chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Shredder (Computer) vs Rybka (Computer)
WCCC 2006 (2006), Turin, rd 3, May-26
Scotch Game: Scotch Gambit. Advance Variation (C45)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 31 times; par: 94 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 12 more Shredder/Rybka games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can make these tips go away by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Simply check the option "Don't show random tips on game pages." and click the Update Profile button at the bottom.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-30-06  Montreal1666: They should have entered the regular Rybka as well.
May-30-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Rybka is in Iceland.
May-30-06  jamesmaskell: Rybka's good, but it isnt a computer, though he played like one in 1972 and 1992...
Jun-02-06  Dionyseus: Bad opening which allowed for a position which Rybka does not play well.

According to Chessbase 9, 14...Nxd2 was played 13 times, lost 6 times, won once, and drew 6 times, so basically it has scored 31% for black.

16...Rb8 is a novelty. In 1993 Kreutzkamp rated 2220 played 16...0-0 against Voigt rated 2305, and managed to win. Here's the game: [Event "Hamburg-ch"]
[Site "Hamburg"]
[Date "1993.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Voigt, Martin"]
[Black "Kreutzkamp, Hans Rudolf"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C56"]
[WhiteElo "2305"]
[BlackElo "2220"]
[PlyCount "98"]

1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d4 exd4 4. Nf3 Nc6 5. e5 d5 6. Bb5 Ne4 7. Nxd4 Bd7 8. Bxc6 bxc6 9. O-O Bc5 10. f3 Ng5 11. Be3 Bb6 12. f4 Ne4 13. Nd2 Nxd2 14. Qxd2 c5 15. Nf3 c6 16. c3 O-O 17. Qf2 c4 18. Bd4 Qc7 19. a4 Rab8 20. Nh4 f6 21. a5 Bxd4 22. cxd4 fxe5 23. dxe5 Rb5 24. Qe2 Rxa5 25. Rxa5 Qxa5 26. f5 c3 27. bxc3 Qxc3 28. e6 Be8 29. g4 c5 30. Nf3 d4 31. Qe5 Qb4 32. e7 Rf7 33. Ng5 d3 34. Nxf7 Qxg4+ 35. Kf2 Qh4+ 36. Ke3 Qh5 37. Nd6 Qe2+ 38. Kf4 Qxf1+ 39. Kg3 Qg1+ 40. Kh4 Qf2+ 41. Kh3 Qf3+ 42. Kh4 g5+ 43. Kxg5 Qh5+ 44. Kf4 Qxh2+ 45. Ke4 Bc6+ 46. Qd5+ Bxd5+ 47. Kxd5 Qh5 48. Ke6 d2 49. Ne4 Qf7+ 0-1

Jun-02-06  LIFE Master AJ: I guess Rybka still has some bugs ...

It hardly looks like the program that is "more than 100 points ahead of all the others" ... on some of these rating lists.

Jun-04-06  CapablancaFan: Shredder making some deep moves in this game. At first, I could'nt see the purpose of the move 19. f6 pawn sacrafice, but after 20.Bh6! in took me 20 to see Shredder had prepared a deep continuation if 21...Re8? 22.Ng5! and an amazing attack follows. I give Rybka credit for "seeing" the above line and playing 20...c4+! as it was necessary to position this bishop to defend the rook on f8. Obviously it wasn't enough to save the game, but it allowed Rybka to put up some resistance as long as it could. Shredder is a great chess program!
Jun-07-06  LIFE Master AJ: Rybka got "shredded," sorry, I have used that pun before.

On a serious note, I am very surprised that Rybka allowed White such a far-advanced pawn-duo. 18...Rb7? was a terrible move, there was no way that White's Pawn could be allowed to travel to f6.

I have Shredder 9.0, how much does this program differ from that one???

Jun-07-06  Dionyseus: <Life Master AJ> <I have Shredder 9.0, how much does this program differ from that one???>

According to the CCRL list, Shredder 10 is about 36 elo higher than Shredder 9. If they played a 50 game match, the expected score would be 27.5-22.5 in favor of Shredder 10. http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccr...

In the CCRL Shredder 10 vs Shredder 9 38 game match, Shredder 10 won by a score of 21-17, which is what it was expected to score.

If you click on Shredder 10, it will show you the opponents it has played against, and the scores. For example, Shredder 10 lost to Rybka 1.1 by a score of 11-19.

Jun-10-06  psmith: <Life Master AJ> The interesting question is what would you play as Black on move 18? How do you stop white from playing f6? I agree that 18...Rb7 looks weak, but really, can you criticize it if you can't provide a better alternative?
Jun-10-06  psmith: (CONT) It begins to look as if the f6, Bh6, Ng5 line wins against almost anything, perhaps 18...f6 is forced, but then simply 19. e6 is obviously very strong for White.
Jun-10-06  psmith: An aside: after 19. f6 if Black plays 19...g6 White has a winning plan with 20. Bh6 followed by Qd2, Bg7, Qh6 and Ng5. Fritz 5.32 (all I have) does not seem to be able to find this plan. But it soon recognizes it as winning when it is played against it from this position. I think this plan wins in all lines (and is pretty obvious). How do newer engines fare with this? And am I right?
Jun-12-06  LIFE Master AJ: Looking carefully at some of the previous moves (without a computer), I would have to try and blockade that f-pawn ... maybe as early as move 16 for Black.
Jun-20-06  whatthefat: <LMAJ: 18...Rb7? was a terrible move, there was no way that White's Pawn could be allowed to travel to f6.

Looking carefully at some of the previous moves (without a computer), I would have to try and blockade that f-pawn ... maybe as early as move 16 for Black.>

As <psmith> says, you can't really criticize the 18th move if the mistake is made earlier. As I posted above, I still think that 17...c4 and 17...f5 are worth a look.

Jul-21-06  JustWoodshifting: I used Chessmaster 10th Edition (The King 3.33 chess engine) to take up the game after the 17th move: 18. f4-f5 Rf8-e8
19. f5-f6 d5-d4
20. Be3-f2 Bd7-g4
21. Qc2-d2 g7xf6
22. Q-f4 Bxf3
23. e5xf6 K-h8
24. Qxf3 Q-d5
25. Qxd5 c6xd5
26. c3xd4 c5xd4
27. a2-a4 d4-d3
28. Ra1-d1 Bxf2+
29. Rxf2 R-b4

The time was set to 6 hours per side.
I'll try it out after Black's 16th move next + post it later. I agree that this was not typical Rybka. Thanks for the great commentary so far, guys.

Jul-21-06  psmith: <RandomVisitor> Interesting that you haven't chimed in on this one yet.

I am still interested in this question: after 19. f6 g6, can one of the newer engines find my plan: Bh6, Qd2, Bg7, Qh6, Ng5? Or is there a hidden defense to 20. Bh6 that I am missing?

Jul-22-06  JustWoodshifting: Re: Whatthefat: May-28-06:
My brother & I took your suggestion of 17---c5-c4. We played it out using Chessmaster Tenth Edition on our computers. Result was a draw after the 39th move. Thanks for the suggestion.
Jul-24-06  whatthefat: <JUstWoodShifting>
Thanks for that. I think it's at least an improvement over Rybka's 17...0-0.
Aug-18-06  spirit: no matter how strong a computer or even a human is he'll have weaknesses in evaluating some positions.me very sure that herr fritz will beat hydra in certain positions (though few)that we've not seen yet
Jul-06-07  RandomVisitor: The move 17...g6 stops the white f-pawn and equalizes.

White obtained a definite advantage after 18.f5. Black had intended to play 20...Re8 and 21...Re8, but both these moves are busted by Ng5.

Summary: a bad choice in opening book lines gets Rybka its 2nd loss in competitive play. See Spike-Rybka from 2005 for the other loss.

Jul-06-07  RandomVisitor: After 12...Qb8!? we have:

1: Shredder (Computer) - Rybka (Computer), WCCC 2006 Turin 2006


click for larger view

Analysis by Rybka 2.3.2a mp:

(21-ply)
1. = (-0.05): 13.Qc1 Bxd4 14.Bxd4 c5 15.Bf2 0-0 16.Nd2 Nxf2 17.Rxf2 Qb6 18.b3 a5 19.a4 Rab8

2. = (-0.07): 13.b3 0-0 14.Qd3 Qb7 15.Nd2 f5 16.Nxe4 fxe4 17.Qd2 a5 18.c3 Ba7 19.a4 Rad8

Jul-06-07  RandomVisitor: After the suggested improvement 16...Qe7

1: Shredder (Computer) - Rybka (Computer), WCCC 2006 Turin 2006


click for larger view

Analysis by Rybka 2.3.2a mp:

(20-ply)
1. = (0.11): 17.a4 c4 18.Bxb6 axb6 19.Qe3 Ra6 20.Nd4 0-0 21.f5 f6 22.e6 c5 23.Nb5 Ra5

2. = (0.10): 17.b4 cxb4 18.cxb4 Bxe3+ 19.Qxe3 0-0 20.a3 a5 21.Qc3 Ra7 22.Nd4 Rb8 23.Rab1 axb4

3. = (0.09): 17.Qf2 Rb8 18.a4 c4 19.Nd4 Bc7 20.Rab1 0-0 21.b4 cxb3 22.Nxb3 Bb6 23.Bxb6 axb6

4. = (0.06): 17.Qc2 g6 18.Qf2 Rb8 19.Nd2 0-0 20.Rfe1 Rfd8 21.Nb3 c4 22.Nc5 Bf5 23.b3 Qe8

5. = (0.06): 17.Rae1 0-0 18.h3 c4 19.b3 Bf5 20.Bxb6 axb6 21.Nd4 Qd7 22.bxc4 dxc4 23.Rf2 Rfd8

Oct-23-07  Kwesi: I reckon this game demonstrates the soundness of one of my many pet blitz weapons, the urusov gambit.
Oct-23-07  psmith: <Kwesi> How can it demonstrate that? The gambit was declined with 4...Nc6. This game can only be irrelevant to the soundness of the gambit.
Sep-17-08  Whitehat1963: Proof that there's still life in the Opening of the Day.
Jan-02-10  zanshin: Rybka 3 on Black's move 19:


click for larger view

[+0.60] d=17 19...c4 20.Qd2 Re8 21.Rae1 Bxe3 22.Rxe3 Qb6 23.Rf2 Bf5 24.Ree2 Bg6 25.Nd4 (0:06.00) 16564kN

...

[+0.41] d=15 19...gxf6 20.Rae1 fxe5 21.Nxe5 f6 22.Nd3 c4 23.Nc5 Rb8 24.Bd4 Bc8 25.Rf3 Qd6 26.Rg3 (0:01.13) 3462kN

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Two Knight's Defence
by Gato Gordito
Kwesi's favorite games
by Kwesi
See mate-in-five (28. ?) puzzle in my May 29, 2006 post
from Waiting Moves by patzer2
Shredder plays the scotch gambit advance variation
from Rainier Wolfcastle's favorite scotch games by Rainier Wolfcastle
If 21...Re8, then 22. Ng5!! fxg5 23. Rxf7! +- wins brilliantly
from Demolition of Pawn Structure: Sac on f7 (f2) by patzer2
If 21...Re8, then 22. Ng5!! fxg5 23. Rxf7! +- wins brilliantly
from Demolition of Pawn Structure: Sac on f7 (f2) by Del ToRo


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC