chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
R Hopton vs F Eastwood
Unknown (1860) (correspondence), Postal
Dutch Defense: Hopton Attack (A80)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games more games of R Hopton
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can suggest a game for Guess-the-Move with the Guess-the-Move Suggestion Queue.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-22-05  FinKing: <Kids> please, do not try this at home
Jul-22-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Go ahead, make.......my.........day.
Dec-07-05  Chopin: That has got to hurt!
Dec-17-05  Madman99X: That is ugly.
Mar-23-06  blingice: Try to play this one out in your head using the Text display. It was very hard for me, probably because I'm not familiar with this opening at all.
Dec-08-06  Ch3ckmate: i dont get it...tell me why white resigned?
Dec-08-06  Cyphelium: <Ch3ckmate> After 6.- ♕b4+ 7. c3 or 7. ♘d2 or whatever, black plays ♕xh4 winning the bishop.
Dec-09-06  Ch3ckmate: darn, so obvious i didnt even think about it..heh thanks
Jan-29-07  LaSmitedCrab: This....was...postal...loss...in...6 moves?!
Jan-29-07  laskereshevsky: HELLO FOLKS

maybe <Hopton> was under the gun.....

<Eastwood>.....<Eastwood>.....mmmhhhh...... this name remind me something.....mh mh...
i donnow....something about a latin word
followed by a number ..... sooooo..... wellllll......maybe 44 MAGNUM?!?!

Feb-27-07  MrPatzer: This "Hopton Attack" does not impress me much.
Jun-07-09  WhiteRook48: 6 Bxf6 may be better, causing black the pain of doubled pawns
Jan-02-10  wordfunph: <FinKing: <Kids> please, do not try this at home>

lol!

Jan-02-10  zanshin: I'm not quite sure how this game got through the <CG> quality controls ;-)

If anyone's curious, Black could not try the Noah's Ark trap with <3...g5 4.Bg3 f4> because of <5.e3!> threatening exf4 or Qh5#


click for larger view

Jan-02-10  Nullifidian: <WhiteRook48: 6 Bxf6 may be better, causing black the pain of doubled pawns>

Black can capture the bishop with the queen. It doesn't allow White to win a free pawn because of 7. ♙dxc5?? ♕xa1. Still, you're correct that it's better than the game move.

Mar-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: < This "Hopton Attack" does not impress me much.>

Change your thinking on this. OK, Hopton himself didn't have a happy experience first time out -- but 40 years later Marshall and other New York players began to use 2.Bg5 against the Dutch. Later still, it was used by Bronstein. Today it is one of a number of highly fashionable Anti-Dutch lines, along with 2.Nc3 and 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.h3 e6 4.g4.

With 2.Bg5 White sets Black an immediate problem, as 2...Nf6 (a natural move in most lines of the Dutch) is simply bad. White plays Bxf6 and gets both a positional advantage and an attack.

So black has to be more subtle. 2...h6 is playable, but gets wild and crazy. I think Andrew Martin suggested the more solid 2...c6 in a DVD on this line.

Mr Hopton's opening ideas were ahead of their time. And also maybe a little ahead of his playing ability, but hey - we all make mistakes.

Mar-26-12  waustad: There was a rather horrid beverage called "Hoppin Gator" some decades ago. Perhaps that could be turned into a pun or the day.
Dec-22-13  solskytz: Missed it by a hair!
Apr-05-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: GOTD Pun: Hang 'em High

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061747/

Oct-06-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Hopton has exactly one game in the database, this six-move loss. As White in a correspondence game, no less. Apparently on this authority of this game, 2.Bg5 is known as the "Hopton Attack." If I lose a game in six moves, can I get an opening line named after me?
Oct-06-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: The etymology of opening lines can be strange and inconsistent; numerous other variations have borne the names of players who adopted them well after their earliest recorded voyages in the seas of Dame Theory.

While having often played 2.Bg5 across the years, I had never known who Hopton was till now.

Oct-08-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <perfidious> I too am a 2.Bg5 aficionado. Despite a couple of hours of research, I haven't been able to find out who named it the Hopton Attack. Probably a bit of humor by Eric Schiller or someone else.
Oct-08-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: There is a lot of poison to 2.Bg5.
But if Black knows how to respond,he is fine/ok,compared to the mainlines.
Oct-08-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <moronovich>, a case in point from your humble narrator's last serious event, the last time I played 2.Bg5--bit hard to believe nearly twenty years have gone since: A Shaw vs J A Curdo, 2001.
Oct-08-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: <perfidious> Oh,dear how time flies...
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
This was a correspondence game. Ended in 6, yes, 6 moves.
from Oh wait, I didn't see that coming! by LaSmitedCrab
Games Of My Name
by DutchKnight
Game collection: 1
by gr2ca
d4 f5
from 5 moves by thomasdoss
Clue #55
from Holiday Present Hunt Solutions: 2013 by Penguincw
Games to add to my book
by chessfors
Dutch Defense: Hopton Attack (A80) 0-1 Q+ fork LPDO B
from Headed to Holland Next Year with Fredthebear by fredthebear
Dutch Defense: Hopton Attack (A80) 0-1 Q+ fork LPDO B
from Howlerz, P-Q4 Trapz, Hidden Snarez Fredthebear by fredthebear
Dutch Defense: Hopton Attack (A80) 0-1 Q+ fork LPDO B
from Dutchsinse Geophysics Sho(up)ok Fredthebear by trh6upsz
Hopton Attack
from Playing Their Opening by blackcat7oo
Hopton attack
from Nephrons1's games for Aeneas and Lilija by Nephrons1
4. Fork.
from 6 Moves. by PinkLedDoor

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC