chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Siegbert Tarrasch vs Schroeder
Nurnberg (1894) (unorthodox), Nuremberg GER
Chess variants (000)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [22341 more games annotated by Stockfish]

find similar games 4 more Tarrasch/Schroeder games
sac: 23.Qxh7+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-28-07  controlaltdelete: the knight on f3 isn't there anymore in the actual game, but according to the frontpage one could play Nh4+ after the Queen sack right .. or does the manouver Kh5-g4 save black?
May-28-07  malthrope: <controlaltdelete: the knight on f3 isn't there anymore in the actual game, but according to the frontpage one could play Nh4+ after the Queen sack right .. or does the manouver Kh5-g4 save black?>

Did you overlook my post (with diagram) given just below? I analyzed that line with 'tongue-in-cheek' and after 1. Qxh7+ Kxh7 2. hxg++ Kxg6 3. Nh4+ for if 3... Kh5 then just 4. Bd1# ;-) - Mal

May-28-07  WarmasterKron: Curses. I eventually saw the whole mating line, then saw the knight 'guarding' h6 and gave up.

Of course, pinned pieces guard nothing and if I'd noticed the pin I'd have been fine.

May-28-07  prinsallan: <Larsker>Yep, that was exactly what I meant. CG.com. Queensac every monday is kind of boring and obvious. If you found at least another solution half of the mondays these puzzles would teach us much, much more. No nag intended, just friendly critisicm.
May-28-07  kkshethin: I think there is error in the record. it should be 12.Nb1-d2 instead of 12.Nf3-d2. If this was corrected then starting of game without night at b1 and showing of Night at f3 at puzzle stage wil be solved.
May-28-07  IMDONE4: <Larsker>, <prinsallan> arent mondays SUPPOSED to be easy and obvious?
May-28-07  Kwesi: I reckon an early ...Bf5 was necessary
May-28-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: these holiday Mondays always throw me off...I solve the puzzle and briefly think I must be getting better, then I remember it's just Monday.

I think these puzzles get a ridiculous amount of criticism, especially the Monday puzzles. For the millionth time, Monday is <supposed> to be easy. And even so, a few people miss the Monday puzzle every week, which is a pretty good indication that cg.com shouldn't make it harder.

If you find yourself insulted or bored by the Monday puzzle, just skip it and wait until later in the week. And stop whining.

May-28-07  YouRang: Again, a puzzle made easier by the knowledge that it is Monday. It took me a couple passes of the 23. Qxh7+ line to solve it, because I didn't notice the first time that the knight ended up pinned by the bishop, and thus offered no resistance to 26. Rh6#. Good puzzle.
May-28-07  greensfield: First played 23.hxg6 and worked out 3 variations all leading mate. Then I realised that my Queen had been under the cosh all the time, and quickly found the right moves starting 23. Qh7+. Got there in the end.
May-28-07  YouRang: Schroder was good enough of a player to beat Tarrasch, given rook odds: Tarrasch vs Schroeder, 1892

<IMDONE4: <Larsker>, <prinsallan> arent mondays SUPPOSED to be easy and obvious?>

Yes, they are. But in fairness, I think the point that <Larsker> and <prinsallan> were making was not about *easiness*, but about *diversity*. If I understand them correctly, they don't want to make Monday puzzles harder -- they would just like to see a wider variety of themes (in particular, not using queen sac theme so frequently).

I don't think that's a bad idea. I find that often on Mondays, a good puzzle is "solved" by merely looking for a queen sac, rather than doing the more rewarding analysis, which is sort of unfortunate.

May-28-07  GoldenKnight: <RookFile> Good to see you again! Your name has come up during our game vs. Yury Schulman. Are you going to be with us when we play CCWC Gert Jan Timmerman?
May-28-07  dzechiel: <kkshethin: I think there is error in the record. it should be 12.Nb1-d2 instead of 12.Nf3-d2. If this was corrected then starting of game without night at b1 and showing of Night at f3 at puzzle stage wil be solved.>

Your line of thought is good, but white's 15th move shows that it's not the case.

May-28-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: A easy queen sac and mate in three. Add that to the "incentive" given by black who "trapped" white's queen.
May-28-07  jhoro: CG has the wrong diagram on the front page. they've put an extra Knight on f3


click for larger view

May-28-07  jhoro: i told them yesterday that the Ponomariov vs Rublevsky, 2007 game was wrong, which they fixed, but then they also removed my message. no one likes being caught. let's see if they'll do it again :)
May-28-07  Shadout Mapes: 1. ...d5 is a rather effective opening move when white plays without the queen's knight.
May-28-07  GBKnight: This was presumably played at 'knight odds' - theoretically black is winning at move 1 a piece ahead, so the diagram is correct..
May-28-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  fm avari viraf: To be candid, I dislike to see a game when odds are given. This proves that the player who gives odds is a very strong player & therefore, he has ample chances to win & that doesn't make any sense to me.
May-28-07  jhoro: <GBKnight>, look again. Tarrasch lost his last (and only Knight) on move 17. how come he has another Knight (on f3) at move 23?
May-28-07  patzer2: White utilizes the pin to support a mate in three with 23. Qxh7+!
May-28-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheAlchemist: <Schroder was good enough of a player to beat Tarrasch, given rook odds: Tarrasch vs Schroeder, 1892>

Which means Tarrasch was only 4 pawns better than Schroeder

May-28-07  GBKnight: The diagram is wrong, but if you play through the game no second knight appears on f3
May-28-07  tacite: <RookFile : Agreed, this also forces checkmate in short order. Of course, Qxh7+ is shorter and prettier.> The sacrifice of a Queen is prettier? That's an Othello point of view ;-)
Jan-24-09  WhiteRook48: 2. e5 isn't played today
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: UNORTHODOX. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 255
from Three Hundred Chess Games (Tarrasch) by Parmenides1963
esthetics
by ALEXIN
Cntr Cntr Declined 2.e5?! (000/B01) 1-0 Famous h-file sac attk
from Leearn Checkmates on the 3rd/6th Outer File by fredthebear
23.? (Monday, May 28)
from POTD Variants by takchess
23.? (Monday, May 28)
from Puzzle of the Day 2007 by Phony Benoni
Game 276, Nuremberg 1892-1894
from Tarrasch's Dreihundert Schachpartien by Honza Cervenka
Game 255 of 'Three Hundred Chess Games' by Siegbert Tarrasch.
from yQThee Queen is Meaner Volume Three!?! by fredthebear
Queen sacs
by outplayer
Tactics - 2
by obrit
Andreiko's favorite games
by Andreiko
Cntr Cntr Declined 2.e5?! (000/B01) 1-0 Famous h-file sac attk
from yDecoy To-o, Deflection From, Remove Fredthebear by trh6upsz
23.? (May 28, 2007)
from Monday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
Fixed castle 19.g5!
from Challenger Tarrasch by Gottschalk
Cntr Cntr Declined 2.e5?! (000/B01) 1-0 Famous h-file sac attk
from Leearn Checkmates on the 3rd/6th Outer File by trh6upsz

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC