chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Gata Kamsky vs Boris Gelfand
World Championship Candidates (2007), Elista RUS, rd 2, Jun-08
Formation: Queen Pawn Game: London System (D02)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 47 more Kamsky/Gelfand games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-08-07  Karpova: Kamsky didn't play too well and was obviously unprepared for the opening he chose. Spent almost all his time on the first 15 moves and was down to about 9 min. Barely made the time control with his position completely messed up.

Still, good game by Gelfand!

Jun-08-07  erasmusdurer: Gelfand played a very smooth opening, gaining space and putting his pieces on good squares. He emerged from the opening slightly better than Kamsky. Kamsky couldn't make anything out of the positon in the middle game, where he made several questionable moves. Gelfand was impressive in this game.
Jun-08-07  micartouse: Black's creativity wasn't really tested in this game. His approach to the London System applies even at the class level: play ... c5 and ... cxd4 and you can get excellent queenside play. I'm sure White can greatly improve at several points.
Jun-08-07  mikejaqua: Wow! Kamsky really did not play well at all. Gelfand just played good, steady chess and let Kamsky hang himself.
Jun-08-07  djmercury: By following this game it looked like Kamsky wanted to gift Gelfand a point.
Jun-08-07  Monoceros: This is the first I've ever heard of the London System, truth to tell. The game reminds me a bit of what Reuben Fine had to say (little of it good) about the Colle System and similar openings where White doesn't answer ...d5 with c4. Fine asserts that, by allowing Black to play ...c5 for free, instead of making him work for it as is usual in Queen's Gambit Declined lines, you've allowed Black easy equality. Whether that's generally true I don't know but it certainly seems true in this game. Kamsky slips into a passive position quickly. I've never seen _White_ assailed with a queenside minority attack before.
Jun-08-07  Resignation Trap: Kamsky's line with 5.Bb5 is rare and, in my opinion, rather lame. More in keeping with the spirit of the London System is 5.c3.
Jun-08-07  IMDONE4: Once again, you see timid play from Kamsky who doesn't look as if he is out to win this. He really needs to start playing openings he knows and play with more conviction than he is doing now. As Resignation Trap stated, the 5. Bb5 variation is one that is quite uncharacteristic of Kamsky's style, and it is quite unfortunate that he played it.
Jun-08-07  Kangaroo: <Similar game was played <95 years ago> ... >

Nimzowitsch vs Alekhine, 1912 <with the <same> result (<Black won>)>

Jun-08-07  cotdt: Kamsky's openings are 100 years outdated
Jun-08-07  notyetagm: This is the worst game I have ever watched a GM play: poor opening prep, atrocious time management (10 minutes for 25 moves!), not resigning when down three healthy pawns for absolute zero compensation with the queens off the board so no perpetual, etc.
Jun-08-07  Softpaw: <djmercury: By following this game it looked like Kamsky wanted to gift Gelfand a point.>

Bingo!

Jun-09-07  Scarecrow: Worst time management I have ever seen. What the hell was Kamsky thinking here. Using more than half an hour for five moves (to come up with 5. Bb5...), an hour for ten, 1h50 for fifteen, 1h57 for twenty moves. He must have been trying to bore Gelfand to death or something.
Jun-09-07  Knight13: Yeah, this game is messed up. Not funny seeing a good player like Kamsky drop a bunch of pawns and getting beat up like this.
Jun-09-07  Scarecrow: Actually I missed the very beginning of this game, anybody knows how much time Kamsky used for 1. d4 ? :)
Jun-09-07  Monoceros: <Resignation Trap: Kamsky's line with 5.Bb5 is rare and, in my opinion, rather lame.>

GM Marin at Chessbase this morning calls it a "pseudo-active move". I've made the same mistake myself, pushing out a bishop to b5 (or equivalent) in an unfamiliar position, figuring it was an active place to develop it, only to be embarrassed later. But I never took twenty minutes to make that mistake. Twenty seconds, maybe.

Jun-09-07  Softpaw: Did Kamsky give any explanation for his bizarre performance in the post-game press conference??
Jun-09-07  cotdt: <Softpaw: Did Kamsky give any explanation for his bizarre performance in the post-game press conference??> Yes, but he spoke Russian so I do not know what he said.
Jun-10-07  IMDONE4: <Monocerus> and your not a 2700+ rated GM =)
Jun-10-07  notyetagm: Sad to think that this incredibly poor performance from Kamsky is probably going to cost him the match.

This game looks like me playing GM Gelfand in a simul. The only difference is that I would have resigned much sooner. ;-)

Jun-10-07  cotdt: Kamsky said that he felt really tired during that game. Perhaps he was drugged?
Jun-10-07  nolanryan: codt's comment got me thinking about conspiracy theories. But why would the Russians drug Kamsky and not Gelfand? Gelfand emigrated just as Kamsky did. the Mossad? I don't think it matters enough to involve the Mossad, and really, only Russian intelligence is retarded enough to get involved in chess.
Jun-14-07  Paul123: What the hell happened?

1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 [2.Bf4!? d5 3.e3 c5 4.c3 Nc6 5.Nf3 Qb6 6.Qb3 this is the modern way of playing the London with white having an opening advantage against 3...c5.

1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 d5 3.Bf4 c5!? 4.e3 Nc6 5.Bb5?! This does nothing to bolster the pawn at d4 (i.e. the center .... It is very critical in the London to keep the center intact and strong, then start play on the wings...Kamsky new this! what was he doing?

5...cxd4 6.exd4 Qa5+!? 7.Nc3 Bg4 8.0-0 8...e6 9.h3 Bxf3 10.Qxf3 Rc8 11.Rfd1 The pawn is weak and white must defend it 11...Be7 12.Bf1 0-0 and Black has equalizied.

Even with 8.h3 Bxf3 9.Qxf3 e6 10.0-0 Be7 11.Bxc6+ bxc6 12.Qd3 0-0 13.Rfe1 Qb4 14.Rab1 c5 the pawn at d4 is weak and white must attend to it...

5.Bb5?! clearly isn't a good idea

Jun-21-07  Cactus: Kamsky's openind was bad, and he didn't show his usual endgame brilliance.
Apr-23-08  DanielBryant: This can also be reached via the Exchange Variation of the Caro-Kann.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Semi-finals--Game 3: June 8th, 2007
from [Candidate Matches 2007]--Kamsky-Gelfand by chessmoron
Match Kamsky!
by amadeus
Match Gelfand!
by amadeus
London System (D02) 0-1 Also a C-K Exchange Var.
from London Bridges Fredthebear Crossed by fredthebear
London System (D02) 0-1 Also a C-K Exchange Var.
from Losker's NY System & Baltic Def for Fredthebear by fredthebear
D02 London System # 1 [Black]
by chess.master
126
from Gelfand's Games 4 Study by jakaiden
D02 London Crusher 2
by Dhamal Goda
D02 London Crusher
by Dhamal Goda
D02 London System # 1 [Black]
by WITZ2
Match Kamsky!
by xajik
D02 London System # 1 [Black]
by brucemubayiwa
Harrwitz Attack
by Adoryn
London System
by Adoryn
D02 London System # 1 [Black]
by Gerareis
D02 London System # 1 [Black]
by psherman31

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC