chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Harold Uuetoa vs Alvah Mayo
"Mayo Clinic" (game of the day Sep-12-2008)
Canada Day Open (1999), Dalhousie University/Halifax, rd 1, Jul-01
English Opening: Great Snake Variation (A10)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 31 more games of A Mayo
sac: 6...dxe3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-12-08  newzild: Maybe 9.Qb3 is a more serious test.

Sep-12-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gilmoy: 18.Rfb1 <cedes f3> Bxh3 :)
Sep-12-08  IT4L1CO: A rook can win against a knight an a bishop, but a bishop and a knight win against a queen. I really can't understand this game...
Sep-12-08  TheaN: <A rook can win against a knight an a bishop,>

...usually not. Points wise it's already more (3x2=6 > 5x1=5), but the main rule is that two pieces can coordinate better than one better piece, so in the case of N+B>R. In N+B<Q, this is different, as the Queen can hassle any coordination from the Bishop by controlling diagonals: in short, a Bishop can harass a Rook freely, but not a Queen.

<but a bishop and a knight win against a queen.>

So usually not.

<I really can't understand this game...>

It's vague how Black got to such an advantage, and indeed, I don't understand it either.

Sep-12-08  jack1501: i have a question that is off topic, does anyone remember yesterday's opening of the day? thanks
Sep-12-08  JG27Pyth: There's an amusing position that could arise in continuation from the final position.

Suppose white wants to struggle on and plays Qg8? -- threatening Qxh7+ ... Black responds Nf8! And now the Queen has _no_ moves. A maximum security prison from which there is no hope of escape.

Sep-12-08  YetAnotherAmateur: The reason black got such an advantage (as far as I can see) is that white spent a great deal of time shuffling the queen up and down the b file rather than dealing with the fact that black was still capable of hurting him.

The other big error I saw was leaving a nice large hole at d4.

Sep-12-08  Kasputin: Wow. Players from Nova Scotia. Now that is a surprise!
Sep-12-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Is the sacrifice sound? The proof of the pudding is in the eating-and this tastes great!

In exchange for the queen,black has-

two pieces,an open file to work with,a dragon bishop,and an exposed enemy king.

That may not add up to a queen,but in this case it worked. In another case,it might be somewhat different.

Sep-12-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Evidently, White forgot to hold the Mayo.
Sep-12-08  Riverbeast: This game is very Suttles-esque..I'm not surprised this game was played in Canada...I think Duncan Suttles influenced a lot of Canadian players with his creative ideas in the Modern
Sep-12-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  eternaloptimist: <Phony Benoni: Evidently, White forgot to hold the Mayo.> Lol, the funny puns just never stop from cg.com & the people that love it! :D Phony Benoni, u definitely ain't right. Yes, this game is very Suttles-esque; he was one of the most creative players of all time when he was active in trnts.
Sep-12-08  Riverbeast: There are other examples of sacrifices where two pieces and a pawn, as well as dark square control, overcame a queen.

Tal played a famous sacrifice (with similar compensation) in the kings indian, where he left his queen hanging on a5....Maybe someone remembers it

Sep-12-08  Cactus: I really don't get the pun.

In anycase it was a great game. I doubt when white played 6.Nd5 he expected 6...dxe3!?

Sep-12-08  erimiro1: It looks like Black has 3 benefits from the sac: the long diagonal a1-h8, the uncomfortable place of the white king and the semi open "a" line. That's all? No. White was completely shocked and confused by the sac, and failed to find the best defence. I can't see the great masters of defence Steinitz, Capablanca and Petrosian lose such a game.
Sep-12-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  eternaloptimist: <Cactus: I really don't get the pun.> They are non-profit medical practices & are located in several different places around the United States.
Sep-12-08  algol: <jack1501: i have a question that is off topic, does anyone remember yesterday's opening of the day? thanks> May be the Tarrasch variation of the Queen's Gambit Declined... Not sure, I looked in the history of my internet browser for access to the Opening explorer and it is the only opening I accessed on this site on 9/11...
Sep-12-08  drukenbishop: hello gang! i also have an amusing position that could arise in continuation from the final position.

Suppose white wants to struggle on and plays Qa3? -- threatening black's rook ... Black responds RxQ!!! And now the Queen has been captured. A true hoodwink which there is no hope of escape.

Sep-13-08  ajile: This game wasn't a Uuetopia for White.
Sep-14-08  TheaN: <hello gang! i also have an amusing position that could arise in continuation from the final position.

Suppose white wants to struggle on and plays Qa3? -- threatening black's rook ... Black responds RxQ!!! And now the Queen has been captured. A true hoodwink which there is no hope of escape.>

XD. I think <JG27Pyth>'s line was a tiiiny bit more logical for the reason why White resigned.

Sep-14-08  drukenbishop: you and I have VERY different meanings of 'logical'!!!
Sep-19-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  eternaloptimist: <ajile: This game wasn't a Uuetopia for White.> Like I posted earlier, the funny puns just never stop!
Sep-20-08  mack: Mayo is a member of this site and has acknowledged the influence of Suttles on several occasions.
Sep-25-08  NMAlvahMayo: Hmmm, where to begin.... I played Black in this game and I have a number of thoughts on this game. I have no doubts that the line as played was completely justified and correct from Black's perspective and leads to an advantage.

White's problems begin with the move 4.Be3 which is an error. What follows should be understood in the context of Steinitz who wrote that the player with the advantage MUST attack (punish the mistakes of) his opponent. The move is flawed because it defends d4 at the cost of leaving b2 defenseless. Thus, the reply Qb6 is indicated; it adds an attacker to d4 and hits b2. Remember Capa; the basic advantage in chess is the unit that holds two!

White found his best reply with Nc3 where Black can already force White to take a draw after Qxb2. This fact reinforces the conclusion that White's 4th was a mistake else why could Black gain a forced draw so easily? In a way, this is unfortunate since it means no strong White Player will allow this position since they will not want to risk Black forcing this draw after Qxb2.

Now, since White has committed an error and we are trying to punish him, Qxb2 doesn't seem the way to do it. Also, if the opponent ignores your threat it is usually correct to carry out that threat for at least one move. Thus, 5...cxd4 for Black.

Now after 6.Nd5, if you run away with the queen then White simply plays Bxd4 and has an edge. This means that retreating the queen is illogical; White has a disadvantage and must be punished. Once you realize that, 6...dxe3 is easy to find.

For the queen, Black has an ultra safe king, two minor pieces and a pawn plus almost total dark square control (exacerbated by White's failure to even attempt to retain his knight, the only non female piece able to influence the dark squares).

White has a displaced king, development deficit and a horrible white bishop with no active prospects. He is faced with the immediate loss of two more pawns with Bxb2 and so his Queen is confined to defensive duties. One other critical factor to be considered is that White does not have a single effective pawn lever at his disposal. He does not even have the prospect of an active exchange sacrifice to alter the position (only perhaps passive sacs with Rd5 at some future point).

Contrast this with the Black position where since the White b pawn can't move, this pseudo isolates the c pawn and for that, Black has TWO pawns to use as levers against that point. Also, consider the lovely squares Black gets for his minors....e5 e6 c5 c6 or even d4 beckon piece placement.

My post game analysis (as the line I played was logically inspired over the board and not prepared) which I conducted "postal style" over about 20 hours confirmed my judgement during the game.

As always, comments and/or questions are welcome.

Sep-25-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Stonehenge: <JG27Pyth: There's an amusing position that could arise in continuation from the final position. Suppose white wants to struggle on and plays Qg8? -- threatening Qxh7+ ... Black responds Nf8! And now the Queen has _no_ moves. A maximum security prison from which there is no hope of escape.>

Nonsense, after 49.Qg8 Nf8 50.h4 Rxg3 51.Kh1 Rh3+ 52.Kg2 Rxh4 53.Kf3 Rh3+ 54.Kg4 Re3 55.Kg5 Rxe4 56.Qg7+ Bxg7 it's stalemate.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Queen sac under 10 moves...(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 6 Compiled by xajik by kishchess
English Opening: Great Snake Variation (A10) 0-1 Opening Q Sac
from Ware Art Thou, O' Fredthebear? Strange Days Here by fredthebear
09 QUEEN SACRIFICE
by openingbook
chessrookie86's favorite games 1
by chessrookie86
Game 35
from How to Reassess your Chess (Silman) by isfsam
English Opening: Great Snake Variation (A10) 0-1 Opening Q Sac
from 1990s Blatant Lies, Scandals & Coverups of 1990s by fredthebear
Game 35
from How to Reassess Your Chess 4th ed by Silman by skybluesky
Great Snake
from tommy boy's favorite games by tommy boy
Queen sac under 10 moves...(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 6 by Trigonometrist
Game of the day 3
by vikinx
kayleff's favorite games
by kayleff
Game 35
from How to Reassess your Chess (Silman) by Qindarka
Game 35
from How to Reassess your Chess (Silman) by Patca63
September 12: Mayo Clinic
from Game of the Day 2008 by Phony Benoni
a dragon-snake. queen sac in SIX6 moves
from opening instruction by kevin86
Queen sac under 10 moves...(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 6 by xajik


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC