chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
David Janowski vs Carl Schlechter
Schlechter - Janowski (1902), Karlsbad BOH (Austro-Hungarian Empire), rd 5, Jun-13
Spanish Game: Morphy Defense. Modern Steinitz Defense (C71)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 38 more Janowski/Schlechter games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Help with kibitzing features can be found on our Kibtizing Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-09-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: At move 40...


click for larger view

....the position is a well-known draw. I don't know why Janowsky played another 17 moves.

Jun-08-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: Janowski had lost the first four games in this projected 14-game match. He obviously needed to score wins in his--at most--5 remaining games as White. As <offramp> has pointed out, Janowski played on in the endgame here long after the game was a clear draw.

But if the result here was a disappointment for Janowski, he at last had stopped the bleeding.

1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6

Schechter had won Game #1 of this match with a Petroff's Defense (when Janowski blundered early) and Game #3 with a French Defense (after being clearly lost). Now, with a healthy lead, he reverted to the Ruy Lopez for the balance of the match, drawing here and in Game #9 and losing only Game #7. By this stage, a draw was nearly as good as a win for Schlechter.

3. Bb5 a6

In Game #9, Schlechter employed the Berlin Defense.

4. Ba4 d6

The "Modern Steinitz Defense." Schlechter played another version of this variation (i.e., 4...Nf6 5. 0-0 Be7 6. Re1 d6) in Game #7.

5. Nc3

5. c3; 5. 0-0; and 5. BxN+ are more normal. But after losing the first four games running in this match, Janowski perhaps wanted something sound ad safe.

5... Bd7

5...Nf6 is most usual here. The text was famously employed in Yates--Alekhine San Remo 1930.

6. 0-0

Yates tried the ultra-cautious 6. d3 against Alekhine, but was nonetheless defeated ( as was nearly everybody else against Alekhine at San Remo 1930).

6... Nf6
7. d3

An uncharacteristically cautious move by Janowski, perhaps chastened by the prior games in the match.

7... Be7
8. Ne2

An off-beat idea from Janowski, probably looking to create action on the King's side"


click for larger view

8... 0-0
9. Ng3

Still not deigning to play c3.

9... Re8

With a four-game lead in the match, Schechter decided to avoid 9...b5 which looks best but might lead to complications/

10. c3

Better late than never.

10... Bf8

Seemingly looking to live up to his reputation as "the drawing master."


click for larger view

11. Bb3

Still playing hyper-cautious chess after the catastrophes in Games 1 through 4.

11... h6

11...Na5 looks indicated, but Schlechter apparently saw no reason (as least yet) to take the slightest chance in this game.

12. Re1 Be6

Again declining to play Na5 (followed by ...c5).

13. d4

13. BxB seems to give White a small edge.

13... BxB

Removing one of Janowski's beloved Bishops was often a good way to play against this tactical wizard.

14. QxB


click for larger view

Thus far nothing very exciting had happened in this game. Here, however, Schlechter--of all people--decided to mix things up. As will be seen, he soon lost a pawn and then spent the rest of the game fighting for a draw. He would seem to be in decent shape with either 14...Na5 or 14...b5. Perhaps sensing that Schlechter was ripe for the taking once again in this match, Schlechter declined to play either of these seemingly normal moves.

Jun-10-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: Post II

14... d5?!

Schlechter was perhaps the last player of the time I would expect to try this.

In my last post, I ended with a bad typo. I meant to say, in explaining Schlechter's venture: "Perhaps sensing that JANOWSKI was ripe for the taking" (after having lost the first four games of the match). The move, while hardly sound, did have the virtue of setting problems for Janowski, the position now being:


click for larger view

Janowski had to choose here between three plausible options:

A) 15. Nxe5
B) 15. dxe5
C) 15. exd5

Janowski chose option C. Stockfish agrees. It would have been my last choice of the three, though in practice it worked out well for Janowski, It left:


click for larger view

15... Qxd5

Not bad if Black is willing to enter an unfavorable ending probably down a pawn but with decent drawing chances. Perhaps best would have been: 15...Na5 16. Qa4 e4 17. QxN b6 [17...exN was another reasonable line] 18. Qa4 b5 19. Qc2 exN 20. RxR QxR 21. gxf3 Rd8 22. a4 Nxd5 where White has an extra pawn but a busted King-side pawn formation.

The text left:


click for larger view

16. QxQ

Heading for a pawn up ending rather than pressing Black with 16. c4. Objectively, this was probably best. Had Janowski been playing all out to win, however, he might have sought complications rather than a technically advantageous endgame.

16... NxQ

This left:


click for larger view

17. Nxe5

Again declining the more complicated option: 17. dxe5 Nb6 18. Bf4 Na4 19. Re2. Arguably the best line. White is up a pawn (as in the game) but Black has serious counter-play. Once again, Janowski--perhaps chastened by his four-game losing streak, decided to play sound chess and to try to win a technically superior ending with fewer uncertainties.

17... NxN
18. dxN

The position was now:


click for larger view

Despite White's extra pawn, Black is probably OK with 18...f6. But, once again, Schlechter decided to press for more with:

18... a5?!
19. Bd2


click for larger view

Despite his pawn minus, Black still has good drawing chances with 19...Nb6 or 19...Rad8. But yet again, Schlechter decided to try to play for a win. This led to serious tension in which both players seem to have erred, as I will discuss in my next post on this game.

Jun-10-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <KEG>, you obviously meant <the other> Schlechter.
Jun-11-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: <perfidious> What I clumsily tried to say was that Schlechter may have surmised that Janowski was so dejected at losing the first four games of the match that complicating the game might cause Janowski--in his fragile emotional state--to crash and burn again.

Sorry for any confusion I may have caused. Serves me right for trying to read the mind of someone who has been dead for over a hundred years!

Jun-11-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: Post III

19... Ra6?!

A most un-Schlechter like move, looking to attack and create a wild tactical scramble rather than focusing on moves to try to get a draw. As will be seen, Janowski did get knocked off kilter.

Schlechter's move left:


click for larger view

20. f4

This was one way to try to secure his pawn plus edge. 20. Rab1 was another good move.

Meanwhile, Schlechter--still not playing like Schlechter--continued on his wild venture with:

20... a4?!

Given his 19th move, 20...Rb6 looks most sensible (though Stockfish likes Schlechter's actual move here.

21. Rad1 Rb6


click for larger view

22. Bc1?!

Huh? With 22. Ne4 or 22. Kf1 (or may even 22. h3), Janowski should have good prospects to capitalize on what was probably a winning position for him. The text mangled his own position:


click for larger view

Now Schlechter--displaying his fine positional and tactical prowess--ignored the fact that his Knight was en pris and unleashed a tactical gem that, absent a later slip by Schechter, should have been sufficient to save the game for him.

22... a3!

This move deserves yet another diagram. It was the high point of this otherwise strange game:


click for larger view

The sequel is fun to play over:

23. RxN axb2

The point of Schlechter's 22nd move.

24. Bxb2 RxB
25. Re2 RxR
26. NxR


click for larger view

Schlechter was still a pawn down, but he had the superior pawn structure and excellent chances to save the game.

26... f6
27. Nd4 c6
28. Rd7


click for larger view

Whatever the theoretical status of the position, Schlechter still had plenty of work to do in order to be able to secure the draw.

28... fxe5

Forced.

29. fxe5 Rxe5
30. Rxb7


click for larger view

Schlechter now faced a crucial decision on whether to keep the minor pieces on the board. I will discuss his choice and its consequences in my next post on this game.

Jun-12-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: Post IV

Schlechter now had three choices: (A) reduce to a Rook and pawn ending down a pawn with 30...Bc5; or (B) counter-attack and go after the White c-pawn with 30...Re3; or (c) target the White a-pawn with 30...Ra5. To make matters tougher for him, this was his last move before the move-30 time control.

This may all sound exciting, but Stockfish is bored silly, having calculated that all of this move--with best play--lead to a draw. In fact, Stockfish finds nothing interesting in the balance of this game.

With apologies to the computer gods, I prefer to consider the game from a human perspective, and I will ignore our silicon friends for the balance or my analysis of this Game #5.

30... Bc5

I prefer active play and probably would have tried 30...Re3. Schlechter, however, put his trust in his ability to draw the Rook and Pawn ending his move forces.

31. Kf2 BxN+

31...Rd5; 31,,,Rf5+; and 31...Rh5 were all alternative possibilities. But Schlechter had decided how he would try to hold the game...without minor pieces.

32. cxR Ra5


click for larger view

33. Rb2

The only chance to play for a win.

33... Ra3

Confining White's King, at least for now, to the first and second ranks.


click for larger view

34. Rc2 Kf7
35. Ke2


click for larger view

35... Ke7

More enterprising and perhaps a better practical way to try to draw lay in 35...Ke6! This allows White to take the c-pawn with check, but Black then gets better counter-play with his king after 36. Rxc6+ Kd5.

36. Rxc6 Rxa2+
37. Kf3 Rd2


click for larger view

38. Rg6

Tantamount to offering a draw. Once the White d-pawn bites the dust, the game--as has been pointed out by <offramp> on this site nearly three years ago--is a clear draw.

38... Rxd4
39. Rxg7+ Kf6


click for larger view

As Muller and Konoval have pointed out in their book on Rook Endgames, Rook plus g and h pawns against Rook and h-pawn all on the same side of the board can in some instances yield a win for the superior side, but not where the Rook and King of the defending side have active play and are not cut off. The diagrammed position, however, is indeed a "well-known draw" (quoting <offramp>). Janowski, perhaps out of frustration, played on through move 57, but this was a waste of time.

The final position after 57...Ra4 was:


click for larger view

Drawn

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC