chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Jean-Baptiste Mullon vs Herve Daurelle
Tradewise Gibraltar (2011), Catalan Bay GIB, rd 9, Feb-02
French Defense: Exchange. Monte Carlo Variation (C01)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 73 more games of J Mullon
sac: 22...Rxe3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-23-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: So who said mating with Bishop and Knight was hard?
May-23-11  estrick: <Patriot: 8.h3 makes sense but I'm not sure about 12.a3. This seems to waste time. 13.Nh4 seems to be the big loser,> <estrick: Can't believe how White, a 2400, could play so poorly.> <scormus:neither can I, completely outplayed. e.g. as if he thought "I can win easy here with 15 Bxa6" Ooops!>

Yeah, I thought 8. h3 was unnecessary. 13. a3 seems to be the same kind of move. 14. Nh4 to chase the bishop away leaves the knight on the rim not doing anything, although I guess it clears the f3 square for the queen. 15. Bxh6 looks worse than one of my failed kingside attacks, and it allows Black's knight to take the pawn on d4, putting it in a very powerful place. 16. Qxb7 is, at first blush, a most inexcusable pawn grab, but after a second look, I see that the Dame was nearly trapped and the only other available square was a retreat back to d1. This underscores the weakness of White's previous three moves and the incoherence of whatever "plan" he may have had.

Black then drives White's queen to a square where it will be totally useless in defending the king, while impudently planting another piece in the center of the board. Next, Black forks White's rooks, which might have been prevented if White had retreated queen to d1 instead of grabbing a pawn on the far side of the board. So, on move 19 White captures the offending bishop on e4, which he could have done the previous move, which would have kept his queen on the long diagonal. On move 20 White skewers the Black queen and rook with Bb5. So what? It merely 'forces' Black to triple up his heavy artillery on the e file, much like White's 16th move when he 'forced' Black to double up his rooks on the e file. And the bishop move did nothing to save his grim knight which was hanging as well.

After Black takes the rook on a1 White should resign then and there. He can't maintain the material balance by taking Black's rook on e8, which he so cleverly skewered one move earlier, because that would cause the loss of his queen to a discover attack after Black plays Bh2+, thanks to White's having 'forced' Black's queen to a better square. Capturing the knight on a1 in order to only be down the exchange instead of a whole rook draws a crucial defending piece away from where it needs to be, which allows Black to carry out the flashy sacrifice of his entire of column of heavy pieces that he had lined up on the e file.

It's reminiscent of Morphy's Opera House Massacre, or Anderssen's Immortal Game or Evergreen Party. White's play was terrible.

May-23-11  Wyatt Gwyon: Pretty complicated little game. Nice Monday puzzle.
May-23-11  Patriot: <estrick> 8.h3 has several purposes, both dealing with protecting the isolated pawn on d4. It keeps the knight from being pinned by ...Bg4 and mostly it allows Be3 without being harassed by ...Ng4. 12.a3 looks like a beginner move containing an irrational fear of a bishop pin.

There is a general principle that says whenever you have an isolated pawn, you should try to retain your minor pieces for a kingside attack. White actually did this by snapping off a kingside pawn. Obviously it didn't work but it's not so terrible of play in my opinion. Here's one way of looking at it--it was a clever way to lose. But hey that's chess sometimes!

May-23-11  sevenseaman: Here is another (a played game) example of this type of smothered mate that does not use the second rank pawns for the smothering and the K is in an artificial corner with only one recapturing piece on call.

Schaaf-Hartlaub, Bremen 1907


click for larger view

B in 4.

*I think most or all smothered mates reach execution in 4 moves?

May-23-11  estrick: Hadn't heard that g.p. about retaining minor pieces when you have an isolated pawn, but it makes sense. But White's "kingside attack" seemed pretty lame, and uncoordinated; and allowed Black to centralize his pieces on dominating squares, while scattering White's piecs to various corners.

Instead of 13. Nh4, which is where I think White really started going off the tracks, how about Qd2, which puts a little more bite into the attack on h6, maintains protection of the d pawn with both the knight and the queen, connects the rooks, and avoids having the queen chased around, which is what happened after it was misplaced on f3?

May-23-11  beenthere240: 15. Bxh6 says it all.
May-23-11  sevenseaman: Moresi - Ferrarini, Milan 1972.


click for larger view

w mates in 4.

Yet another stretch to the boa constrictor's smothering muscles!

May-23-11  M.Hassan: <patzer>,<OhioChessFan>: I have continued the line mentioned by you and looks like things would have been in White's favour!:

18.Qxa7 Nc2
19.Bb5 Qd6
20.Bxe8 Rxe8
21.Bd4 Qd7
22.Nxe4 Nxe4
23.Nf3 Qb5
24.Rxe4 Rxe4
25.Rd1 Qe2
26.Rf1 Qb5
27.a4 Qc6
The resulting diagram is below:


click for larger view

/
Have I missed anything?

May-23-11  M.Hassan: 28.Rc1
Related to the above diagram.
White is two pawns up
May-23-11  Fischer of Men: The final position reminds me of:

A Steinkuehler vs Blackburne, 1863

May-23-11  Patriot: <sevenseaman> I would start with 1.Bd5+:

A) 1...Nc6 2.Bxc6+ Rxc6 3.Qxc6#

B) 1...Nb7 2.Qb8+ Rxb8 3.Rxa7+ Bxa7 4.Nc7#

C) 1...Rc6 2.Bxc6+ Nb7 (2...Nxc6 3.Qxc6#) 3.Qb8+ Rxb8 4.Rxa7+ Bxa7 5.Nc7#

It's important to not get the move order wrong in B, for example: 1...Nb7 2.Rxa7+?? Bxa7 3.Qb8+ Bxb8

May-23-11  stst: The corner has to be preserved! & a Q sac will get it: 27.....Qg1+
28.RxQ Nf2#
as h2 is in the B's fire line, and g1 is blocked by Bk'w own R.
May-23-11  Patriot: In line C I missed a quicker line, making it at most a mate in 4 problem: 1...Rc6 2.Qxc6+ Nxc6 (2...Nb7 3.Qxb7#) 3.Bxc6#
May-23-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Loved it. 8 seconds to solve. I should have been faster though.
May-23-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  ajk68: I am trying to figure out whites 18th move. Is there a reason not to exchange the bishop for a knight, or Qxa7 ?
May-23-11  Patriot: <<ajk68>: I am trying to figure out whites 18th move. Is there a reason not to exchange the bishop for a knight, or Qxa7 ?> Houdini says Qxa7, Qa6, and Nxe4 are practically even--as in a drawish game. But I would prefer Qxa7 as a human player.

Also according to Houdini, white played very well for a long time. Nh4 wasn't so bad after all and it proves white didn't play such a lousy game--at least for a while!

May-23-11  wals: Rybka 4 x 64

19...Rxe4, -=0.17.

d 16 : 4 min :
20.Bb5, (2nd best), -1.93. Best,

1. = (-0.21): 20.Nf3 Nxe1 21.Rxe1 Bc5 22.Bb5 Rxe3 23.fxe3 Rxe3 24.Rxe3 Bxe3+ 25.Kh2 Qf5 26.Bd3 Ne4 27.Bxe4 Qxe4 28.Qc8+ Kh7[] 29.h4 Kg6 30.Qd7 Bf4+ 31.Kh3[] Qf5+ 32.Qxf5+[] Kxf5[] 33.b4 a6 34.Nd4+ Ke5 35.Nf3+

d 16 : 4 min :
White error
22.Rxa1,(not in the first five),
-3.47. Best,

1. (-2.32): 22.Ng5 Qe5[] 23.g3 Qxb2 24.Nxe4 Rxe4 25.Bd3 Nc2[] 26.Bxe4 Nxe4 27.Qe2 Qb3 28.Rc1 Nxe3[] 29.Qxe3 Qxe3 30.fxe3 Bxg3 31.Rc4 f5 32.Kg2 c5 33.Rxe4 fxe4 34.Kxg3[] g5 35.Kf2 Kf7 36.Ke2 Ke6 37.Kd2

d 15 : 3 min :
White error
23.fxe3, (not in the first five),
-5.36.
Best, Bc4, -3.47.

25.Bxe8, -#4.

May-23-11  alachabre: A very quick glance, and my chess head said, "I smell a smothered mate." Didn't even have to pause to think it's queen sac Monday:

27. ... Qg1+
28. Nxg1 Nf2#

May-23-11  alachabre: <ajk68: I am trying to figure out whites 18th move. Is there a reason not to exchange the bishop for a knight, or Qxa7 ?>

My thought is that possibly White feared the tactical complications and wanted to give support to the white square bishop.

May-23-11  sevenseaman: <Patriot> <B) 1...Nb7 2.Qb8+ Rxb8 3.Rxa7+ Bxa7 4.Nc7# > nails it.

A) and C)?

May-23-11  sevenseaman: <Fisher of Men> A Steinkuehler vs Blackburne, 1863 is spot on.
May-23-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <estrick> <Patriot> I think there is a little sense to <12.a3>:


click for larger view

White's ♗c4 is well placed, attacking d5 and f7. 12.a3 gives it a place to retreat along the diagonal should Black play ...Na5 at some point. It's a very common idea.

Perhaps White can get away with this; after all, is Black really primed for an attack in the diagrammed position? I don't know if White played so badly; to my mind, he made an error in judgment in switching too quickly from Slow Positional Crush to Quick Tactical Strike. Black played energetically and well in counterattack when given the chance.

May-23-11  Patriot: <Phony Benoni> You may be right about 12.a3. In fact, keeping the bishop on that diagonal makes a lot of sense because it helps control the square in front of the isolated pawn which may make it possible to advance it in some lines if need be. White also reserves the possibility of playing Ba2-b1 and Qc2 with threats against the black king at some point.

But I do think white was justified with most of his play.

May-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <18.Qxa7 Nc2
19.Bb5 Qd6
Have I missed anything?>

Yes, there's a Bishop on d6.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
French Exchange. Monte Carlo (C01) 0-1 Semi-Smothered Mate
from Attacks a2/a7, b2/b7 and c2/c7 ECO C by FTB by Del ToRo
French Exchange. Monte Carlo (C01) 0-1 Semi-Smothered Mate
from yDecoys To, Deflections From, Remove the Guard by fredthebear
French Exchange. Monte Carlo (C01) 0-1 Semi-Smothered Mate
from QThee Queen is Meaner Volume Three!?! by fredthebear
27...? (May 23, 2011)
from Monday Puzzles, 2011-2017 by Phony Benoni
25...Nf2+! leads to smothered mate in the game continuation
from Mate-in-four by patzer2
miniatures
by goodevans
Kind of Smothered.
from Checkmates- Smothered! by takchess
nice attack
from gourav27's favorite games by gourav27
25...Nf2+! leads to smothered mate in the game continuation
from Mate-in-four by trh6upsz
20...Qe6! defends the Rook with the threat of discovered attack
from Helpless King by trh6upsz
Nice mate with bishop and knight
from Best finals! by titoramia


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC