chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
John Cochrane vs Saumchurn Guttack
Casual game (1856), Calcutta IND
Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 197 more Cochrane/Saumchurn games
sac: 29...Qf3+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-05-10  karnak64: Hmm, this Somacarana chap goes by one name. Chess player, or Brazilian soccer star?

(Okay, I read his page, he lived in Calcutta and no one seems to know much about him).

Apr-05-10  johnlspouge: Monday (Very Easy)

Cochrane vs Somacarana, 1856 (29...?)

Black to play and win.

Material: B for N. The White Kh3 has 1 legal move, h4. The White Rf2 has the absolute burden of preventing Ra2xh2#, suggesting that Black should overload Rf2.

Candidates (29...): Qf3+

29…Qf3+

(1) White cannot accept the sacrifice:

30.Rxf3 Rxh2#

(2) 30.Kh4

I went for <30…Bf6+>, which (like everyone else’s move) leads to an overwhelming win for Black. As <TheBish> points out, the puzzle position is a forced mate.

Apr-05-10  YetAnotherAmateur: I believe <agb2002> pointed towards another win. The approach I took that appears to work: 29. ... Qf3+
30. Kh4 (if Rxf3, Rxh2#) g5+

A) 31. Kh5 Qh3+
32. Kxg5 h6+
33. Kg6 Be8+
34. Rf7 Bxf7#

B) 31. Kxg5 Bf6+
32. Kh6 Qh3#

C) 31. Bxg5 Qxf2+

C1)
32. Kh3 Qxh2#

C2)
32. Kh5 Be8+
33. Qg6 Bxg6+ (this move can be skipped, it just delays things a bit) 34. Kh6 Bg7#

C3)
32. Qg3 Bxg3+
33. Kh5 (if hxg3, Qh2#) Qxh2+
34. Bh4 Qxh4#

Which is a long way of saying "forced mate in 5".

Apr-05-10  remolino: 29...Qf3+
Apr-05-10  desiobu: For some reason I thought it was white to play, and was trying to defend against the coming ...Qf3+. The simple Nxe5 probably does it. Shows the power of a tempo.
Apr-05-10  sethoflagos: <goodevans: <snip>, <26 Kg2> looks like a horrible blunder to me. What's wrong with the simple <26 Rf1>?>

Not sure. 27. Rf1 is safe enough - after 27. ... Rxf1 28. Qxf1 it looks drawish. I think white was expecting

27. Kg2 Qb5
28. Nxe5 Qxd3
29. Nxd3 which leaves white comfortably ahead.

Even better for white is

27. Kg2 Ra2+
28. Bd2 Bb5
29. Nxb6 Bxd3
30. Rxd3

28. Rf2 was the real blunder

Apr-05-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  gawain: Nifty position! Qf3+ wins by deflecting the rook and allowing Rxh2#.

It's nice how the g4 pawn blocks the King's escape and how the same Bishop that is supporting the rook at h2 also covers the g3 square. The setup pleases me a lot.

Apr-05-10  kevin86: Black offers his queen-if accepted,the result is immediate mate;if declined,the game tumbles like dice.
Apr-05-10  thegoodanarchist: <karnak64: Hmm, this Somacarana chap goes by one name. Chess player, or Brazilian soccer star?>

or both??? :)

Apr-05-10  thegoodanarchist: <jussu: Oh dear, 29... Qf3+ 30. Kh4 g5+ 31. Bxg5 Qxf2+ of course. I really am getting too old for chess.>

How about 30. Kh4 Bf6+ 31. g5 e5 32. Qf5 (only move) Bxf5#

Apr-05-10  goodevans: <sethoflagos: ... 27. Rf1 is safe enough - after 27. ... Rxf1 28. Qxf1 it looks drawish.>

But 27 Rf1 Rxf1+ 28 Kxf1 still leaves white with three pieces en prise. Surely this must be winning?

<Even better for white is

27. Kg2 Ra2+
28. Bd2 Bb5
29. Nxb6 Bxd3
30. Rxd3>

So by my reckoning white missed two winning opportunties.

Apr-05-10  StevieB: If I got it, it must be very easy. (pats back)
Apr-05-10  Bozantium: 30. Kh4 g5+ and wins.
Apr-05-10  VincentL: In this "very easy" position, the trick is 29.... Qf3+

If 30. Rxf3 Rxh2 mate

If 30. Kh4 g5+. Here black has various posible responses.

31. Bxg5 Then 31....Qxf2+ On 32.Kh3 Qh2 mate On 32. Kh5 Be8+ 33. Kh6 Bg7 mate On 32. Qg3 Bxg3+ and mate follows

31. Kxg5 Bf6+ 32. Kh5/Kh6 Qh3 mate

31. Kh5 Be8+ On 32. Kxg5 Bf6+ 33. Kh6 Qh3 mate On 32. Kh6 Bg7+ 33. Kxg5 Bf6+ 34. Kh6 Qh3 mate

Apr-05-10  DarthStapler: I picked Rxf2 after Kh4, that's still good enough to win I think
Apr-05-10  Shah Mat: <goodevans: What's wrong with the simple <26 Rf1>? Now black has all four (!!) of his pieces en prise and I can't see how he would avoid losing material>

after 27...Rxf1 28. Kxf1 Qb5 and the game is equal. so you're absolutely right: Kh4 was a blunder.

Apr-05-10  sethoflagos: <goodevans:
But 27 Rf1 Rxf1+ 28 Kxf1 still leaves white with three pieces en prise. Surely this must be winning?>
27. Rf1 Rxf1+
28. Kxf1 Qa6! (not 28. .. Qb5 29. Nxe5 Qxd3 30. Nxd3)

If 29. Nxe5 Bb5 wins Q

29. Qxd7 Qxc4+

gets quite tense, but I think either side can settle for perpetual check/draw by repetition.

Apr-05-10  The Rocket: Took me aproximately 7 seconds to spot:) very nice way to finish a game
Apr-05-10  TheaN: Monday 5 April 2010

<29....?>

Target: 0:40;000
Taken: 0:10;994

Material: Black up minor piece exchange: 2♗ / ♗+♘

Candidates: <[Qf3†]>

-ML-
Without initially seeing the followup, the only reasonable Queen sac is:

<29....Qf3†> this move is NOT completely forced, meaning there are two variations. Capturing ends immediately.

/A\
<30.Rxf3 Rxh2‡ 0-1> opening up the second rank is not advisable.

/B\
<30.Kh4> and although there might be a completely forced mate here, White be willing to capitulate after:

<30....Rxf3† > losing at least the Rook with a hard to par mate threat on h2.

Apr-05-10  Cushion: Qf3+ wins nicely.
Apr-05-10  wals: Rybka 3 1-cpu: 3071mb hash: depth 14:
A few errors calculated by Rybka -
White
23.Bxc4 (-1.33) Better was Nxc4 (+0.07)
Black
24...dxc4 (-0.21) better was Qd6 (-1.60)
25...Nf3+ (+1.40) Better was Bxh2 (-0.23)
27...Ra2 (+2.54) Better was Qb5 (+1.39)
White
28.Rf2 (-0.97) better was Bd2 (+2.54)
29.Kh3 (-#6) better was Kh1 (-0.97)
Apr-05-10  SharpAttack: <Wals> 29. Kh1 is an illegal move..dunno how you got that out of Rybka!
Apr-05-10  wals: <SharpAttack> Typo sharp eyes, should read Better was 29...Kg1
Apr-05-10  sethoflagos: <Shah Mat>

Apologies. I missed a resource and you're absolutely right. 27. Rf1 Rxf1 28. Kxf1 Qb5 is correct and a stone cold draw.

Apr-06-10  sethoflagos: <goodevans:> Yes indeed, 30 c4 was the resource I overlooked.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC