Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Vladimir Kramnik vs Loek van Wely
14th Amber Tournament: Rapid (2005) (rapid), Monte Carlo MNC, rd 11, Mar-31
Sicilian Defense: Lasker-Pelikan. Sveshnikov Variation Chelyabinsk Variation (B33)  ·  1-0



explore this opening
find similar games 40 more Kramnik/Van Wely games
sac: 27.Rxh4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-31-05  Phoenix: Kramnik kills his own beloved Svesh in brutal fashion. Looks like Sveshnikov players finally have to fight for their lives at the elite top for the first time in years.
Mar-31-05  Strategic Joker: I think white's mistake was being blinded by materialism , problably if he handt been on this pawn snath expedition things shouldnt have been this bad , ill analyze this position and bring you some notes later on ^_^
Mar-31-05  admiralnemo: <SK> uh, <I think white's mistake was being blinded by> i think you mean black's mistake...
Mar-31-05  Kangaroo: Yes, very much true about the opening. Kramnik became an expert after his hillarious game with Ponomarev (see Ponomariov vs Kramnik, 2005 ) who sacrificed a rook and should have won the game as white.
Mar-31-05  admiralnemo: uh, i think <i> meant <SJ>, sorry. It's not Strategic Koker...whatever a Koker is...
Mar-31-05  guitar2001: Phoenix: Kramnik kills his own beloved Svesh in brutal fashion. Looks like Sveshnikov players finally have to fight for their lives at the elite top for the first time in years.

Huh? Dude, it was a rapid game. Calm down.

Mar-31-05  acirce: <who sacrificed a rook and should have won the game as white.> Should? At no point in that game was White winning.
Mar-31-05  maoam: I suppose Kramnik's powerful novelty 20.f4! was prepared for the Brissago match, and it works wonderfully against van Wely. In their previous encounter (Kramnik vs Van Wely, 2005) Kramnik used (according to Bareev) only the eight best variation. I wonder how highly this line ranks in his preparation...
Mar-31-05  Strategic Joker: LoL yes i meant blacks mistake sorry went blind there myself ^_^
Mar-31-05  Phoenix: <guitar2001> I am calm. Black has been having some troubles in this line for a couple of tournaments now, and not just in rapid games. As an 1.e4 player, I've been waiting for the opportunity to quit my 3.Bb5 lines for years. Die, Svesh, Die!


Mar-31-05  Strategic Joker: Phoenix what are u having problems against can you post maybe i can help ?
Mar-31-05  Hesam7: <Phoenix> Nigel Short is also very skeptic about Sveshnikov variation.
Apr-01-05  aragorn69: When White plays 16.Ra2, who would gess it's going soon to make its way to h2 ?!?... White has four pawns and a piece to move before the way to the h-file can become free... and he manages it in a mere seven moves !!

On a side note, one difference between Kramnik's treatment of the opening as Black (vs.Ponomariov, link above) and Van Wely's is that Vlady played 19.-Bf6 (instead of 19.-Bg5 which facilitates the anyway thematic 20.f4 break).

Apr-06-05  Lipsome: very brutal game...another one to show people who say he is boring

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: RAPID. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 7
from Move by Move - Kramnik (Lakdawala) by Qindarka
from Sicilian Sveshnikov 9.Nd5 by KingG
Tactics - 3
by obrit
Game 7
from Move by Move - Kramnik (Lakdawala) by Insession52
Tactics - 3
by Jaredfchess
Kramnik Move by Move
by LionHeart40
Kramnik Move by Move
by rpn4

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC