chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Robert Huebner vs Lubomir Kavalek
Amsterdam IBM (1975), Amsterdam NED, rd 6, Jul-14
King's Indian Defense: Saemisch Variation. Double Fianchetto (E82)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 12 more Huebner/Kavalek games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-27-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: Kavalek was in severe time trouble from move 22 onwards, having only 13 minutes left to reach the time control on move 40. He missed a draw with 28...♕c3+ 29.♔g4 h5 30.♔h4 g5+ 31.♔h5 ♕h8+ with perpetual check.
Jul-27-10  SufferingBruin: <GrahamClayton> Okay, I am beyond curious. What prompted this comment on a relatively unknown game played 35 years ago?
Jul-27-10  markwell: Unlike Kavalek, Mr. Clayton has entirely too much time on his hands.
Jul-27-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: <SufferingBruin>Okay, I am beyond curious. What prompted this comment on a relatively unknown game played 35 years ago?

<SufferingBruin>,
I have just bought a copy of Danny Kopec's book "Chess World Title Contenders and Their Styles". I found the Huebner v Kavalek game and annotations interesting, and thought that I would kibitz. Over 85% of the games in the database have no kibitzing, so rather than add a comment to a famous or well-known game, I would add a comment to a lesser known game. There must be a few interesting games that have received no kibitzes at all!

Jul-30-10  SufferingBruin: <GrahamClayton> Very cool. So, how is Kopec's book? Worth a purchase?
Jul-30-10  vonKrolock: <He missed a draw with 28...♕c3+ 29.♔g4 h5 30.♔h4 g5+ 31.♔h5 ♕h8+ with perpetual check.> Requested for a quick hint, my friend <The King>, running here in this (as Dr. Zachary Smith would express) <worthless electronic scrapheap> is not agreeing immediatelly with this statement ... It call ♕xc3 a two-and-half-pawn mistake, and suggest a saving methode for black starting with 28...h7-h5 <!?> - Yes, allowing white to ♕ his ♙ ... but keeping the white ♔ under serious threats that could ensure at least a perpetual

ps: but this is a fscinating gmae! I should recall from the Informator - 1975 was exactly the time when I followed international chess more closely ...

Jul-30-10  vonKrolock: <fascinating game> of course

28...♕xc3# 29.♔g4 h5+ ▢ 30.♔g5! (if 30.♔h4 then g7-g5!! with perpetual to follow, as remarked already) 30...♕d4 (best) and now


click for larger view

Black would really be winning if there was not - just & only - the fanstastic rejoinder 31.♘e2!! ♖xe2 32.♖d1!!! and white wins


click for larger view

This wonderfull double piece sacrifice was pointed out by <it>. No doubt that a Tal could find the amazing sequence over the board, and strong correspondence chess players possibly discover this with a thirty days per move pace and a lot of focus and midnight oil investment ...

BTW - The idea behind the ♘+♖ sac is - to be able to play ♔h6 with a mating net ... ♗And, as other methods fails ( like g2-g3 or ♘h3 instead of 31.♘e2!! in that line) - so this seems to be really a <problem like> combination

Jul-30-10  vonKrolock: <<28...♕xc3+ 29.♔g4 h5+ 30.♔g5 ♕d4 31.♘e2 ♖xe2 32.♖d1 <<<♖e5+>>> !?> analysis diagram


click for larger view

33.♔f6!! ▢, and - even allowing a double check - white wins after 33...♖f5+ 34.♔e7 etc...

Jan-09-18  Howard: Kavalek pronounced this encounter "the game of the tournament" in CL&R, back when it took place.

Certainly an entertaining game--no doubt about it.

Jan-10-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: REQUEST ANALYSIS


click for larger view

White to move

1) -0.40 (29 ply) 15.exd6 Rxd6 16.Nge2 Rb6 17.Qa7 Rxb2 18.O-O Bxc3 19.Nxc3 Qd4+ 20.Kh1 Qxc3 21.Qxc5 Be6 22.Rfc1 Qb4 23.Qxb4 Rxb4 24.Bd3 Rc8 25.Rc2 Rc5 26.Kg1 Kg7 27.Kf2 a5 28.g3 Rb6 29.Re1 Rd6 30.Be2 Kf6 31.Ke3 Rd7 32.a3 a4

2) -1.37 (29 ply) 15.Bc6 Nxc4 16.Bxd7 Qxd7 17.Rd1 Qf5 18.Qb3 Be6 19.Nge2 Ne3 20.Qa4 Nxd1 21.Qxd1 g5 22.g3 gxf4 23.gxf4 f6 24.exf6 Bxf6 25.O-O Rb8 26.Rf2 Kf7 27.Ng3 Qg4 28.Qxg4 Bxg4 29.Rc2 Bd4+ 30.Kg2 Be6 31.b3 c4 32.bxc4 Bxc4

3) -1.51 (28 ply) <15.Bd5?!> Nf5 16.Qb3 Nd4 17.Qa4 e6 18.Bf3 f6 19.O-O-O fxe5 20.Nge2 exf4 21.Nxd4 cxd4 22.Ne4 Rc7 23.c5 Bb7 24.Kb1 Bd5 25.Qxa6 Rc6 26.Qa3 Qa8 27.Qxa8 Rxa8 28.g3 fxg3 29.hxg3 Rxa2 30.b4

6.0 minute analysis by Stockfish 8 v270317

Jan-11-18  Howard: How about Kavalek's win over Ljubo in that same tournament. That one was also quite worthy of extensive analysis.
Jan-11-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: It is most unfortunate that time trouble rendered the finish prosaic, rather than one which could have proven highly entertaining indeed, as noted in some of the kibitzes.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 40
from Chess Title Contenders (Kopec/Pritchett) by Qindarka
Round 6 (July 14)
from Amsterdam IBM 1975 by Chessdreamer
An Active Repertoire for Black (Marovic)
by Chessdreamer
19.exd6 --> 26. d7
from 51- -> Birth and Power of a Central Passed Pawn by trh6upsz
19.exd6 --> 26. d7
from 51- -> Birth and Power of a Central Passed Pawn by whiteshark

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC