chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Lajos Portisch vs Boris Spassky
Spassky - Portisch Match (2007), Heviz HUN, rd 4, Apr-14
Dutch Defense: Classical. Stonewall Variation (A95)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 79 more Portisch/Spassky games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-30-07  MrMelad: 24..Nd3 What a blunder!
Apr-30-07  geraldo8187: Wow, I'm about 1000 elo below these guys and even i don't make mistakes like that any more. still, blundering a piece at this high level is just a temporary moment of blindness. i suppose at 70 i'll forget things now and again too.
Apr-30-07  Marmot PFL: Too bad, after 24...f4 black would have a promising position.
Apr-30-07  AlfieNoakes: Please tell me Spassky didn't do that!!??
Apr-30-07  sezori: Are you guys serious?! I know you guys seen what he was actually looking at. Nd3 exd Rxe1+ winning the rook the only thing is he overlooked the rook on a3. Or better yet he could've simply played c4 then Nd3 which would've then been a ?! or !? move. And yeah because of his age he missed it or it was simply an oversight, besides he's an ex-world champion. For all I care he can blunder for the rest of his life, but in his prime no one in the world could beat him, and I think that's better than one simple slip... :)
Apr-30-07  Cannon Fodder: Every decade or so he makes a move like this:

Spassky vs Karpov, 1988

Still, when you consider all the brilliant chess the man has given the world, these blunders are no more than an amusing footnote. Spassky will always be my hero.

Apr-30-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: Actually a bit oftener:
H Lieb vs Spassky, 1979
Apr-30-07  Dr.Lecter: Well, it's not the kind of thing that happens everyday, but all players make big blunders every once in a while. Spassky is also getting rather old, so his concentration level might have decreased or something.
May-01-07  Atking: I made this kind of mistake few times too. As Marmot noted 24. ...f4! wasn't a difficult move for Spassky and it gives an advantage to Black. Spassky make on me the impression he must have win this match. 70 years old and still very dangerous. Just remenber the result of Portisch in the last Gausdal. I can imagine Spassky making there 1/2 + better result just behind Carlsen.
May-01-07  MrMelad: Yes, 24..f4 seem to do it for black. If white take the f pawn, black can capture the h4 pawn, and other plans also seems to be at the least equal for black. Like 25. Rc1, or 25. Rd1 black answers 25..fxg3 and if 25.Rf1 black is total control and can choose his plan from various options. If 25. Qa5 black answers 25..Qd6 and he is also in a better position.

I find it hard to beleive that an ex-WC failed to find this simple move and commited a blunder not worthy of a less stronger player.

May-03-07  ahmadov: This game goes to my "great blunders" collection, I understand that age had something to do with it though...
Feb-21-09  WhiteRook48: 24...Nd3?? is just horrible
Feb-28-09  WhiteRook48: CRAZY GAME!
Mar-27-09  WhiteRook48: <24...f4> 25 gxf4, I might be missing something. Definitely better than <24...Nd3> anyway
May-01-09  WhiteRook48: the only reason that I think Spassky played 24...Nd3 is because he thought white would play 25 exd3 so he could play 25...Rxe1+.
Feb-09-13  KingPetrosian: Amusing how Spassky Could play such a move - offering a knight for free. I would think he would have considered all variations instead of being sure Portisch would attck with his pawn!
Jan-27-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: It was only yesterday, that I lost a game this (or in a similar) way.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Spassky's great blunder
from Great blunders by great GMs by ahmadov
24...Nd3?? Where'd that rook come from?
from Unbelievable Moves! (er, unbelievably bad ones) by 1. h4
World champions lose miniatures 2.
by ughaibu
A mistake which he won't make in the next 70 years?
from Grandmaster Blunders by alexmagnus
stonewall 1-0
from xfer's favorite games2007 by xfer
The Dutch Defense
by MadBishop
...Nd3?????????????????? hung a piece!
from Great masters losing by WhiteRook48
zumakal blunders archivadas1
by zumakal
World champion blunders
by TigerG
World champion blunders
by chessgain


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC