Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Vladimir Kramnik vs Veselin Topalov
MTel Masters (2005), Sofia BUL, rd 10, May-22
Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation. English Attack (B80)  ·  0-1



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 29 times; par: 37 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 102 more Kramnik/Topalov games
sac: 31...Ne6 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 26 OF 26 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-05-05  russep: Didn't Topalov blunder his knight in this game. Kramnik didn't see it and finally blundered. So the both blundered.
Jul-05-05  Dres1: I dont think Topalov ever drops a knight... please explain when white can take a knight?
Jul-05-05  russep: Move 30. White could take the knight then the bishop if he doesn't move it.
Jul-15-05  LIFE Master AJ: <all> Check the bottom half of this page, ( everything is explained there.
Jul-16-05  Dres1: if white takes the knight on move 30, then black will play rook ac8 defending his bishop, and then bishop e7 if necessary to win back the b4 knight, unless there is something im missing
Jul-16-05  mymt: 30.Qxc5 Bxe2 31.Rxe2 Be7 32.Qxe5 Bxb4
Jul-16-05  mymt: 31.Qxc5 Bxe2
Jul-26-05  LIFE Master AJ: <mymt> 31.Qxc5!, BxN/e2; ('?') is easily met by 32.Qf2! Now if Black takes the Rook on d1 ... he drops his Queen. Capturing the Knight (with the Queen) on c5 WAS th best move, however. (Fritz 8.0 gives, Qxc5, Rec8; and then renders an 'eval' of "plus-slash-minus," or White is winning.)

Oct-15-05  AlexanderMorphy: mark my words, Topalov will do the same as he did in this game and beat Kramnik to gain the FIDE world championship title!
Oct-15-05  iron maiden: He already has it.
Oct-16-05  AlexanderMorphy: i mean the other world title, which Kramnik currently holds!
Nov-09-05  alexandrovm: Kramnik managed to win the exchange, then blunder a hole piece. Was he better before the blunder?
Dec-16-05  Conde de Montecristo: This is fate.
Dec-16-05  malakaboy: will the real chess champion please make the first move,has it gotten to the point that so much smoke and mirriors have consealed the real champion from our own eye's,lets trace the game back to karpov,we all agree he was the best after fischer,so we will start with him ,now after karpov kasparov became with me so far ,ok than after kasparov,lets see oh yeah it was kramnik so we have the last three champions ,karpov,kasparov,and kramnik and they all beat each other in succession to become world champion,so since kramnik has not been beaten by anyone yet and he did not retire from chess how did topalov become new worlds champion,he cant be champion first of all your last name has to start with a k to become chess champion ,go figure that out
Dec-16-05  aw1988: Topalov is the FIDE champion, not the world champion. Big difference.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Joshka: Yes, it's amazing how folks get this all twisted up, it's so easy....Kramnik is World Champion following the line from Kasparov/Karpov...Topolov Is FIDE Champion following the line from Kasim and Pono ect.
Dec-17-05  aw1988: Hence "reunification", and how some people actually ask "why do we need a stupid reunification"...
Feb-05-06  Badmojo: Vladimir Kramnik is WITHOUT A DOUBT the world champion.

He may not be playing like one, but beat him in a match then. Topolov is a paper champion, churned out by FIDE.

Topolov is the rightful challanger, so let's hope those two camps can make something happen.

Feb-05-06  Steppenwolf: Good beating of Kramnik by the World Champion Topalov. Kramnik is a "has been" now, Topalov shouldn't even bother about him anymore.
Feb-05-06  cannibal: <Joshka
Kramnik is World Champion following the line from Kasparov/Karpov...>

That's true. But a line consisting in exactly two players - even if they are that strong - is no a very convincing argument. Cause if you go back on that line, Fischer would still be world champion, as has been pointed out 1000 times. Oh no, wait, actually its Alekhine. Or Morphy. ;-)

Beating Kasparov certainly gave him the right to call himself WC (even if he LOST the qualifier), but thats more than 5 years ago. In the meantime he has defended that title against a player chosen because of his success in ONE single tournament (Dortmund 2002). Is that what you consider a fair qualifier? And to be honest: if he had chosen the strongest player in the world as an opponent, he wouldnt have had a chance for the last 3 years or so. Of course he's sick and so on, but hey, if you're sick for 3 years, there goes your title. Thats the way it is in any other sport. Of course, if the official organisation cant put up a fair WC, things are different. But now that they have...

Mar-21-06  alexandrovm: I insist on this question here:
<alexandrovm: Kramnik managed to win the exchange, then blunder a hole piece. Was he better before the blunder?>
Apr-05-06  ghristo: Doesn`t win 31.Qxc5 Bxe2 32.Qf2 ?
Aug-31-06  Inf: <Badmojo: Vladimir Kramnik is WITHOUT A DOUBT the world champion> YES THERE IS A DOUBT... kasparov gave that 2000 title away...
Sep-28-06  SniperOnG7: I wonder why Kramnik is not playing e4 against Topalov right now? ;)
Mar-15-08  positionalgenius: Hilarious game
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 26)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 26 OF 26 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Topalov and the two bishops
by OJC
Power Chess - Topalov
by Anatoly21
The Duo begains!!
from ckmate313's favorite games by ckmate313
Three big blunders in one game between two great players
from Grandmaster Blunders by alexmagnus
from Kramnik's destiny gets crushed..... by Conde de Montecristo
Three big blunders in one game between two great players
from T Tops Distract Fredthebear by fredthebear
Exchange sacs - 1
by obrit
Game 10
from Topalov at Mtel Tournament by Topzilla
Najdorf - early f3 by White and 9 ...b5 by Topalov
from Richard Taylor's favorite games by Richard Taylor
#11 How to face a Sicilian
from Kramnik 2005 gems by Conde de Montecristo
X Unrealpk I
by X Unrealpk I
Sicillian Defense
by Zhbugnoimt
Volodya versus Vesko
by Resignation Trap
34. Ng1= (Not 34. Nc1??)
from Defensive Combinations by xajik
Three big blunders in one game between two great players
from 2004 - 2007 W's 2nd Term ECO B, C by fredthebear
The Sicilian Defense
by Timothy Glenn Forney
Classic Topalov
by amadeus
Kramnik's losses with White
by amadeus
Topalov is formidable !
from Chess is a liberating game. by arielbekarov

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC