chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Chessgames premium membership fee will increase to $39 per year effective June 15, 2023. Enroll Now!

Rybka (Computer) vs Hikaru Nakamura
"The Bully Pulpit" (game of the day Apr-01-2011)
ICC blitz 3 0 (2008) (blitz), Internet Chess Club, Mar-15
Grob Opening: General (A00)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

find similar games 2 more Rybka/Nakamura games
sac: 60...Qc8 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 14 OF 14 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-03-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <kingscrusher> I agree. I came to a similar conclusion after the following game Aylerkupp / Rybka vs Kutztown46 / Stockfish, 2011, when Rybka 4.1 played 94.b4 in order to, I believe, avoid a draw by the 50-move rule. Rybka's eval of the position after Stockfish's 90...Rc8 was [+0.65] and after 94.b4 it was [+0.16], still better than the [0.00] that it would have evaluated the draw.

There is an analysis of this game by GM Gserper in http://www.chess.com/article/view/c... that I just came across. He makes the same point about Rybka apparently going out of its way to avoid a draw by the 50-move rule.

So apparently this bug is still in the latest version of Rybka. I wonder if Stockfish (or Stockfish's developers) knew about it. :-) Vasich Rajlich, take note!

Mar-04-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  paulalbert: <kingcrusher> and <AylerKupp> Thanks for the clarification! Since I don't play against these machines, I thought you meant the bug was failure by the machine to count the 50 moves and claim a draw rather than making an inferior move to avoid it. I suppose at 174 c4 the machine possibly still gave itself a positive evaluation because of the material plus, so avoiding the 50 move rule by an inferior move might be a rational programming approach in order to still try for a win, but the evaluation routine must fail to see the long term consequences of turning a totally closed position into an open one.
Mar-31-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Classic stuff.
Mar-31-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: It's nice to see an engine look like a total idiot.
Apr-08-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: I have video annotated this game here :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2k4V...

Aug-09-13  GumboGambit: According to Rybka, Nakamura is a tool.
Sep-07-13  Snehalshekatkar: Fake.. no comp would start from g4 and h3
Oct-23-13  SicilianStar: This is fake. It is clearly a draw for a very long time but a draw is never excepted. In the near the end Rybka starts making blunders one after another and somehow manages to lose. On move 194 white moves his rook to a square where a pawn can take it but black does not take. This would never have happened in a real game.
Oct-23-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <SicilianStar> Remember, this was a blitz game. And I'm sure that Rybka was <very> short of time. And you obviously have never seen Rybka play when it doesn't have time to search more than one ply. Yes, it does do things like that. I've seen its play disintegrate when playing against Houdini when very short of time (and Rybka does tend to get into big time trouble on long games).

And Rybka apparently will <NOT> accept a draw if it evaluates its position as superior. If you don't believe me, take a look at this game: Aylerkupp / Rybka vs Kutztown46 / Stockfish, 2011 and the commentary that follows it. This game is not a fake; I was (obviously) there and saw it happen in real time.

Oct-23-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <kingscrusher> I just saw your video of this game and heard your reference to Rybka's 50-move rule bug. As you can see if you look at my link above and Rybka's 91.b4 it is clear that the bug has not been removed since the version used in this game was the latest and current version of Rybka, 4.1. Maybe Vas Rajlich doesn't know about it ?!

I wonder if there are any special "anti-Rybka" versions of other engines programmed to take advantage of this. :-)

Oct-03-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <Ohio> -- < It's nice to see an engine look like a total idiot.>

They're *all* idiots. It's just that some of them play chess better than the rest of us idiots.

With exceptions, obviously.

Nov-27-14  welhelm1982: The pieses finished their school during this game and they get marrage and had achidren and and and
Feb-13-15  manata27: Well i'am more impressed by Nakamuras coordination then by his (of course extremely tough) skills. I would just not be able to play 255 moves in three minutes.
Apr-08-15  rahulgaikwad: lol, Hold your keyboards left key pressed for certain amount of time and then see the fun as how black rooks dances up and down and then bishops make a dance sideways and in the end the climax. I thought there was an error in the program. But to my amazement, so many bishops was a true story.
Apr-12-15  Chichiboy: Perhaps Nakamura should enter the book of records for having had the most bishops on the board. Perhaps it's the game with the most bishops by an opponent(6).
Jul-25-15  Ke2: this is like the crowning achievement of online chess
Oct-13-15  FRED MALAWA: AMAZING GAME
Oct-19-15  Eusebius: Rybka was programmed to avoid the draw...ridiculous. Games like this will mark the end of the chess game.
Aug-14-16  esteger: Much was contributed to the theory of the king and six bishops versus lone king endgame.
May-05-17  Dave12: On move 251 Nakamura missed a fine mate on the middle of the board with Bg5!!
Jul-18-17  Chuckles: I don't really understand calling this a bug in Rybka. Draws are evaluated at 0.00, so if it evaluates avoiding the draw at any positive score, it will avoid the draw. What else should it do? I guess you could program it to always allow 50-move draws, on the basis that if there's been no progress in those 50 moves, then the position is probably a fortress like this.

The basic issue is that computers often can't evaluate fortresses properly, but that's nothing to do with the 50-move rule specifically.

Aug-17-19  lukasko123: don´t play g4 first move, u´ll be busted by bishops
Mar-05-22  Chesgambit: 181.Rg3 last change for draw
Mar-05-22  Chesgambit: 250.Bg5# was mate but Hikaru just want for a beautiful mate
Mar-05-22  Chesgambit: 180...Bd6? (180...Kg4!)
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 14)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 14 OF 14 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: BLITZ. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
About 300 moves too long...
from Catfriend's extreme lengths by Catfriend
six bishops-no waiting...
from unique themes three by kevin86
"Bishop rules!"
from The great hall of immortal games by tentsewang
2008
from Computer - GM games 2003-2008 by biglo
Funny checkmate by 5 bishops
from meir's favorite games by meir
Man still trumps Machine
from Favorite games by shintaro go
biohaz's favorite games
by biohaz
Really Bizarre Games
by Cannon Fodder
BestGamesBestPlayers
by Miguel Medina
HFlew's favorite games
by HFlew
ICC blitz 3 0 2008 (The Anti Computer Game!)
from Favorite Games from (2008) by wanabe2000
Clerical stuff
from That's strange by Phony Benoni
Rybka doesn't like to resign
from Nakamura's Noteables voted by members 1/26/08+ by ffpainz
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
from LOL GAMES by DarthStapler
zatara's favorite games
by zatara
Nakamura sends another computer to Andromeda with 5B
from Cheks' favorite games by Cheks
Miscellaneous Games
by Cinco
Matt with 5 bishops--unique
from laszlosantha's favorite games by laszlosantha
hamham's important games
by hamham
Finally! A computer's shown its place :)
from Fuzzy's Personal's by Fuzzy
plus 94 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC