chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Horace Curzon Plunkett vs Wilhelm Steinitz
"Plunkett Down" (game of the day Jan-04-2009)
Simul, 13b (1874), Oxford ENG, Feb-??
Italian Game: Two Knights Defense. Ponziani-Steinitz Gambit (C57)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more H C Plunkett/Steinitz game
sac: 9.Qe2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-22-07  RookFile: The ultimate Steinitz game: <both> sides send their kings on king walks.
Dec-12-07  parmetd: positively gorgeous look at move 40 if Kxc4 then Nd6+ cxc6 Rc1+
Jan-04-09  syracrophy: The first real battle I see in a long time. Both sides where attacking strongly and the kings marching to battle at the front. And more credit to the fact that the losing side was Steinitz.
Jan-04-09  starkidaway: I'm wondering what would white play after 20...Bb4.

After all, black is up a whole rook!

Jan-04-09  shr0pshire: kind of ghetto spelling of steinitz on the homepage with two Zs.
Jan-04-09  zdigyigy: This guy Plunkett has only two games in the database, both are wins over Steinitz!!
Jan-04-09  spikester2848: Very lovely game! Wish more of todays players had as much guts as the romantics did then. This style of chess leads to very wild, fun games.
Jan-04-09  Andrijadj: Looks like they had shared a bottle of whisky before the game...
Jan-04-09  Samagonka: What a hell of a game!
Jan-04-09  cuendillar: 40...Kxc4? 41.Nd6+ cxd6 42.Rc1+ is a neat variation at the very end.
Jan-04-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 25...Qa5 was a grave mistake. Instead of that 25...Qa6 with intention to meet eventual 26.Qg3 with 26...Qh6 was necessary. 26...Bg4+!? 27.Qxg4 Bf8 would have been also significantly better defense than text move though white is already much better here.
Jan-04-09  zzzzzzzzzzzz: white sacks a lot
Jan-04-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <white sacks a lot> But these sacs were not sound and white could have lost the game if Steinitz would not have blundered in move 25.
Jan-04-09  Chess Carnival: 19th century chess is a joy to play through!
Jan-04-09  Blaise99a: Yes, I also enjoyed a game for once, with both sides punching. But I did a cruel thing running the game through a silicon monster (but someone had to do it).......I'll spare everyone the nasty bits, given that it is 19th century and all; but still some of the moves are utterly incomprensible to me. For example, what's up with 20.....Bc5 ??

20.....Rg2 or Qc5 are so - obvious is not even the word for it. And then what was Steinitz thinking with 22.....Bc8 ?

Even for the 19th century, it is hard to believe best player in the world can be, silicon language: 5.00 to 6.00 up (after 22....Rg2), with a solid position and still lose! If I didn't know better, I would almost think that Steinitz thought it more polite to lose to the Duke. (Was Steinitz the houseguest or something?)

Jan-04-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessmensch: The "expected" move 4 for black is ...d5. My Deep Fritz 10 supports this by a considerable margin. Why not in this game?
Jan-04-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: Steinitz and his trademark wandering King--when it works, it looks great. But it doesn't always work (especially when I try it).
Jan-04-09  WhiteRook48: plus Steinitz lost! what happened?
"Steinitz lost! What a game! The king is not a fighting piece!"
Jan-04-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  eternaloptimist: Maybe Steinitz fell asleep for a while in this game. Maybe that's why he lost it; he might have gotten into time trouble & made a blunder. I noticed that there are 2 Zs on the end of his name on the home page. zzzzzzzzzz hehe
Jan-04-09  jovack: steinitz dropped the ball

i thought he had a considerable advantage at some point in the middle game

Jan-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <For example, what's up with 20.....Bc5 ??

20.....Rg2 or Qc5 are so - obvious is not even the word for it.>

Well, 20...Qc5 with intention to trade Queens is quite obvious here if you wants just to score a point in the game. But 20...Bc5 aims for the initiative for a Pawn and doesn't give away the advantage of black (only a part of it in silicon beast's numeric expression). Steinitz undoubtedly saw that but he decided to play the game in more entertaining way.

Also 22...Bc8 is not bad per se, though there were more useful moves than that. As I have written before, 25...Qa5 was a blunder,

Jan-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: A great upset-similar to Boston College vs UNC on 1/4/09.

BC was ranked eleventh IN ITS CONFERENCE,UNC was undefeated.

Mar-01-09  WhiteRook48: Steinitz loses?!
Apr-30-18  steinitzgambit: I would like to endorse Honza Cervenka's analysis. Steinitz could have won with 25...Qa6! instead of 25...Qa5? Then the game would have run as follows: 25. Ke2 Qa6 26. c3 Bf8 27. Ng5+ Kg8 28. Qd5+ Be6 29. Nxe6 Qxe6 30. Qxe6+ Rxe6 31. Kf3 Bd6 32. d4 Kf7 33. f5 Rxe5 34. dxe5 Bxe5 35. Ra1 a6 36. Rd1 Kf6 37. Rd8 Kxf5 38. Rf8+ Ke6 39. Re8+ Kd5 40. Rd8+ Bd6 41. Rb8 b6 42. Rg8 Rh1 43. Rxg7 Rf1+ 44. Ke3 Rb1 45. Rg5+ Ke6 46. Ke4 Rxb2 47. b4 c5 48. Rg6+ Kd7 49. Kd5 Rd2+ 50. Ke4 cxb4 51. cxb4 Re2+ 52. Kd5 Rd2+ 53. Ke4 Kc6 54. Rg8 Rb2 55. g4 Rxb4+ 56. Kf5 Kd5 57. g5 Rf4+ 58. Kg6 a5 59. Ra8 a4 60. Kh7 Rh4+ 61. Kg8 Rg4 62. Kf7 Rxg5 63. Rxa4 b5 64. Ra2 Rf5+ 65. Kg6 Rf1 66. Rd2+ Ke6 67. Rg2 Be5 0-1 with a winning position for Black.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
January 4: Plunkett Down
from Game of the Day 2009 by Phony Benoni
Wilhelm Steinitz's Best Games
by KingG
Wilhelm Steinitz's Best Games
by Nimzophile
Plunkett reaches the end zone-vs Steinitz
from pun city by kevin86
parmetd's favorite games
by parmetd
Zebra
by lonchaney
fm avari viraf's favorite games
by fm avari viraf
Oxford 1874 "Plunkett Down" (GOTD)
from Favorite Games from (1515-1916) by wanabe2000
double King March
from chess strategems ix - under construction by gauer
The Ultimate Steinitz Game
from Brilliancies By "Unknowns" by TheAlchemist
2- 2n
by classicalwin2


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC