chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Viswanathan Anand vs Evgeny Ilgizovich Bareev
14th Amber Tournament: Rapid (2005) (rapid), Monte Carlo MNC, rd 7, Mar-26
Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation. Main lines (B18)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 24 more Anand/Bareev games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: All games have a Kibitzer's Corner provided for community discussion. If you have a question or comment about this game, register a free account so you can post there.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-26-05  Hidden Skillz: i couldnt believe it was bareev..the man who beat anand!!
Mar-26-05  Phoenix: I believe it was Bareev himself who said Anand plays "superficial chess".
Mar-26-05  aragorn69: Any source for that quote, friend <Phoenix> ?? Doesn't sound like Gentleman Bareev to say that... although he is also known for his tongue-in-cheek irony, I believe.
Mar-26-05  your brilliance: Where did Anand go wrong? 26 Na5? Could he have defended the knight with Qc3-Qe1? And what was the idea behind 25 Ra4? Thanks in advance to anyone answering.
Mar-26-05  colp99: not a good day for Anand. I hope he can play better tommorow.
Mar-26-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <what was the idea behind 25 Ra4?> Even though 25. Ra4?! is positionally ugly, it's not a forced loss. Perhaps Anand thought he could outplay Bareev by creating some strange complications. Unfortunately for Anand, Bareev plays solid and Anand's followup 26. Na5? is a mistake, leaving White with a lost game after the deflection 26...e4! (not 26...Qxa5?? 27. Qxb7#).

Anand probably saw he could equalize with 25.Bxh6! gxh6 26.Qxf6=, but decided to pass it up and complicate with 25. Ra4?! That also appears to be the case with the blunder 26. Na5?, when instead 26. Nd2!? Rd5 27. Ne4 = holds for White.

Mar-26-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: Interestingly, the deflection 26...e4! serves three purposes: (1) defending against the mate threat 27. Qxb7#; (2) creating a decoying double attack threat against Knight and Queen; (3) anchoring a winning defense against 27. Rxb7+ or 27. Rxe4.
Mar-26-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: With 34...Bc7 Bareev defends accurately,
and avoids Anand's double attack trap 34...Bxc5? 35.Qb8+ Kd7 36.Qc7+ Ke8 37.Qc8+ Ke7 38.Qxc5+ Ke8 39.Bd6 .
Mar-27-05  Ulhumbrus: 23 Nxd6+ gains the superior minor piece for the ending.
Mar-27-05  Ulhumbrus: 36 c6 offers a poor transaction if we assume that White's c pawn is much more valuable than Black's f pawn.
Mar-27-05  your brilliance: Thanks <patzer2>. Wouldn't 27. Qc3 have been better than Rxe4?
Mar-27-05  Karpova: wow, winning with black in rapid chess against the best rapid player in the world, playing the caro-kann defence anand plays also very often is a great achievement!
Mar-27-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Wouldn't 27. Qc3 have been better than Rxe4?> After 27. Qc3, Black wins with 27...b6! As a note of caution, Black should avoid the blunder 27. Qc3 Nd5??

An analysis with Fritz 8 @ 15 depth follows:

27.Qc3 b6! [not 27...Nd5?? 28.Rxb7+ Qxb7 29.Qxc5+ Qb6 30.Nc6+ Kb7 31.Qxb6+ Kxb6 32.Nxd8 Rxd8 33.Rxe4 ] 28.Nc4 Bd4 [also winning is 28...Bxf2! 29.Rh3 Bd4 30.Qb4 e3 31.Nxe3 Bxe3 32.Rxe3 Nd5+] 29.Qb4 Bxf2 30.Rf4

[a) 30.Ne3 Bxe3 31.Rxe3 (31.Bxe3 Rd1+ 32.Bc1 e3 33.Rc3 Qe5 34.Rh2 e2 35.Rxe2 Qxe2+) 31...Nd5 ;

b) 30.Qc3 Nd5 31.Qd2 Bxg3 32.Rh1 Qxc4 ;

c) 30.Rh1 Nd5 31.Qa4 e3 32.Ra3 Qc8 33.g4 e2 34.Rf3 e1Q ]

30...Nd5 31.Qd2 e3 32.Qe2 Nxf4+ (-3.50 @ 15 depth)

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: RAPID. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Tabiyas 0004 +15 Moves + 100 Games
by Miguel Medina
Tabiyas 0004 +15 Moves + 100 Games
by Chibauk
26...e4! wins, immediately punishing 26. Na5??
from Deflection by patzer2
4...Bf5
from Caro Kann & French by russian bunny

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC