chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Arnold Denker vs Albert Pinkus
US Championship (1946), New York, NY USA, rd 7, Nov-02
Semi-Slav Defense: Marshall Gambit. Forgotten Variation (D31)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 12 times; par: 43 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Denker/Pinkus games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-20-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: From "If You Must Play Chess" by Arnold Denker, p. 165:

<With my tenth move I offered the sacrifice of a pawn for no immediate advantage other than rapid development and control of the board. Pinkus accepted the sacrfice, and after he did so, I noticed that he wrote something on his score sheet. When he left the table, I leaned over to see what he had written, and there alongside of the move were two words typical of Pinkus: "Show me!" I made my next move, picked up his score sheet and added the words, "Don't worry, I will.">

Mar-20-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: 15...h5 is one of thousands of inexplicable moves on this site.
Mar-20-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <OCF>: Denker on 15...h5:

<"Hoping to get counterplay with 16...Ng4; but the text only creates a new weakness.">

Which explanation probably doesn't make the move any less inexplicable.

Mar-20-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I understand bad moves. Most bad moves involve missing the other side's response. But the persistence in such anti-positional and pointless moves like h5 and f5 etc by decent players is a never ending mystery to me.
Mar-20-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I played over the game after my last post, and I think Black simply missed 16. Qf3. I guess the position isn't all that bad otherwise.
Mar-29-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  hesyrett: Apart from Fine and Reshevsky, in 1946 there really weren't many American chessplayers of GM strength.  Look how easily Botvinnik crushed Denker in the famous radio match.  Pinkus plays about class C strength in this game.
Mar-29-14  Petrosianic: You're right, but it wasn't generally understood at the time. The US had been a major power in the 30's, and the Radio Match was a huge shock.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
An Exchange of Notes - Or Notes to You!
from Solitaire Chess by I. A. Horowitz by SirIvanhoe
Round 7 -- 2 Nov 1946
from 1946 US Championship by crawfb5

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC