and I say... Kramnik always!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yes. Click on the double-arrowhead gadget at the lower-left corner of the chessboard, right next to a1.

Unfortunately some posters here prefer to talk out of some other orifices on their body instead of their mouths.

That option is apparently not available when there is live broadcasting going on. (So now you can do it because the game is now in the database.)

Ridiculous, of course. A great player like Kramnik would never fall into a mate in four (or less).

During the world championship in Mexico, at the press conference after Kramnik vs Anand, 2007, I remember that some idiot journalist asked him if he saw the trap 29.Qxg5?? Ne2+ 30.Kh1 Qxh2+! 31.Kxh2 Rh8+ with mate next move, and Kramnik said "No, I usually miss this kind of thing".

Of course though, while in both the Anand and Moro games the opponent tried to lure Kramnik with bait which made Kramnik stop and think, in the Topalov and Fritz games there wasn't any real bait (i.e. hanging a piece or pawn), which probably resulted in Kramnik letting his guard down, although in the Topalov game he was probably already losing at that point and luckliy managed to hold on for a win.

for and example of the 10.Qxc7?Qd5 line check out the game I Krush vs Gulko, 2009. Rc8 doesn't happen immediately in this line if white follows with 11.Qd6 but it does happen. Also 10...Qxc7 11.Bxc7 Rc8 probably also gives black a slight edge as well. Maybe Moro should have avoided 9.Bf4 and tried for 9.Bg5 instead.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.