Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Judit Polgar vs Boris Gelfand
World Cup (2009), Khanty-Mansiysk RUS, rd 3, Nov-28
Bishop's Opening: Berlin Defense (C24)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 13 times; par: 44 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 37 more Judit Polgar/Gelfand games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can display posts in reverse order, by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page and checking the option "Display newest kibitzes on top."

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <zanshin: It seems I don't understand the position (what a shock ;-)) Black was already in desperation mode. After suggesting <29...Nb6> at low ply (+1.01), Rybka sees something bad for Black and suggests sacing the Knight:

(29... Ne3 30. Qxe3 f4 31. Qxe4)>

I've tried to explain that in a previous post - the idea of 29...Nb6 (which is also given by Chessok) is to bring the knight to d5, to guard the crucial square f6. However, it isn't good enough because after 30.Qh6 Nd5 White wins by <31.Rg2> (rather than 31.c4? as suggested by Chessok's Rybka), with the simple idea of doubling rooks on the g-file and playing Rg7. Tossing away that piece with 29...Ne3 and then f4 is a clever way to stop Qh6 - but not to save the game, because Black just remains a piece down in a hopeless position.

Nov-28-09  zanshin: <Eyal> Thanks for taking the time to explain it to me. I think I finally understand - or at least I understand it as best as I ever will. Thanks again.
Premium Chessgames Member
  luzhin: Gelfand's 29...Rf7?? looked like panic. If 29...Nb6 30.Qh6 Nd5 Black is doing his best to keep Polgar's Bishop out of f6, although I suspect she is still well on top. I think the key move was the amazing 19.g4!!??, which I'm sure is objectively very dodgy, but it led to the sort of random positions much more to Judit's liking than Gelfand's.
Nov-28-09  molinov: 24... gxf5 would have been an improvement. Of course that is easy to say when you can check with the computer. Thereīs nothing really clear for white after 25. Rxf5 Ng7 26. Rxf6. I wonder what frightened Gelfand over the board. Even though her play was not "sound", Polgar played a brillant game in a must win situation. No computer-based analysis can take that away from her.
Nov-28-09  VishyAnandFan: its not moves, this one or that one, that leads to gelfands loss or judit s win. its romanticism on judits side and scientific and materialistic play on gelfands side. beginning with 15.nh4 judit decides to attack, taking great risks, throwing all her pieces to the kingside. i love her way to play! she knows, burning all bridges behind, she has to win through attack, or else being some pawns down she will be lost. its this attitude thats leads to a possible win, not a single move. for example you cant say after a 8-move-combination, look the last move was the winning move, no its the hole combination. in the end position two black minor pieces are not involved in the game because gelfand decided to play on the queenside long ago. its about concepts not single moves
Nov-29-09  molinov: VishtAnandFan seems to have a rather strange notion of materialism and science. Leaving that aside, I think that tactics play a role just as important as strategy. And, in fact, there are points in which itīs not easy to separate the two. Judit had attack on the kingside, but she had given up two pawns for it. I think it is perfectly legitimate to discuss the tactics, since not only Gelfand, but Judit herself must have dedicated quite a lot of time to decide what moves to make. Of course both made strategic decisions, but those decisions are linked inextricably to tactic decisions. And itīs far from clear that Judit won because of strategy and not tactics.
Nov-29-09  MaxxLange: what a beautiful win

it reminds us of old-style Judit Polgar chess: brilliant tactical blows flowing from the position, one after another, logical ideas , beautiful, clear, and not defensible

Nov-29-09  zatara: It seems she still got it!It would be great to see her back at the top events again.
Nov-29-09  Red October: <zanshin> in the diagram in your post, its striking that Black does not have 1 but 2 minor pieces out of play...
Nov-29-09  MaxxLange: <zanshin> I wondered what kind of horrible threats forced the desperate exchange sac with 29...Rf7
Nov-29-09  MaxxLange: suppose that Black plays, say, 29...Rae8. What does white have that is so crushing? Just 30 Rg5 and doubling rooks?
Nov-29-09  MaxxLange: 29..Rae8 30 Qh6 maybe is crushing
Nov-29-09  VishyAnandFan: molinov you didnt get the point. first of all there is nothing strange to like tal's or polgar's style more than say botvinnik's style (romanticism-materialsim). i know better than you that all tactics have to be superb, if you play on that level. but look at some comments like: "gelfand lost because of 29.Rf7" they dont say polgar's chess is wonderful, they reduce an excellent piece of art to a single move. of course i pay great attention to tactics, but you have to pay tribute for the entire game or the player, not for a single move. many of tal's games were unsound, so tell me why so many loved him, even the compatriots of his opponents wanted him to win.
Nov-29-09  VishyAnandFan: i was misunderstood, i am in favor of discussing all tactics, thats clear. and of course polgar won because of tactics. if you read my comment carefully it says: "this attitude leads to a POSSIBLE win" (tactics decide but het bravery made it possible). my english skills are weak, so i cant express my point of view properly, indeed my only and main point of view is, i love her arts
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <21.Rxf7!!> would have been a romantic style piece sacrifice, a sight for sore eyes.

click for larger view

The main idea can be seen in the line <21...Qd8 22.Rxh7! Bxg5 23.Nxg6!>

click for larger view

when - aside of Rh8+ threat - the Nh5 is now en prise.

Nov-29-09  VishyAnandFan: fantastic line!! ...the first rapid between them played, gelfand succeded with ugly chess, grabbing pawn b2, grabbing pawn a2, no imagination, and winning, thats disgusting
Nov-29-09  siggemannen: Don't understand why it's disgusting to win like that? If your opponent sac unsoundly you must defend somehow. It takes a lot of imagination to defend well.
Nov-29-09  VishyAnandFan: you can love it , you are free to do so. i dont. i love chess like polgar played in third rapid
Nov-29-09  zanshin: <Red October: <zanshin> in the diagram in your post, its striking that Black does not have 1 but 2 minor pieces out of play...>

<RO> Yes, and how White's pieces are about to have a meeting with Black's King ;-)

Nov-29-09  zanshin: <MaxxLange: <zanshin> I wondered what kind of horrible threats forced the desperate exchange sac with 29...Rf7>

<MaxxLange> I think <Eyal> explains it well enough. The key threat is Bf6+. I won't try to rehash his explanation because I might get it wrong. Needless to say, Rf7 was not an outright blunder - just a move of desperation. I take back my earlier comment that Gelfand blundered this game away. Judit won it through excellent play.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: Position after 27.Qf4:

click for larger view

It's interesting that the decisive mistake, 27...f5, might seem at a first glance to be "holding" Black's position - defending both e- and f-pawns. However, it also opens the h4-d8 diagonal for White's bishop, so that Bf6 becomes a fatal threat in a few moves (and the e4 pawn doesn't really need protection in this position, because Qxe4? would be answered by Qg7+ and Bb7, where Black is suddenly the one who's attacking).

Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: As Shipov notes in his commentary (, starting from 16.f4 there are several motifs which are typical of King's Gambit games.
Mar-03-10  alexrawlings: This is quite a game! I looked this up after reading about it in Leonard Barden's chess column in tonight's London Evening Standard where he looks at the position with White to make her final move and writes:

<Polgar is by far the best female chessplayer ever and has reached the top 20 in the rankings against men, but the Hungarian is now a mother of two so competes less frequently. She returned for the $1m world knock-out and only lost to Israel's top seed Gelfand 1.5-2.5 after a hard fight. Here Polgar (White, to move at move 32) is down on material, rook against knight and three pawns, but her powerful attack up the g1-g8 file more than compensates. White's obvious try is to double rooks, but Gelfand plans to meet 32 Rg5 by 32.. Ne3 33 Rag1 Ng4; 32 Rg3 by 32.. f4; and 32 Rg2 by 32.. e3 33 Rag1 Bb7. Polgar did better, and her choice forced immediate resignation. What was White's winning move?>

The answer is 32 Rg6! White plans 33 Bf6+ or Rf6. If 32.. Qxg6 33 Qxf8+ Qg8 34 Bf6#

Could be a nice Wednesday puzzle IMO.

Premium Chessgames Member
  vonKrolock: Selected as the <Best Game from Informant 107> Milan Bjelajac: <"In her comments, Polgar demonstrates that dynamic tactical elements dominated the game. There were a few mistakes; Black was already in time-trouble at the twentieth move! However, this takes nothing away from Polgar's creative masterpiece. Judit crowned her attack with the beautiful 27.Qf4!!, a move that will surely find its place in chess anthologies.">
Oct-05-12  Jim Bartle: Judit's comments on this game:

"The 2009 World Cup proved to be a decisive moment in the birth of my book. In the third round I played Boris Gelfand, a very strong opponent who eventually went on to win the event. I lost the first match game with Black, and during my preparations for the second one, I found myself with no clue about how to break down his favourite Petroff Defence.

"I decided to improvise with the Bishop's Opening, and in the early middlegame started a sacrificial attack in the best spirit of the King's Gambit, my favourite opening as a kid. This turned out to be Gelfand's only defeat in a classical game in the whole tournament. I eventually lost the play-off, but this did not spoil the magic: it felt like for a moment the Judit from 1988, who many (including myself) had forgotten, had come back to deliver her trademark brilliancies."

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
B.O. IV Presented by FTB
by fredthebear
EruditeEgress' favorite games
by EruditeEgress
32 Rg1-g6!! f7-queen protects f8-mate sq, h7-pawn blocks h8-sq
from !! --: A square only appears multiply defended by notyetagm
Bee Bop Bop Bop goes Fredthebear
by fredthebear
Game 1061
from # Chess Informant Best Games. 1001-1100 by Qindarka
Volume 107
from # Chess Informant Golden Games by Qindarka
32 Rg1-g6!! Black f7-queen,h7-pawn meet threat to other squares
Game collection: 101
by cgrob
32 Rg1-g6!! f7-queenprotectsf8-mate sq,h7-pawnblocks h8-square
from Kieseritsky by vaskolon
Crazy game, great final tactic!
from alexrawlings' favorite games by alexrawlings
by VladimirOo
World Cup , 2009 Khanty-Mansiysk RUS Rd.3.2
from Polgar Power Originally Compiled by wanabe2000 by Patca63
POLGAR, J Bishop opeming, king's gambit
from americus' favorite games by americus
World Cup, Khanty-Mansiysk RUS, 2009 Rd.3.2
from partien's collection by partien
Judith Polgar's Immmortal game
from iking's favorite games by iking
from Chess Informant Best Game of Each Volume 65- by Sui Generis

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC