Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Newell Williams Banks vs Frank Marshall
"Checkered History" (game of the day Feb-27-2018)
Chicago (1926), Chicago, IL USA, rd 9, Aug-29
Formation: Queen Pawn Game: London System (D02)  ·  1-0



explore this opening
find similar games 1,383 more games of Marshall
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can make these tips go away by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Simply check the option "Don't show random tips on game pages." and click the Update Profile button at the bottom.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-13-09  LaFreak III: awooooo
Nov-26-09  RandomVisitor: Black could have won this with something like 44...Kh7 45.Kd4 Kg6 46.Nh2 Kf5 47.Ke3 e5, but after 50.a6! white has a winning position.
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Was Marshall hoping for an earthquake at the end, or feeling piqued after letting this slip away?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: He must have been hoping for 63.Qg3. Stalemate in a win in checkers and Banks might have forgotten which game he was playing.
Feb-27-18  RookFile: Very strange, this looked like a routine win for black. Marshall screwed up.
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Wasn't Mr. Banks a famous checkers champion?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gregor Samsa Mendel: Apparently Marshall gave up much of his advantage but was still winning when he played 47..axb5 instead of ..Ke7. He gave up the win with 48..Bd1 when he should have played ..e5. He was definitely lost after 49..Be2; The Computer says that ..Bb3 or ..Ke7 would have drawn. Poor Marshall swindled himself here.
Premium Chessgames Member
  ajk68: Marshall continually overlooked the value of forming the passed pair of pawns with e5.
Feb-27-18  nisharaj31: Why did black not play 33...h5?
Feb-27-18  dumbgai: Marshall gets a taste of his own medicine here, losing from a winning position.
Feb-27-18  morfishine: Apparently, Marshall forgot to play 33...h5 winning the Knight


Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: Nope, I think W could then either force a draw with 34 Qd8 (by perpetual or exchanging Qs when Black interposes on e8), or force ...Kh7 when White would play Qh4. In the latter case Black would be doing well, but he wouldn't win the Knight.
Feb-27-18  morfishine: <Dionysius> Yes of course (in my case, this is much easier to see with the board flipped), but at the least, Black is not losing
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <<Dionysius> I think W could then either force a draw with 34 Qd8 (by perpetual or exchanging Qs when Black interposes on e8), or force ...Kh7 when White would play Qh4. In the latter case Black would be doing well, but he wouldn't win the Knight.>

Stockfish 9 couldn't find a perpetual after 33...h5 34.Qd8+ unless Black cooperates by 34...Kg7 35.Qd8+. It evaluates the resulting position at [-1.74], d=38 after 34...Kh7 35.Qh4 Bd5 36.Kh2 Qc2+ 37.Qf2 Qxf2+ 38.Nxf2 (saving the knight but loosing a pawn) 38...Bxa2 39.Kg3 Bb1 40.Nd1 Kg6 41.Ne3 Bd3 42.Kf2 a5 43.Kf3 b5 44.Kg3 Be4 45.Kh4 a4 46.Kg3 Kf6 47.Kh4 g6 48.Kg3 g5 49.fxg5+ Kxg5 50.h4+ Kf6 51.Kf4 Bd3 52.Kg3 e5 53.Nd5+ Ke6 54.Nb4 Bf5 55.Kf2 Kd6 56.Ke2 Be4 57.Ke3 Bd5 58.Nxd5 Kxd5 59.Kf2

click for larger view

Perhaps not an obvious win and, of course, that's a long line so the chances that the game would have followed it exactly are pretty slim. But from this position the FinalGen tablebase generator indicates that Black has a forced win in 6 to 10 moves following each of his 9 legal moves: 59...Kc4 (6), 59...e4 (8), 59...Kc5 (8), 59...b4 (9), 59...a3 (9), 59...Ke4 (10), 59...Kc6 (10), 59...Ke6 (10), and 59...Kd6 (10). So there's a good likelihood that it's curtains for White after 33...h5 34.Qd8+ but of course this is impossible to determine OTB>

But did you really mean to suggest 33...h5 34.Qd8+ Qe8?? (an instance of chess blindness? I understand, it happens to me all the time)? Per Stockfish 9 White then has a forced mate in 10 after 35.Qxe8+ Kh7 36.Qxe6 hxg4 37.Qxe4+ Kg8 38.Qe8+ Kh7 39.hxg4 g6 40.Qf7+ Kh8 41.Qxg6 a5 42.f5 b5 43.f6 a4 44.Qg7#

click for larger view

Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: N-no! Rest easy <AylerKupp> I was thinking of 33...h5 34. ♕d8+ ♔f7 35. ♕d7+ ♔f8 36. ♕d8+ and only then (to avoid going to the h file) 36...♕e8
Feb-27-18  daveinsatiable: Can someone explain to me why 50...bxa doesn't save the draw for black?

If 51. bxa it's clearly drawn or won for black, and if:

51. b6, surely Ba6 and the bishop can stop the b pawn whilst the king sweeps up the f pawn.

What am I missing??

Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: 51...♗a6 is impossible - there's a Black pawn there in that variation
Feb-27-18  morfishine: <daveinsatiable> After <51.b6> White wins because Black cannot play 51...Ba6: his own pawn is now on <a6>

and with <f3> covered, the b-pawn cannot be stopped


Feb-28-18  daveinsatiable: Doh! Thanks Dionysius and Morf! Been suffering from this kind of chess blindness a lot lately.
Feb-28-18  morfishine: <daveinsatiable> NP, maybe try the trick of flipping the board, sometimes things become much clearer that way


Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: <An Englishman: Good Evening: Wasn't Mr. Banks a famous checkers champion?>


Premium Chessgames Member
  WorstPlayerEver: SF gives 47... axb5 -3.35

47... Ke7 -6.65


48... Bd1= blunders the advantage away (48... e5 is winning), after 49... Be2 +15 (49... Bb3=), in other words: Black could've created 2 connected passers.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
bengalcat47's favorite games
by bengalcat47
Checkers champion beat chess champion
from Special Games Part 2 by Brit
February 27: Checkered History
from Game of the Day 2018 by Phony Benoni
Masters Tournament, Round 9 (Sunday, August 29)
from Chicago Masters Tournament, 1926 by Phony Benoni
d4 : QGD : General
by ISeth
Clue #50
from Holiday Present Hunt Solutions: 2008 by Penguincw

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC