Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Aron Nimzowitsch vs Karl Behting
Riga Offhand game (1919), Riga RUE, Jul-10
Latvian Gambit: Accepted. Nimzowitsch Attack (C40)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 32 times; par: 48 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Nimzowitsch/K Behting games
sac: 19.Nxd5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can display posts in reverse order, by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page and checking the option "Display newest kibitzes on top."

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-22-08  Ulhumbrus: 21 f6 clears the square f5 which White can use to attack the pinned N on d5 a third time by 22 Rf5.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: An offhand game played in Riga, Latvia on July 10, 1919.

Nimzowitsch annotated the game in <Mein System>, pg. 103.

Dec-13-16  zanzibar: Chernev calls this game a "brilliant piece of instruction" showing "the power of a blockader in simple, classic style".
Dec-15-16  zanzibar: Nimzowitsch introduces the game, after 2...f5, thusly:

<The opinion of Karl Behting, which I [Nimzo] am inclined to support, is that this move is quite playable.>

from Skjoldager/Nielsen's tranlation.

Mar-30-19  jenspetersson: Could anyone explain to me why the openings encyclopedia ECO doesn't refer to this game after 9.c4 ( ⩲)? Instead it refers to less known US players from a game in the 1980's.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: ***

Hi Jens,

They like to quote a more recent game as that, in theory, should show up any improvements for either side.

A move may have been ⩲ in the 1940's but is it still ⩲ today? So, if they can, they find a more modern reference.

You are appear to be doing the correct thing, examining and questioning rather than just nodding.

I have the 1995 book 'ECO Busted'.

"535 Refutations, Re-evaluations, Novelties, Improvements and Corrections to the Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings."

Keep questioning and examining...


Mar-30-19  sneaky pete: The second (1981) edition of ECO volume C refers to this game up to 9.c4 .. with the same evaluation sign. Why would one mention a repeat of those moves by two Ussians in a later edition? ECO doesn't give full games, just fragments. The evaluation of the position reached after nine moves wasn't changed. I see no additional value at all in referring to other players who at a later date copied some moves from N vs B.

It's customary to refer to the oldest (known) game with a series of moves, regardless of the evaluation of the resulting position. Only new moves, that force us to re-evaluate the position, will lead to new example games. That is not the case here.

Apart from that, Behting should remain Behting.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
G49 in Chess Highlights of the 20th Century by Graham Burgess
from Published Games by Year and Unconfirmed Source 4 by fredthebear
Nimzowitsch Attack 3.Ne5 Qf6 6.Ne3
from C40 Latvian Gambit I by listen50s
Ah Sweet Mystery of Nimzowich!
from Solitaire Chess by I. A. Horowitz by SirIvanhoe
Game 12
from My System (Nimzowitsch) by jgrob12
Latvian Gambit: Accepted. Nimzowitsch Attack (C40) 1-0 Pins
from Ne5 Holler of a Tree in Fredthebear Country by fredthebear
partida 14
from mi sistema patidas by viniloangel
Game 12
from My System (Nimzowitsch) by neontheorist
Game 2
from Golden Dozen (Chernev) by Retarf
Chess Highlights of the 20th Century (1/3)
by rbaglini
mi sistema de nimzovich
Part III - Illustrative games
from Nimzovich's My System - Part III Illustrative Ga by chevalierviolet
Solitaire Chess by Bruce Pandolfini
by SirIvanhoe
Chess Highlights of the 20th Century (1/3)
by 50movesaheadofyou

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC