< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
|Sep-01-14|| ||al wazir: Did Donner intend that advice for the master playing against multiple opponents or for the opponents?|
|Sep-01-14|| ||offramp: The advice was addressed to the amateur.|
|Sep-01-14|| ||An Englishman: Good Evening: Donner's right for both simultaneous play and in tournament play against an opponent so much higher rated than you that you don't have any realistic chances. So why not go for broke? At worst, your GM opponent will be sufficiently inspired to win one of his 60 Memorable Games (Fischer vs O Celle, 1964). And if you don't go for broke, you'll never know if you could have shocked the world and the world champion so much that they name the variation you played in your honor (Steinitz vs McCutcheon, 1885).|
|Sep-01-14|| ||morfishine: Holze in White's position leads to a mammoth attack
|Sep-01-14|| ||Once: The contrasting fates of bishops on adjacent diagonals. Black's bishop pair decide the game - white's do nothing.|
I suppose the bottom line is that your bishops need to be aimed at something?
|Sep-01-14|| ||FSR: Two puns in a row for me. Game Collection: Puns I submitted|
|Sep-01-14|| ||Penguincw: I'm pretty sure white was already lost, but 19.Bd3 Bxd3+ 20.Rxd3 Nxd3 does allow white to last a little longer, even though he's down a rook for pawn.|
|Sep-01-14|| ||offramp: As it's the first of the month <"White Rabbits"> might have been part of the neuro-nexual semiotics synapsing through <FSR>'s colossal mental cyberbase.|
|Sep-01-14|| ||offramp: How do we request more GOTD puns from <POSOO>? |
He or she did a brilliant Flohr/Floor one a few days ago.
|Sep-01-14|| ||FSR: A few Houdini 3-aided notes: <1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d5 3. exd5 e4> For 3...Bd6 4.d4 e4 5.Ne5, see the astonishing upset T Sakelsek vs P Corbin, 2004. <4. Qe2! Nf6> For 4...f5, see the amazing Tal vs Lutikov, 1964. <5. Nc3 Be7 6. Nxe4 O-O
7. d3?!> Better is 7. Nxf6+ Bxf6 8. d4 Qxd5 9. Be3 Nc6 10. c3 Bg4 11. h3 Bh5 12. Qd1 +0.52. <7... Re8 8. Bd2 Nxd5 9. O-O-O Be6?!> Better is 9... f5!, virtually winning a piece by force. <10. Kb1 Nc6 11. Nc3 Bf6?> 11... Nxc3+! 12. Bxc3 Bg5! 13. Nxg5 Bxa2+ 14. Kxa2 Rxe2 15. Bxe2 Qxg5 16. Bf3 Qc5 -1.08 <12. Nxd5?> White is still better after 12. Ne4. <12... Qxd5> -0.68 <13. c4 Qd6 14. Be3> 14. Bg5 Bg4 15. Qd2 Nd4 is large advantage Black. <14... b5! 15. Qc2?!> Weak, but White is already in big trouble, e.g. 15. cxb5 Bxa2+! 16. Kxa2 (16. Kc1 Nd4) (16. Ka1 Qa3 17. d4 Qa4 ) 16...Qd5+ 17. Kb1 Nb4 18. Kc1 Qa2 19. d4 c5 20. bxc6 Rab8 . Better is 15. Bg5 Bf5 16. Qd2 bxc4 17. Bxf6 Qxf6 large advantage Black. <15... Nb4 16. Qc1 bxc4 17. dxc4 Qa6 18. a3 Bf5+ 19. Ka1 Qxa3#> 0-1|
|Sep-01-14|| ||FSR: <offramp> A couple of months ago I got a biography of Philip Corbin of Barbados, a devotee of the Elephant Gambit, which inspired me to nominate some Elephants for GOTD, including Corbin's T Sakelsek vs P Corbin, 2004 ("Elephantiasis"). Seriously, don't miss that one. It inspired me one night to attempt to play Elephant Gambits in all my online blitz games. I never did succeed, since all my White opponents played either 1.d4 or the Bishop's Opening. I first saw this game, another that makes the Elephant look good, in MCO-11 circa 1973. Being about 1400 at the time, I couldn't figure out where White went wrong.|
I happened to think of the phrase "white elephant" a few days ago, and immediately thought of this game, an Elephant where White gets the "white elephant" of extra material, but gets crushed.
|Sep-01-14|| ||morfishine: <FSR> Isn't there a separate Elephant Opening where White moves all his pawns 1-square to the third rank? Or is that a "trunkated" version of the elephant Gambit proper? |
<Offramp> Your sarcasm kills me
|Sep-01-14|| ||FSR: <morfishine> You're confusing your critters. If one moves all one's pawns to the third rank, that's a Hippopotamus, not an Elephant. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippo... http://www.chess.com/forum/view/che...|
|Sep-01-14|| ||ljfyffe: The neat thing about the Internet is that you can shoot an Elephant in your pajamas. Sorry .....
Groucho. Or, I could say:"There will always be an Englund! " This time, sorry .... to everyone.|
|Sep-01-14|| ||perfidious: <ljfyffe> No need--your pun is more amusing than some which pass for humour here.|
|Sep-01-14|| ||morfishine: <FSR> Yes, of course, I was thinking of the Hippopotamus Opening. Thanks for the refresher, I looked and looked and looked...|
Now, to go work on the Wildebeest Opening :)
|Sep-02-14|| ||ljfyffe: <morfishine> "leads to a mammoth attack" -must be an OLD line in the Elephant Gambit. Now, for that I deserve a Boo-Booooo; where is Yogi Berra, when you need him?|
|Sep-02-14|| ||tamar: Part of the Ebony and Ivory Collection.|
|Sep-02-14|| ||ljfyffe: Lawrence Day, in The Canadian Encyclopedia, says N.M. MacLeod " specialized in what later became known as the Hippopotamus Defence".|
|Sep-02-14|| ||morfishine: <ljfyffe> That was the joke: Holze/holes & Elephant/mammoth|
Glad someone else thought is was amusing; If one doesn't like it, guess the reply would be "Tsk Tsk"...
|Sep-02-14|| ||whiteshark: Is this Guenter Holze ?|
|Sep-02-14|| ||ljfyffe: <morfishine>I'd gotten it. Elizabeth Bishop, the Nova Scotian/American poet liked the mis-spelt "manmoth". Reminds me ...when a fellow, having made one, said to me:"no pun intended", I replied: "None taken!"|
|Sep-02-14|| ||kevin86: A great win with the Queen Pawn Counter- Gambit by black!|
|Sep-02-14|| ||ljfyffe: I read Linda McQuaid's "Shooting the Hippo". If you're seeking chess info, don't bother! Otherwise, not a bad book.|
|Aug-20-18|| ||Invisible1: Not right now,Thank You !!!|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·