chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Johannes Georg Heftye vs Jacques Mieses
"Heftye Bag" (game of the day Apr-06-2011)
Exhibition (1902), Christiania NOR, Sep-11
Italian Game: Giuoco Pianissimo. Italian Four Knights Variation (C50)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 833 more games of J Mieses
sac: 10...Nxd5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can see a list of all games that they have seen recently at their Game History Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-06-11  picard: a crazy game from a quiet opening. what a nice little gem!
Apr-06-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: "Mieses, Mieses, where are my PIECES?"
Apr-06-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Perhaps a U.S.-centric pun. "Hefty Bag" is a brand of trash bag, noted for size and strength. As a result, I fully expect someone to say White's play was garbage. I'm not so sure myself, and it will be interesting to watch Engines for the Defense.

Mieses is generally good for some fun. The whole game has echoes of two of the most famous queen sacrifices: La Bourdonnais vs McDonnell, 1834 and Paulsen vs Morphy, 1857.

White has to accept the queen; after 11.Bxd5/exd5 Bxf3 he will always be a piece behind in the desperado game. 15.a4 seems to quicken the end, but a defense for White is not obvious.

Apr-06-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Another one of Mieses' "what in heaven's name is he DOING???" specialties. I wonder when White was truly helpless, no matter what defense (so far I can't find an improvement on 15.a4). Perhaps 12.0-0 was the final error; would 12.Bg5,Nxg2+; 13.Kd2,Nxf3+; 14.Kc3,Nxg5; 15.Qg1 at least delay the defeat? What of 12.Be7? Letting Black take the only piece that might have defended the d8 square looks suicidal.
Apr-06-11  Oceanlake: Don't like White moving QB twice. Might have been a good idea after Black castles to move h3 before doing Nd5.
Apr-06-11  scormus: As a young novice player I'd get into trouble when I played this opening as W. Always the same theme, the pesky pin on my Nf3 ....
Apr-06-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  piltdown man: I hate those Mieses to pieces.
Apr-06-11  Garech: Very interesting game, for sure. As <An Englishman> pointed out, castling was the mistake. Playing instead 12.Bg5 is the correct continuation, although white has to play accurately to retain the advantage. For example:

12.Bg5 Nxg2+ 13.Kd2 Bxf3 (stronger than Nxf3 where white simply plays Kc1 and he's fine) 14.Qf1! and white survives:


click for larger view

although it's going to be a tricky middlegame, but he can simply aim to simplify to a winning endgame with his queen against two minor pieces. Black's extra pawn is fairly irrelevant, and the g file will be good for the white rooks.

-Garech

Apr-06-11  psmith: <Garech> Fritz 5.32 suggests in your line 12. Bg5 Nxg2+ 13. Kd2 h6!? This surprising move seems to give Black chances. But I can't carry out a full analysis now.
Apr-06-11  Garech: <psmith> I'm using the same engine! Apparently white can play 14.Bxh6 e.g.:

...gxh6 15.Rg1 Kh7 16.Rxg2 Bxg2 17.Qxg2 Rg8 18.Qh3:


click for larger view

and white has a sizeable advantage but the position is still tricky. Black has a knight and rook against the queen and the pawn structure is symmetrical. The g file now looks good for the black rooks an it's not completely clear how white will continue - black is pretty solid. He can aim to advance the centre pawns with c3 and d4, play Rf1 and f4 etc. In any case there is probably good play for both sides - but it's hard not to favour white with the queen. The pawn advances should create some weaknesses to attack and most exchanges will favour white for the endgame, in my opinion.

-Garech

Apr-06-11  janatoli2: Mieses was a very strong master for that time and his opponent an amateur. I think that Mieses wanted to play in a showtime style. Against a strong master he would never have sacrificed his queen like that I believe. Most likely it was just a casual game... (Or has anybody more information about that?)
Apr-06-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Black sacs the queen for a minor piece attack vs the enemy king. When the rook enters the fray,it is time for white to make terms.
Apr-06-11  janatoli2: I just took a closer look. Seems like things are much more complicated and the queen sac is really interesting. 14.Bxh6 is not good I think because of Nxf3+ 15.Kc3 (forced) Bd4+ and Bc5. 14.Qf1 looks more solid but I do not see an advantage after 14. ... Nxf3+ 15.Kc1 Nxg5 16.Qxg2 Bf3 followd by 17... Bxh1 and 18.... Bxf2. 15.Kc3 looks dangerous after Bd4+ and b5. Trying to give back the queen with advantage does not work that easily, either: 12.Kf1 Nxg2 13.Nxd4 Bxd1 approx. equal.

Seems like it is not so easy to show that white is doing better after the queen sacrifice ...

Apr-06-11  ThatsTriflin: Heftye, Heftye, sick sac!
Apr-06-11  psmith: <Garech> <janatoli2>

After 12. Bg5 Nxg2+ 13. Kd2 h6!? 14. Bxh6 Black should play Nxf3+ as <janatoli2> notes, but 15. Kc3 is not forced. Instead we can have 15. Kc1 gxh6 16. Rg1 Bxf2 17. Rxg2 Be3+ 18. Kb1 Nd2+ 19. Qxd2 Bxd2 20. h3 Bf4 with advantage to Black.

Further in <janatoli2>'s line 15. Kc3 Bd4+ 16. Kb3 Bc5 things aren't all that clear... if 17. Kc3 does Black have better than a draw (17...Bd4+) for example? Not to mention the complications after 17. Qf1.

Still this is all pretty unclear and in need of further analysis

Apr-06-11  theodor: 13.h3 - very unclear!
Apr-06-11  lzromeu: <psmith: <Garech> Fritz 5.32 suggests in your line 12. Bg5 Nxg2+ 13. Kd2 h6!? This surprising move seems to give Black chances. But I can't carry out a full analysis now.>

12.0-0 = 12Ooops!

Apr-06-11  David2009: Fascinating game. Let's join it at move 13 (White to play):


click for larger view

Feed this into Crafty End Game Trainer: can I win as White? Link: http://www.chessvideos.tv/endgame-t...

It's past my bed time, I'll find out tomorrow...but at the moment it's not looking good- best I can do is to bail out into an ending a Pawn down. Change the task - can I draw the game?

Open the free Internet link and try your luck. You are white, drag and drop the move you want to make.

Apr-06-11  WhiteRook48: wow, 12 0-0 was just bad
Apr-06-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: The queen sac with 10...Nxd5 11.Bxd8 Nf4 reminds me of J Augustin vs Nunn, 1977
Apr-07-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: The lines after 12.Bg5 are quite interesting, but has anyone run 12.Be7 by the silicon monsters?
Apr-07-11  janatoli2: I agree to <WhiteRook48> that 12. 0-0 loses the game. 15.a4 looks bad but there was no serious defence possible, e.g. 12.Kh1 (idea is Rg1) Bg2+ and 13... d5 similar to the game or 12.Bd5 (to prevent d5) c6. Also 13.h3 as stated by <theodor> does not change much. The extra square h2 for the white king is not helpful, e.g. 13... Bxf3 14.gxf3 d5 15.Bxd5 Rd6 16.Re1 Rg6+, 17.Kh2 Rh6 18.Rh1 Rxh3+ 19.Kg1 Nde2+ wins. Indeed 12.Bg5 and 12.Be7 need to analyzed in more detail but it is already clear that black is not better in the best lines for white. The queen sac did not refute whites weak opening (tame Giuoco Pianissimo, Bc1-e3-g5, Bf1-c4-b5-c4). Moreover, white could have played 10.Bxf6 to destroy blacks kingside and then maybe prepare to castle longside - no queen sac here. Hence maybe also Mieses did not play so convincingly despite the fantastic 10. ...Nxd5 of course (even if he move is not as strong as it looks like). Finally the pseudo sac 4. ... Nxe4! (idea 5.Nxe4 d5) is well known to be good for black - already in 1902 I believe.
May-03-11  sevenseaman: One good thing leads to another. I came here via the POTD.
May-03-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <janatoli2: Finally the pseudo sac 4 ... Nxe4! (idea 5.Nxe4 d5) is well known to be good for black - already in 1902 I believe.>

Here's the earliest example I've seen, along with a better-known game:

Chigorin vs Rosenkranz, 1900, and Tarrasch vs Lasker, 1916.

White has two further options in 5.0-0, which transposes to the Urusov Gambit after 5....Nxc3 6.dxc3, or the weaker 5.Bxf7+.

May-03-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <perfidious> It's much older, of course.

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

I wouldn't be surprised if 4...Nxe4 5.Bxf7+ was considered good for White during much of the 19th century.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Italian Game: Giuoco Pianissimo. Italian Four Knights (C50) 0-1
from 4 NW 4 NE 4 SW 4 SE KP Good to Fredthebear by fredthebear
April 6: Heftye Bag
from Game of the Day 2011 by Phony Benoni
Italian Game: Giuoco Pianissimo. Italian Four Knights (C50) 0-1
from BW P-K4 0-1 Defrosted by Fredthebear by fredthebear
Rosbach's favorite games
by Rosbach
Italian Game: Giuoco Pianissimo. Italian Four Knights (C50) 0-1
from Leearn Checkmates on the 3rd/6th Outer File by trh6upsz
Queen Sacrifices -3
by obrit
Italian Game: Giuoco Pianissimo. Italian Four Knights (C50) 0-1
from Leearn Checkmates on the 3rd/6th Outer File by Patca63
18 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection VII by wwall
opening blunders
by had2x
mastermind7994's favourite games
by mastermind7994

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC