chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Andrew Burns vs Thomas Isaac Ryan
Victoria-New South Wales Telegraph Match (1873), ?
French Defense: Normal Variation (C00)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 31 more games of A Burns
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can make these tips go away by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Simply check the option "Don't show random tips on game pages." and click the Update Profile button at the bottom.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-01-15  optimal play: Inter-colonial Chess Match [by telegraph]

New South Wales vs Victoria

<<<BOARD V>

Mr. Ryan was paired against the Victorian crack. Mr. Burns, and the ingenious manner in which he won a Pawn, and kept his redoubtable enemy at bay surprised whilst it gratified his admirers.

The game, however came to an untimely end, Mr. Ryan being destined to inaugurate the run of bad luck which pursued the Sydney team throughout the match.

At his 21st move, Mr. Burns telegraphed King's Kt to Kt 3; Mr. Ryan, not observing that both Knights could be played to this square, moved his antagonist's Queen's Kt to Kt 3, and, unconscious of his error, sent a reply which lost a Bishop for nothing.

He, of course, at once resigned, as the rule on this point left him no option, but to abide by the consequences of the mistake.

Mr. Ryan played the "Fianchetto" defence, and his game was the first finished, being over at 4 in the afternoon.>

- Australian Town and Country Journal (Sydney, NSW) issue Saturday 22 November 1873 page 12-13>

Sep-01-15  Granny O Doul: Seems to me that if anything White should have been forfeited for sending the ambiguous move.
Sep-01-15  optimal play: <Granny O Doul> Good point!

By the 20th move how can anyone even tell which is the King's Knight and which is the Queen's?

Fortunately nowadays with algebraic notation we don't have that problem.

Of course, Ryan should have asked for clarification as to which Knight Burns meant, such as the specific square on which it stood, so ultimately he had to accept responsibility for his move.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collection[what is this?]
Board 5/7
from 1873 New South Wales vs Victoria by optimal play


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC