chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Boris Spassky vs Lajos Portisch
Spassky-Portisch Match (2007), Heviz HUN, rd 1, Apr-13
Spanish Game: Berlin Defense. l'Hermet Variation Berlin Wall Defense (C67)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 82 more Spassky/Portisch games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-30-07  Inf: they might be old, but those brains still play like it was the 60's.
Apr-30-07  AlfieNoakes: 47 ...Rc2+ Why does black not play bxb here, can anyone explain to me?
Apr-30-07  AlfieNoakes: Lovely play by Spassky though
Apr-30-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: <AlfieNoakes> I'd say that the position after 48.g4+ Kf6 49.Rxf4+ is easily won for White, with two extra pawns on the kingside.
May-01-07  Ulhumbrus: 14...Bxf3 relinquishes the bishop pair and Black's compensation for his doubled c pawn with it. Portisch does not succeed in devaluing Spassky's King side pawn majority, but how does Spassky make use of it? Some indication is given by the sequence of moves 27 e6+ Nxe6 28 Ne5+ Ke8 29 Nxg6! fxg6 30 Rxe6. The move 27 e6+ prepares clears the square e5 for the check 28 Ne5+ which takes a step towards the sacrifice 30Nxg6! and after 30 Rxe6 White has 3 pawns for Black's two with the difference that Black's twp [awns are vulnerable to attack. We can now summarize the meaning of the sacrifice 27 e6+! Its purpose is to exchange White's King side pawn majority of four pawns against three which seem not particularly vulnerable to attack for a King side pawn majority of three pawns against two which are more obviously vulnerable to attack. This matter warrants pondering.
May-02-07  evenua: Wow. Look at the White King after 53.Kc6. The enemy pawns and bishop are protecting his Majesty from further attack! =)
May-02-07  Philidor: <AlfieNoakes> Because of the pawn advancement after: 48.g4+.
May-02-07  goldenbear: Why does Portisch commit suicide? What was wrong with Be6?
Dec-19-08  patzer of patzers: <evenua> interesting, however it's 63.Kc6

<goldenbear> If you mean at the end of the game, well, it's illegal.

Aug-13-09  patzer of patzers: Hmm, half a year later, as I read my comment, it looks pretty stupid to me. I take it back; not the meaning behind it, necessarily, but the tone and the words used to convey it. I honestly have no idea what move <goldenbear> was talking about when he/she suggested Be6, but as it obviously was not move 66, my comment was rather dull-witted. I will, however, wonder to anyone who sees this what move <goldenbear> WAS talking about; I don't have the time to figure it out myself. Now, about the game, which should really be the center of the kibitzing anyway: I really like this game, because it's so simple compared to other high-level games. Not to say that there is any lack of skill, of course, I'm referring to how easy it is to understand most of the moves, even for a near (or straight up) beginner like me. All of the moves and their intentions are very clear.

(By the way, except for the first sentence, did I manage to sound somewhat like Edith Hamilton? I'm doing/dangerously ignoring in favor of CG a project on mythology and I think her style has gotten too much into my head.)

Aug-13-09  kurtrichards: So the result of the match between them (Spassky-Portisch) was a tie. I wonder if the result of the match between Kasparov and Karpov on September would be the same. Hmmm....
Nov-19-11  AnalyzeThis: Portisch played to make the h2 bishop a bad piece, but Spassky got it out of the box.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC