chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Magnus Carlsen vs Erwin L'Ami
Tata Steel Group A (2011), Wijk aan Zee NED, rd 5, Jan-20
Spanish Game: Morphy Defense. Anderssen Variation (C77)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Carlsen/L'Ami games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If we are missing an important game, you can submit it (in PGN format) at our PGN Upload Utility.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-20-11  bartonlaos: Another R vs R+N

Onischuk vs L Dominguez, 2008

Jan-20-11  DAVI DE RAFE: y he took the bishop with rook,if he plays check perpectualy with rook ,it would have been a stalemate
Jan-20-11  capanegra: No, it wouldn't. 70...Rd4+ 71.Bxd4 Kxg5 and White wins.
Jan-20-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sastre: <DAVI DE RAFE: y he took the bishop with rook,if he plays check perpectualy with rook ,it would have been a stalemate> There is no stalemate after 70...Rc3+ 71.Kd4 Rd3+ 72.Ke4 Rxe3+ 73.Kxe3 Kxg5. The resulting endgame is lost for Black.
Jan-20-11  capanegra: During the game, I was surprised to see 48…g5. Instead, I saw this possible continuation: 48...Ne4+ 49.Kf3 Nc3 50.Nc5+ Kf8 51.Ra8+ Ke7 52.Bg5+ Kd6 53.e7 Re1 54.e8=Q Rxe8 55.Rxe8 Kxc5.


click for larger view

Black should hold here with less suffer than in the actual continuation. Could have been possible?

Jan-20-11  Sequoia: Terrible mistake by Smeets: 93...Kh3 or Kh5 draws.
Jan-20-11  Ulhumbrus: Carlsen may have known Centurini's method of winning with a Rook and Knight against a Rook in some positions and he may have hoped to be allowed to employ it against L'Ami.
Jan-20-11  muratski: It wasn't Smeets though Magnus played against:) It was L'ami.
Jan-20-11  jmboutiere: It is amazing to admit that L'Ami has completely equalised after 22...Qd5. Magnus has imposed the plan of active moves, but obtained only equality
Jan-20-11  Ulhumbrus: Instead of 20...fxe4, 20...f4 starts a King's Indian type pawn storm on the King side.
Jan-20-11  jmboutiere: 26...b5 better than 26...Ne3
30.Ne6 starts the attack against the black king but with a good defence black should be OK
Jan-20-11  jmboutiere: Before the time control Magnus prepares vith 36.Ne6, Rc8 mate!!! Very good for the paychological effect
Jan-20-11  jmboutiere: 37...ef 38.Bd4 Kg8.39.Rc8 wins K
39...Ra2 better than 39...Re1
48...Ne4 49.Kf3 etc after 53...Re1 fokkows 54.Nd3 and white wins
Jan-20-11  jmboutiere: 50...Ne4 better than 50...a2
60...Rd7 is a blunder,better 60...Rd6
62.Bg5 better than 62.Bc1
I love this game. congrat to both payers, especially to Carlsen
Jan-20-11  molinov: No computer will deem 35... Ra3 a mistake. In spite of this, I believe that 35...Rd6 would have secured the draw for black by forcing the exchange of rooks. What do you think? Was L´Ami going for something more here?
Jan-20-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Up a pawn me Ami certainly could have drawn. I guess he pressed to hard, and drifted into a lost position.
Jan-21-11  firebyrd: <MC: Later I had planned 72.Rh8 only to discover another stalemate theme and with few seconds left on the clock played Rh2 in desperation letting him off the hook.> Position after 72. Rh8:


click for larger view

Where is the stalemate theme Magnus is talking about here?

Jan-21-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <firebyrd>
How about 72. Rh8 Re2 73. Rg8 Rxg2 74. Nf5+ Kh5 75. Rxg2, stalemate.
Jan-21-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Troller: L'Ami must have been playing for the win just before time control, it's difficult to explain 39..Re1 otherwise. Nicely played then by Magnus, but sort of a tragic ending for the Dutchman.
Jan-21-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <bartonlaos> Another R v. R+N: Judit Polgar vs Kasparov, 1996
Jan-21-11  The Chess Express: Thanks <FSR>, I love this endgame! Unfortunately I have yet to master it.
Jan-21-11  Eyal: Some interesting comments by Dennis Monokroussos on the final stage of the game:


click for larger view

<89...Rg3 [89...Rc4 would be my preference. Nowadays the "second rank defense" is all the rage in the R+B vs. R ending, but the old-fashioned Cochrane Defense (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rook_a...) is also very good, and I think the simplest way to handle the rook and knight vs. rook ending. 90.Rg1+ Kh5 91.Ne7 Rc5+ 92.Nd5 Ra5 creates your basic Cochrane setup, and as long as White's king and rook stay where they are, you maintain it, e.g. 93.Rg2 Rb5 94.Rg8 Ra5 and so on. When the king moves, it must go one way or the other, while keeping the knight protected. When that happens, our king goes the other way. 95.Ke4 Kh6 and when the knight moves, e.g. 96.Nf4 , we've cut White off for a while and can undo even more of his progress with 96...Rg5 , giving our king the freedom to push back off the back rank.]

90.Re1 Rg2 91.Ne7 Kg4 92.Nf5 Ra2 93.Rg1+


click for larger view

93...Kf3?? Headed, I guess, for some sort of second-rank like defense, but again, this is more suited to the bishop version of the ending. The problem with second-ranking it is that it works using stalemate tricks, and those stalemate tricks don't work the same when the second piece is a knight rather than a bishop. Suppose, for instance, that the piece on f5 had been a bishop. It might seem that White could win here with 94.Be4+ Ke3 95.Rg3+ followed by 96.Rg2+ and 97.Rxa2. Not so, because after 95.Rg3+ Kf2 96.Rg2+ Ke3!, 97.Rxa2 is stalemate. No such parallel exists with the knight, which is why Black should use a Cochrane-style defense. [93...Kh5 Cochrane!]> (http://www.thechessmind.net/storage...)

Jan-24-11  Albertan: With the assistance of Deep Rybka 4x64, Chessbase 11, Chessbase Megadatabase 2011, the Chessbase online database, and Nalimov endgame tablebases I have analyzed this game and posted this analysis to my blog.

A direct link to this analysis is:

http://albertan1956.blogspot.com/20... I hope you drop by and play through this analysis.Endgame tablebases showed that Carlsen blundered in the endgame, which could have permitted L'Ami to draw this game.

Feb-03-11  crazybird: <"I missed the chance of a draw and could barely get out of my chair, I was so upset. Carlsen was fit as a fiddle, as if he still could go run a marathon", Erwin L'ami>
Jul-01-11  supastarr: 72 Rh4+ looks strong, eg Kg5 73 Rd4 Re2 74 g4 Rg2 75 Ne6+ Kf6 76 Re4
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Book of Five Rings' favorite games 2
by Book of Five Rings

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC