Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Frantisek Rous vs Jan Cervenka
Prague tch 2000/ (2001), rd 1, Jan-11
Italian Game: Evans Gambit. Anderssen Variation Cordel Line (C51)  ·  0-1



explore this opening
find similar games 69 more games of J Cervenka
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <The BB> Not stupid at all. If you scroll through the comments you'll notice a lot of people had the same problem.
Feb-28-07  zb2cr: Way to go Honza! This is a very neat trick!
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: <Honza Cervenka: <arminsson><but what if white simply takes the Rook and then checks with his own Rook, so as to force blackīs king away from the 1. row?> Where do you want to check with white Rook after 60.Kxf4 f2?>

I suspect that this kibitzer (like others who were disoriented regarding the direction in which the Black pawns advance) forgot that the Black pawn on b6 controls the c5-square. If there were no Black pawns attacking squares on the fifth rank somewhere from the a- to e-files, this idea (59. ... Rf4 60. Kxf4 f2 61. Rc5+, etc.) would indeed seem to be a saving resource that would hold a draw for White. But, in the actual position, White has no useful checks, so the interference tactic (59. ... Rf4) is totally winning for Black. Nicely done!

Feb-28-07  nikolajewitsch: Got this one surprisingly fast...although I could probably spoil the resulting endgame, letting one of the pawns pass or so....
Feb-28-07  nimzo knight: I got this one. Its shouldnt be a surprise to spot it quick, as there arent many options. But the point is could I have seen it in a game. Our just said to myself that its a draw.
Feb-28-07  Marmot PFL: Rc4 wins easily enough, it just takes a little longer. I would resign if my opponent played either move.
Premium Chessgames Member
  laskereshevsky: saw it in a glance.....
i love the simply positions.........:)
Feb-28-07  YouRang: I found it pretty quickly, but still it's a very cool puzzle. Nice work Honza! :-)

I guess 59...Rf4! would be considered a decoy? If 60. Kxf4, then the king has been drawn to a square where it blocks its own rook from stopping the promotion.

The black pawn on b6 plays a big role in preventing Rc5+.

Feb-28-07  ianD: Well played Honza!
Premium Chessgames Member
  gawain: Elementary yet lovely. I did see it, as (it seemed to me) it was the only possible move in the position--when presented as a PUZZLE.

But to have seen it over the board while moving rapidly is admirable. Kudos to Cervenka!

Feb-28-07  WarmasterKron: I got this surprisingly quickly. Obviously, Black intends to push the f-pawn. 59...f2? is met with 60.Rf5, so the interference 59...Rf4! suggested itself after I realised 60.Kxf4 f2 and the king is doomed to be one step behind.

Simple, elegant, effective. Good stuff, Honza.

Feb-28-07  DrKurtPhart:

Harrwitz vs Morphy, 1858

Feb-28-07  RonB52734: <radu stancu> thanks for having an eye on my comment

<consul> lest there be any misunderstanding, my little <very little> joke was meant out of respect for Honza, who did indeed make the move otb.

I'm sure some day one of my games will be a puzzle of the day. Unfortunately, I'm equally sure I will be "NN" with the black pieces in a "white to play and win" puzzle.

Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: The winning tactic is a little unusual,but is a simple KO like the average Monday puzzle.

59...♖f4!! If 60 ♔xf4 f2 and white has no checks and cannot stop the pawn and the king now blocks the f-file and ♖f5. Here is a variation on the theme:

click for larger view

White draws by: 1 ♖f5 ♔xf5 2 g4+ followed by ♔g2

Feb-28-07  cannibal: <kevin86>
Nice puzzle, but white also gets a rather easy (though not an immediate) draw with the bunker idea Rh3.
Feb-28-07  kbaumen: It was easy for me, but only because of the fact that few weeks ago I saw this idea in another puzzle - black to move and win:

click for larger view

Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: Fap! He's on Team White...
Premium Chessgames Member
  fm avari viraf: This little tactical blow 59...Rf4 may be there in Reuben Fine's Rook & Pawns Endings where either side can inflict a K.O.
Feb-28-07  Themofro: Got it eventually although it took me a while because i was distracted by Rc4. I beleive that that would also win however, is that true?
Feb-28-07  Akavall: <Themofro> Yeah, 59...Rc4 wins as well.
Feb-28-07  thedoyle: i saw this relatively quick also but i envisioned it 59.... Rxg4+ 60. Kf5 Rf4 [if 61. Kxf4 f2] and no way of stopping promotion.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <thedoyle: i saw this relatively quick also but i envisioned it 59.... Rxg4+ 60. Kf5 Rf4 [if 61. Kxf4 f2] and no way of stopping promotion.> I am afraid that 60.Kxg4 can be a little hole of this idea. Black Pawn f3 is not covering g4.:-)
Mar-02-07  arminsson: (Peligroso Patzer) How strange - and yes, you are correct. Itīs almost an optical illusion. a
Mar-02-07  Fisheremon: <consul: I missed it! :(
I was convinced 59 .. Rc4, with the threat of Rc5 would have worked, but then i realized that 60 Rd6 neutralizes it,>
< greensfield: Missed this one. Concentrated on (a)59...Rc4 continuing 60.Rd6 a4 61.Rxb6 Kd1 62.Rb1+ Ke2> 60...Rc5+ 61.Kg6 a4 62.Rxb6 a3 ( )
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <Fisheremon> <Although the rook ending was drawn: 55.Rd5? losing (55.Re5!?), so 56...f4! winning.> 55.Re5 would have been objectively a bit better as then black has not that trick used in the game but 55.Re5 Rxa4 56.Kxg6 f4 57.g4 (Alternatives 57.gxf4 Rxf4 58.Kxh5 Rxf3 or 57.Kxh5 fxg3 58.Rg5 Rc4 59,Rxg3 a4 do not solve white's problems as well) 57...hxg4 58.fxg4 f3 59.Kg5 Rc4! is still winning without doubts.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
59 negras
from puzzles by ALEXIN
59...? (Wednesday, February 28)
from Puzzle of the Day 2007 by Phony Benoni
from Soņar no cuesta nada by Chess Guevara
fm avari viraf's favorite games
by fm avari viraf
end games
by senankit
rook + 4 pawns vs rook + 4 pawns
from Instructive chess endgames I by Jaredfchess
59...? (February 28, 2007)
from Wednesday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
rook + 4 pawns vs rook + 4 pawns
from Instructive chess endgames I by wwall
R's - promotion tactics
from Endgame paradigms by Gypsy
Great Rook Sac Wins
from Endgames Worth Seeing by Grampmaster
5:4 --> ||2:1 + 3:3||
from 96b_The Unbearable Lightness of rook endgames 2 by whiteshark
59...? (Wednesday, February 28)
from POTD Evans Gambits by takchess
Black's 59th move: fantastic
from Ghizza's favorite games by Ghizza

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC