Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Arno Nickel vs The World
"World Peace" (game of the day Feb-25-2009)
Chessgames Challenge (2008) (exhibition),, rd 2, Aug-25
Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer. Neo-Modern Variation (B67)  ·  1/2-1/2



explore this opening
find similar games 1 more A Nickel/The World game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 931 OF 931 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-25-09  WhiteRook48: I KNEW this was going to be game of the day!
Feb-25-09  pagliacci19: thanks everyone, learned a lots.
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I meant the draw offer <ganstaman>
Feb-26-09  lost in space: <<WhiteRook48>: I KNEW this was going to be game of the day!>

...and that the game was called WORLD PEACE.


Feb-26-09  kkshethin: Thank you all the participents (even if sometimes i do not agree with them). Thanks to the analysts from them i learned much. However i have to say few words regarding Draw.
There was a time in the game when everybody was worried about possible outcome. Nobody can deny that we have to sweat in order to save the game. Now after tide turned it is surprising that some of the people totally forget those worrying moments and started voicing to continue for win eventhough nobody gave any plausible line of winning
Feb-26-09  WhiteRook48: a win and a draw against Nickel is amazing.
Feb-26-09  ganstaman: <OhioChessFan: I meant the draw offer <ganstaman>>

Now I'm even more confused. Are you saying that what you were saying is: "I'm still waiting for confirmation that it is customary in CC games to offer a draw based on [a draw offer that] will happen 3 plies later."

I still don't see how my response isn't appropriate.

Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Message on my forum on the matter <gansta>
Feb-26-09  patzer2: GM Arno Nickel, thanks for such an instructive, interesting and well played game. Perhaps you could have found winning chances in the complex Rook sac line given above by kb2ct. I look forward to your analysis.
Feb-26-09  Nite4k: Congratulations to both <GM Arno Nickel> and <The World Team> for a hard fought and well played game!

GMAN considered the position "very complicated" after our <10...h5!?> but said he needed more time to be able to find the best lines and consequently played cautiously not to lose after he gained the advantage that made him confident he was going to win.

So understandably he must feel some disappointment that he did not press his advantage and was forced to offer the draw.

On the other hand, after 10...h5, the World team had to find the most accurate defensive moves to secure the draw.

I am happy with securing a win and a draw in our 2 encounters against such a formidable CC grandmaster as Arno.

Again, congratulations to both sides!

Now onward! Let's see if we can secure any opening advantage out of the Slav against Mikhail Umansky...

Feb-27-09  chesscard: First of all, congratulations on the draw!

Here is my analysis of your game (I followed parts of it, enjoying and also learning on the way)

1) it is a very good result considering the position in the early middle game .

2)Black played the opening and early middlegame very weakly, and should have lost this game. (Black crossed the safety of drawing line due to 3-4 mistakes).

3)White did not make any important mistakes, but his 16 h3?! was a slightly weak move, (black should have played 16...h4, immediately equalizing) But he also did not take the responsability of complicating the game when he had a large advantage.

4) Mistakes: 15...Nd7, and especially 16...Bb7? were weak moves. There were a couple of second best moves in the following moves until move 24 also.. At the end, all white needed was a single second best move from black and it would be all over. This did not happen due to excellent defense in the later stages of the game.

5)White did not act on time, and waited for black to make another mistake to win (this was white's biggest mistake, he was not decisive enough even though he had a winning advantage)

6)Starting from 24...Re8, I believe that black's play was at a very high level. it was a very difficult position to save, and the team analyzed this difficult position very well.

7) Both sides analyzed (mainly) with Rybka, world team was able to find some important moves that were not Rybka's first choice to draw the game. GMAN mostly copied Rybka, and did not add much from himself.

8) GMAN was happy with a draw, and did not take action when he had a significant advantage, allowing you to equalize.

9) Both sides thought Rybka was "god", and did not give enough attention to other engines (which depending on the type of position are stronger than Rybka). World team did not know in what position Rybka was not the best engine. GMAN did not have the time to analyze with other engines (because of his other important games).

10) Overall, this is a very good result (considering the position after 18...Qxg5).

11)Ending was not a dead draw, it should have been played a little longer.

12)In my opinion, this was the weakest game by the World team in 3 games I witnessed. At least, you now know that it may be very difficut to draw with black.

13) Umansky game: You will be facing one of the most creative cc player alive. His computer skills, and strength will not match yours, but his positional understanding and intuition will be at a much higher level. In my opinion advantage is with the world team due to stronger computer skills.

Good luck!

Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <chesscard> Thanks for your input in this game it was most helpful to the team.
Feb-27-09  WhiteRook48: I wish we had a better pun, like "A good five cent Nickel"
Feb-28-09  Dionyseus: This game was so boring I didn't even know it had finished!! I hope this game will be a big lesson to those of you who think solid is better than risky in the opening.
Mar-01-09  Dionyseus: What I meant to say is that we played too defensively, I think we needed to be more aggressive.
Mar-01-09  Arno Nickel: Anyone interested in my comments, may please look at my site on Arno Nickel
Mar-05-09  Nite4k: I went to GMAN's homepage and was very disappointed to learn that he has refused to engage in any further postgame analysis until someone on the World Team provides analytical proof that he missed a winning line or lines.

Here is what he posted:

<Well now, I prefer to discuss about good and bad moves first, anyway which engine may play these moves or not. And I prefer to discuss plans, not only single moves. Here I am really amazed about endless repeated statements in the chat, saying that I, GMAN, had spoiled my advantage and missed a win – endless repeated! – BUT never I found any ANALYTICAL PROOF for such statements. Some guys think, they even know the reason, why I failed – of course because I followed Rybka and didn’t understand the position! LOL. As far as I could see by the chat, that’s all pure speculation and some kind of self-fullfilling prophecy. (‘We felt, Nickel should win, but as he did not, he must have committed mistakes.’) Sorry, but’s a shame to read such rubbish things even from players, who are strong enough to know the difference between an “analysis” and an unproven statement. I will wait for your concrete analysis, before I am going to provide more of my views, especially regarding Rybka and other engines. Regards, Arno >

I do not recall any such winning line analyzed during the course of the game (although all our engines evaluated his position as superior until the last moves when it became [+0.00]) and that has been confirmed by checking back on the previous postings on this forum.

Were there any such analytical proof posted on the Sticky forums or our analysis tree?

To <RV>: What is the threshold for engine evaluation [+.1.00?, 1.50?, higher?] that would constitute a "winning advantage"?

Mar-06-09  chesscard: 1) Analytical proof is neither necessary or possible : One needs 50-60 ply depth to show analytically that white was winning.

2)With "Intution" and "chess understanding" is enough to see that black should have lost this game: (margin of error has been exceeded). black made at least 4-5 second best (or worse) moves. (In my opinion black can afford only 1 second best move to draw (white can afford 3 and can still draw))

3)The position should have been won for white. White had to seek immediate cirisis when there was an advantage. Instead, GMAN played like Karpov: "little moves", keeping the advantage and waiting. This lead to gradual disappeance of the advantage. How he played was: Sound: for a draw at hand with good chances of a win. But not aggressive or risky enough. (he probably saw draw as a success considering your previous matches, and did not want to risk losing the game, which is also understandable.)

4) My style is different: I believe that one needs to act like a Boa constrictor when he has the advantage! As soon as a positional advantage is achieved, material is no longer important, and very aggressive play is required. You can see this in my games. (This way i scored 10.5/11 with white in my last 2 iccf tournaments with a performance rating close to 3200!). Not letting an advantage disappear is very important in cc. (I would expect to score 90% against GM level after Qxg5).

5) GMAN is a strong cc GM, but if he wants to improve, he also needs to analyze what he did wrong ,letting the advantage disappear. (I am also very critical of myself, even in games I have won, I try to find if i did something wrong)Overall he played very well, and he was never in danger of losing. But in order to win heavily, you need to be on the edge of the cliff, where only single one can stand! In a way, you have to be ready to die in order to kill! That was missing...

very good game overall. very bad play in the opening and early middle game by black deserving of the game. (i don't think there are more than 10 people in the world who could save that position). Sound play by white, never letting the advantage disappear with a draw at hand always.

Overall a great exhibition game!

Mar-11-09  WhiteRook48: if 42...Qxe5 was voted on, why is it not in the PGN?
Mar-12-09  WhiteRook48: why not 41...Rxe1+ 42 Qxe1 exd5? :-) I like risks
Mar-15-09  WhiteRook48: sure we can come up with a better pun than this
Mar-18-09  Arno Nickel: New comments from me and others also to be found here: Arno Nickel
Oct-13-10  LIFE Master AJ: Tough game ... congrats to the World. (You bent - but never really broke.)
Oct-22-10  LIFE Master AJ: I never saw a clear win for White.

I ran through this game 4-5 times with several different engines.

Nov-02-12  RookFile: This is really an amazing defensive effort.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 931)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 931 OF 931 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: EXHIBITION. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Sicilian Def. Richter-Rauzer. Neo-Modern (B67) 1/2-1/2 unbroken
from Kwik Kollections Fredthebear Likes 15 by fredthebear
First draw against the World Team ;-)
from I was there! by zanshin
The World
by akatombo
imag's favorite games5
by imag
Lutwidge's favorite games
by Lutwidge
I was on the World Team!!
from WhiteRook48's favorite games by WhiteRook48
February 25: World Peace
from Game of the Day 2009 by Phony Benoni
jetli's favorite games played by the world
by jetli
from 88 \\ ... h5! wins - middlegame strategy by whiteshark
Sicilian Def. Richter-Rauzer. Neo-Modern (B67) 1/2-1/2 unbroken
from N O P Players Bac SP by fredthebear
Sicilian Def. Richter-Rauzer. Neo-Modern (B67) 1/2-1/2 unbroken
from Kolty's Single, Double, & TRIPLE KP Attack by A1Rajjpuut
0ZeR0's Favorite Games Volume 83
by 0ZeR0

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC