Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Etienne Bacrot vs Yannick Pelletier
41st Biel International Chess Festival (2008), Biel SUI, rd 5, Jul-24
Philidor Defense: General (C41)  ·  1-0



explore this opening
find similar games 9 more Bacrot/Pelletier games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-25-08  Marmot PFL: I see the Frenchmen played Philidor's Defense.
Jul-25-08  messachess: I think that the chances here positionally for a win are with Bacrot.
Jul-25-08  karnak64: Is Pelletier really out of time?
Jul-25-08  barb: I think Black's under real pressure here.
Jul-25-08  karnak64: Um, I guess so ... Congrads, Bacrot!
Premium Chessgames Member
  kamalakanta: There was no defense to the double threats of Rxa5 and Nh5.
Premium Chessgames Member Thanks to everybody for participating in today's triple header. We'll be back tomorrow at 8:00am (USA/Eastern) for round #6.
Jul-25-08  Marmot PFL: Been a while since I've seen "Bacrot wins".
Jul-25-08  Vilya: Yeah, me too...
Jul-25-08  malthrope: Thank! :^)
Jul-25-08  messachess: This was just remarkable positional play by Bacrot. Pelletier was in virtual Zugzwang at the end. This post deserves reshowing: <THE pawn: But talent-wise, Bacrot is as good as everybody, he just doesn't invest that much time into chess anymore. I think he got over the game once he realised poker was more $ and when he wouldn't stop winning the french championship. Back when he was 14, Kasparov said he would be top 5 one day because of his enormous talent (he precisely said that himself at 14 wasn't as good as young Bacrot) but he left his chess studies.>
Jul-25-08  Ulhumbrus: In the position after 25...c3 White's Rooks are three moves ahead of their Black counterparts in development.

The move 28 Rxb7! follows a rule useful to know about, where it does apply: when your opponent attacks a piece, offer him another as well. He can take only one at a time. What might be called a classic example of this occurred in the game Anand vs Kasparov, 1995 where by 21 Ka3 Anand attacked one of Kasparov's rooks. Kasparov offered Anand his other Rook as well by 21...Rxc2! whereupon Anand resigned.

One explanation for offering a second Rook when the opponent attacks the first is that it overworks the attacking Rook, which has then a second task laid on its shoulders, that of having to defend its colleague. Its collesgue is overworked in the same way, having to defend the first Rook.

Jul-25-08  acirce: Indeed nobody can deny that Bacrot is incredibly talented. I have not heard about that Kasparov statement before, but I don't think that would have been an unrealistic prediction at the time. Perhaps now it is too late but...perhaps not.
Jul-25-08  vanytchouck: messachess>

Are you sure of your quote?

The only Kasparov's quote about Bacrot i know is one where he's said that Bacrot will be the best french at 17.

The only comparison between Bacrot and Kasparov i know was made by Dorfman.

I don't claim to know everything about Bacrot, but i've got lots of french magazines about the young Bacrot and i don't remember reading something even close.

Jul-25-08  messachess: <Are you sure of your quote?> I got it from <THE pawn>, this tournament: L Dominguez vs Bacrot
Jul-25-08  messachess: Who else was good at age 14? Bobby Fischer said, "When I was 14, I just got good." Indeed, he won the US Championship at 14.
Jul-25-08  ex0duz: The usual suspects i believe.. Radjabov, Bu Xiangzhi, Judit Polgar, Leko, Carlsen, Karjakin, Wesley So etc.
Jul-25-08  ajile: This is why the Philidor is not played at the top levels much anymore. White maintains a nice advantage from beginning to end.

Black's opening weakness? White getting a Knight to f5. Also Black in the main line of the Hanham Variation tries for b5. c6-a6 and even b6 to prepare b5 if White plays a4. Problem is Black wants to play b5 and Bb7 which leaves a weakness on f5.

Jul-25-08  Granny O Doul: <messachess> It was at age 11 that Fischer "just got good".
Premium Chessgames Member
  sisyphus: Who was good at 14? Capablanca and Reshevsky come to mind. For that matter, Botvinnik placed fifth in the Soviet championship at 13. Mecking and Short also deserve mention.
Jul-25-08  percyblakeney: <Who else was good at age 14?>

Polgar was enormously strong at 14, according to Chessmetrics she's the best player ever at that age. Karjakin almost won against Kramnik at 14 and Radjabov won with black against both Kasparov and Anand when slightly older, so they ought to be among the strongest players around that age lately.

Jul-25-08  GHOST19: Ponomariov was also extremely strong very young.
Jul-25-08  messachess: <Granny O Doul> I thought I remembered reading him saying "14." I forget the source--maybe the 'Hayes' (is the author?) volume of all his known games.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mateo: A good game from Bacrot. 26...Rab8!? was an interesting pawn sacrifice (as after 27.bxc4 Nxc4? 28.Rdd7, White wins), but then Pelletier lost his way (27...Rfd8?!). Better 27...Rfe8! 28.Rxe8 Rxe8 with counterplay.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mateo: Bacrot analyses his game :
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collection[what is this?]
by chess.master

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC