After 11. ... d4 is actually played, Capablanca dominates the game!
Nov-12-04  Whitehat1963: Even though he's my personal chess hero, Capablanca's analysis was hardly perfect. Here's what he says about black's 29th move: "29... ♖e6 would be no better, as then White could play either 30. ♗g6+! ♖xg6 31. ♖xe7+ ♔d8 32. ♘e5
threatening the ♖ook, and 33.♘f7 mate."

Only one problem, 29...Re6 is indeed much better than Chajes' 29...Be6. If white plays 30. Bg6+, black counters more than effectively with the simple 30...Nxg6!

What do Crafty and the chess engines have to say about 29...Re6, 30. Bg6+?

Premium Chessgames Member
  matey: Whitehat, no way Capablanca would of made such an obvious analysis error, that note needs to be taken out.
Nov-13-04  Whitehat1963: I make no apologies or retractions, <matey>. I'm just as surprised as you are that Capa could miss something so obvious, but my weak computer program confirms that 29...Re6 followed by Capa's 30. Bg6+ is effectively countered by 30...Nxg6! Can anyone with access to a good program like Fritz or Crafty confirm this? My program says that black has a significant advantage after 30...Nxg6! (Perhaps Capa saw this move but left it out of his published analysis, but I can't see why he would.)
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: The notes are from "My Chess Career" (Macmillan 1920) Capablanca did indeed make the gross analysis error of 29...Re6 30.Bg6+??

He does however, also, give the correct move of 30.h4! This essentially wins the pawn because if 30...g4 then 31.Nf4 wins easy. He is therfore correct when he says that Re6 is "no better".

Nov-14-04  euripides: Golombek repeats the error in his book on Capablanca.
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Capablanca may have written his notes to this game without a board in front of him...just looking at the scoresheet. Had the position arisen on the board at the time he would not have blundered away a piece.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: <euripides> Good point. In the revised, edited version (Batsford 1997), John Nunn corrects Golombek, calling 30.Bxg6 "a total oversight". Nunn was unaware that Capablanca had made the same error! Did Golembek blindly copy "My Chess Career"? Glancing at his other notes, he refers to Capablanca's annotations several times but adds his own comments as well. It appears that he started with Capa's comments, but failed to check this variation.

Another point - In Golembek's notes to the critical 18...h6?, he wrongly claims that Capablanca recommended 18...Bg4 and goes on to show that Black still has a bad position. However, as you can see from the notes, Capa recommended 18...0-0 and then 19...Bg4. Nunn also corrects another annotation in the game. Conclusion: Instructive notes by Capa albeit with a bad error, but a really sloppy effort from Harry on the annotations for this game.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Jonathan Sarfati: See also the rematch in this line with the same result Capablanca vs O Chajes, 1916, and this game where another leading player tried the line against Capa Capablanca vs A Hodges, 1916
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Noted-Games of Capa-Fischer
by saveyougod
from Capablanca's Best Games (Golombek) by Incremental
charles tol's favorite games
by charles tol
JohnO.O's favorite endgames
by JohnO.O
May / June, p. 102 [Game 87 / 2963]
from American Chess Bulletin 1915 by Phony Benoni
Game 27
from My Chess Career (Capablanca) by Qindarka
Round 5 (Sunday, April 25)
from New York 1915 (Masters' Tournament) by Phony Benoni
from Capablanca's Best Games (Golombek) by CherrylandCafe
Ruy Lopez
by chesser10
great understanding of the open ruy
from fav Capablanca & Fischer games by guoduke
capablanca best games
by brager
from Memorizedgame by parmetd
from Capablanca's Best Games (Golombek) by Chessdreamer
67JediChessMaster's Games for Learning
by 67JediChessMaster
Capa's games with annotation
by johncross
Capa's games with annotation
by brucemubayiwa
from endings by gmlisowitz
Capthahn86's favorite games
by Capthahn86
working on
by wwm

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC