chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Emanuel Lasker vs Annie Mabel Gooding
"Not so Gooding" (game of the day Dec-29-2005)
Simul, 25b (1908) (exhibition), Cheltenham ENG, Feb-19
French Defense: Winawer. Advance Variation General (C16)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1,375 more games of Lasker
sac: 11.Bxf5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-29-05  Devilz: Nice queen sac and attack.
Dec-29-05  khense: CANT be sound! (but black had to move every time the grandmaster came around).
Dec-29-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: No way is this sacrifice sound. Can't be. After 15...Kd7; 16.0-0-0,c7-c6 Black will follow with Kd7-c7, ...Bc8-d7, ...Ra8-c8 and Kc7-b8, with artificial castling followed by the c6-c7 pawn break to open the c-file. If White tries to annoy Black with Nc3-a4, then ...b7-b6 should be OK, as While lacks the light-squared Bishop.

However, this is a fantastic example of the sort of madness you might find during a game, and Lasker no doubt counted on his opponent to make mistakes. And that is one heck of a finish.

Dec-29-05  Hidden Skillz: i bet he wouldnt done the sac against a master
Dec-29-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: White sacked his ♕ on spec. It took 20 moves before the payoff. 22...Be2 was a bad bad mistake. Two moves later black realized how much trouble he was in and tried to give back the ♕. And Lasker wouldn't take it!
Dec-29-05  lentil: i think you are being charitable in assuming it was a sac. looks to me like L just blundered away the Q (it was a simul, after all) abut played on because he had 2 pieces and an initiative against a much weaker opponent.
Dec-29-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Black was the Great Britain Gooding, not the Cuba Gooding.
Dec-29-05  dakgootje: LOL what a finish =) And indeed that sac (or mistake) just couldnt be sound. So i can only conclude that it is a really nice game =)
Dec-29-05  itz2000: 25 BF6+ could have been a mistake I think.

Why not
25 BE7+ and take his queen out in case King goes to KF7?

Dec-29-05  itz2000: after 29 .. Ke1.
30 Rg1+ ; Bf1
31 Rfxf1!; Ke2
32 Re1!; ...
Dec-29-05  alphee: <itz2000> I keep asking me the same question about ♗e7+ attaking the queen and the rook as it's what I would have done. Is there any reason to avoid this move. I did not have the time to ask Fitz...
Dec-29-05  DanRoss53: Is this definitely a Queen sac by White? I think 9. ♗d2? could have been a blunder... after 9... ♘g6! 10. ♕g5 ♗e7! White can't save his Queen. It's hard to imagine Lasker could have missed such a shallow combination, but I wouldn't rule it out completely.
Dec-29-05  EmperorAtahualpa: Great GOTD! I think a game like this should make good kibitzing, because it contains so many questionable moves.

Now to the game itself:

9.Bd2?? is White's first serious mistake, because the bishop is taking the Queen's only retreat square after 9...Ng6.

I think Black's first serious mistake is 17...c5??, because it allows 18.Nb5. That's where the real trouble starts I think! Better would be 17...c6 or even 17...Ba6.

I also have my doubts about 20...hxg4?? I feel it facilitates White's attack on the already vulnerable kingside.

<itz2000> <alphee> I agree 25.Bf6+?? is questionable. An improvement would be 25.Be7+ but I think even better would be 25.Bh6+! Kf7 26.Rg7+! Ke8 27.exd6 taking the extra g-pawn.

Finally, 27...Kf3?? leads to an inevitable mate. 27...Ke3 28.Rg3+ Bf3 could have saved the game somewhat, although Black is already in a terrible position.

I liked this game exactly because of its many questionable moves. It was a nice exercise for me to practice my analysing skills.

Dec-29-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Too bad the game wasn't in Cuba,lol.

A nice attack and sac by Mr.Lasker. He even managed to deliver a mating sequence without taking back the queen.

Dec-29-05  DanielBryant: Yeah, too bad it wasn't Capablanca that played him!
Dec-29-05  Al Notation: yeah, I am not sure about whether it was a sac or not. many here have shared my thoughts. it looks like Lasker didn't see the trap, and afterwards Gooding was too excited to play well. with his material advantage he should have confronted Lasker on the kingside. I wonder if 12...Ne7 would have been better.
Dec-07-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Mrs. Gooding, actually.

From a simul in Cheltemham, England on February 10, 1908.

Lasker scored +23=2-0 of 17 games.

Jan-21-16  patzer2: Deep Fritz 15 indicates <Al Notation>'s suggestion 12...Ne7! (-1.92 @ 22 depth) gives Black a decisive advantage.

As such, Lasker's 9. Bd2? was a blunder and 9...Ng6! initiates a winning combination to snare the trapped Queen.

After the game continuation 12...Qd7?, allowing 13. Bxg6 fxg6 14. Nh4 (-1.14 @ 23 depth) White got back into the game, soon equalized and then gained a decisive advantage.

This game, with the missed opportunity 12...Ne7! , illustrates the importance of capitalizing on won positions by playing the strongest follow-up moves.

Jan-21-16  RookFile: People tend to relax when they have the advantage. The better thing to do is slow down and bear down.
May-20-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: <TheFocus: Mrs. Gooding, actually.

From a simul in Cheltemham, England on February 10, 1908.

Lasker scored +23=2-0 of 17 games.>

Miss Gooding. Date is February 19th. 23+2-0=25.

Jun-29-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Stonehenge: Annie Mabel Gooding?
Jun-29-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  fredthebear: This game looks something like a helpmate! FTB must mention the two White knight sacrifices initiating the mating sequence (made possible by weakening Black pawn moves). The synchronicity of the White rooks is superb!

Yes, Lasker's queen gets trapped (most of us would have played the routine 9.Bd2 there, certainly in a simul), but White gets two minor pieces, inflicts doubled pawns, and achieves a useful bishop outpost as compensation (but not w/best play by Black as pointed out by Al Notation). Improvements are available in most chess brilliancies, yet we can still appreciate the execution of seizing one's chance.

It's the fault of the early queen trap that holds back this beautiful finishing combination as being on par with another famous Lasker king walk (initiated by a queen sacrifice) to the back rank: Ed. Lasker vs G A Thomas, 1912

With the added burden of a simul, it seems that Emanuel had to work a bit harder than Edward, but both were wise to bare all their pieces upon the exposed king.

Nov-10-19  mifralu: <Stonehenge: Annie Mabel Gooding?>

http://www.spraggettonchess.com/las...

Oct-28-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  fredthebear: Here's the video link: https://www.bing.com/videos/search?...

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: EXHIBITION. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Cheltenham (+23 -0 =2) 19.02.1908
from Lasker's Great British Tour (1908) by MissScarlett
French Def: Winawer. Advance General (C16) 1-0 Brilliant!!
from FrenchD b6 or Nc6 by fredthebear
NN
from 52c_Middlegames_2 minor pieces for a Queen by Jaredfchess
French Def: Winawer. Advance General (C16) 1-0 Brilliant!!
from yQThee Queen is Mean Vol. 5 so says Fredthebear by fredthebear
Queen Sacrifices -3
by obrit
the informal Lasker
by ughaibu
questionable sacs in simul game
from study for tactics by trh6upsz
December 29: Not so Gooding
from Game of the Day 2005 by Phony Benoni
Beautiful Mating Patterns
by jasonspezza
ughaibu's bookmarked games
by ughaibu
bengalcat47's favorite games5
by bengalcat47
French Def: Winawer. Advance General (C16) 1-0 Brilliant!!
from Decoy to, Deflect from, Remove Fredthebear 4 by trh6upsz
A crushing attack by Lasker....(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 2 by xajik
A crushing attack by Lasker....(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 2 by Trigonometrist
Lasker Mate Brillanteze
from Ignacio Landa's favorite games by Ignacio Landa
questionable sacs in simul game
from study for tactics by old coot
NN
from 52c_Middlegames_2 minor pieces for a Queen by whiteshark

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC