chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Bowie vs Emanuel Lasker
"Let's Dance" (game of the day Feb-24-2019)
Simul, 26b (1913) (exhibition), Krefeld GER, Oct-16
Spanish Game: Berlin Defense (C65)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1,244 more games of Lasker
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-15-08  Tomlinsky: Time is waiting in the wings,
It speaks of senseless things,
Its script is you and me.
Aug-18-08  myschkin: . . .
booyyy
Dec-09-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: From a simul in Krefeld, Germany on October 16, 1913.

Lasker scored +22=3-1.

Jan-11-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: <Bowie Knifed>
Feb-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  OrangeTulip: Ground control to major Lasker
Feb-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: Why is this game over?

White is a ♙ down. I wouldn't want to play out an ending against Lasker a ♙ down, but I wouldn't have quit just yet.

Feb-24-19  shivasuri4: More likely that the game score is incomplete.
Feb-24-19  goodevans: What dipstick would suggest a GOTD based on the pun alone without first checking the game through?
Feb-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Pop culture is sexier than good chess.

<Whyld (1998)> has <27...Qxc4 and wins>, citing the <Krefelder Zeitung 8-11-13>.

Feb-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sargon: Sorry guys, I didn't have time to review this game in depth. I was pressed for time for a pun, so I just grabbed tone at random from the "lucky bucket"—and wasn't very lucky, unfortunately.

Maybe this will inspire someone to see if there's a more complete game score. Even if there IS, I'd imagine that it's just probably an endgame where Lasker is up a pawn over an amateur, who consequently gets systematically and decisively crushed...

Feb-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  jith1207: Ah, what happened to the convention of having the suggested user name in the GOTD along with the pun? I thought it gave nice congrats to each user in the home page.
Feb-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Success has many fathers; failure is an orphan.
Feb-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: ***

Final Position (White to play).


click for larger view

I'd rather be White, 1.Re7 the pawn minus means nothing due to the activity and the control of the open files.

Already I can see 1.Re7 Rf7? 2.b3 1-0.

If Ken Whyld could not dig out the remaining moves then I'd not waste too much time looking.

***

Feb-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Wouldn't go that far. I just submitted a game for which Whyld didn't have the full score. That said, I doubt the <Krefeld Zeitung> had many competing titles.

I'd never even heard of Krefeld; it sounds incredibly dull: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krefeld

Feb-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I like the puns a lot and don't typically care as much about the quality of the games.
Feb-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: I like good puns a lot.
Feb-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Be nice to check if <Bowie> is the correct name; it doesn't sound very Germanic. <Boewe> I could go with.
Feb-24-19  GlennOliver: If Lasker himself had analysed this given end position, he would probably have declared it a draw with best play.

As has been noted, the likely scenarios are an incomplete pgn or a premature resignation by an overawed amateur.

Feb-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: This unfinished GOTD is getting more interesting than some other GOTD's.

It is possible there is a mistake in the notation and the resignation is legitimate.

But likely that Lasker having knocked out a fair chunk of the field was coming round quicker, White stopped recording the games, got flustered and dropped a Rook. White was doing OK till saw the mate with 14. Qh5 instead 14.Bb3 kept the lid on things.

Feb-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <Sargon: Sorry guys, I didn't have time to review this game in depth. I was pressed for time for a pun>.

It's way past time to deep-six the shabby business of choosing the Game of the Day on the basis of puns derived from anglophone mispronunciations of players' names. Such games are, on average, of mediocre interest. A different criterion is needed.

Why not require the GOTD to be one having some intrinsic interest that has *never previously been commented on*? The name of the CG member who nominates it can be posted, as is usually done now, thereby conferring pseudonymous celebrity on the nominator. Set up a "bucket" into which members can dump links to suggested games.

And if a chosen game turns out to be substandard (like today's), the responsible member will be identified. He will be inundated with catcalls and will slink away in embarrassment.

Feb-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sargon: Anyone who submits a pun should, I suppose, review the game for quality and accuracy to the best of their ability.

<A game between players who are grossly mismatched in strength, however, can still be a good game.> For example, if *I* was able to—in a simul, say—play a GM and get to the endgame in anything approaching an equal position, such as being only a pown down (knowing I would lose the endgame regardless) I'd consider that a positive accomplishment in and of itself.

If this game score is complete, perhaps what happened is that this player "Bowie" concluded something akin to:

<"OK, I got to an endgame with Lasker, and I'm down only ONE pawn. I obviously have no chance to outplay him from this point, so I'll graciously resign and consider my participation a qualified success.">

With that in mind, maybe my alternate pun "Under Pressure" would have been more apropos...

Feb-25-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: ***

'Under Pressure' would have worked.

"It's the terror of knowing what the world is about,

Watching some good friends screaming "Let me out!"

***

Hi Sargon,

We can go around in circles speculating what happened but I think if given the choice White would have played on. He has paid for the privilege of playing the world champion, he cannot see how he is losing, infact it's quite the reverse, White has all the chances. why resign?

If it ended now then I'd have a good shout that here.


click for larger view

He is waiting for Lasker to appear so has not written down his move.

Lasker appears, he moves. It's an awful blunder,something silly like 28.Qd1+ or 28.Re4, he resigns on Lasker prompt reply, does not record the last two moves and walks out in disgust.

They retrieve his score sheet from the waste paper basket, discover he not written down his name, someone says they think he's a farmer (which is Bauer in German hence the misspelt 'Bowie'.)

Sorted.

***

Feb-25-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: <<Whyld (1998)> has <27...Qxc4 and wins>, citing the <Krefelder Zeitung 8-11-13>.>

To clarify matters, or should I say, to further clarify matters, the expression <...and wins> generally indicates that a game continued. But the position itself speaks loudest - no chess player worthy of the name is going to resign that, especially when blessed enough to be facing the world champion.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: EXHIBITION. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Spanish, Berlin Def (C65) 0-1 Up one pawn in a sterile position
from Emanuel Lasker Collection by hrannar
4-Ruy Lopez
by webbing1947
February 24: Let's Dance
from Game of the Day 2019 by Phony Benoni
Spanish, Berlin Def (C65) 0-1 Up one pawn in a sterile position
from Spanish B Defense Bin Fed Fredthebear by fredthebear
Bowie's a song writer
from Special Games Part 4 by Brit
Spanish, Berlin Def (C65) 0-1 Up one pawn in a sterile position
from -ER Lasker by fredthebear
4-Ruy Lopez
by classicalwin2


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC