chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Tony Miles vs John Nunn
BCF-ch U18 (1969), Rhyl WLS, Aug-??
Italian Game: Scotch Gambit. Max Lange Attack Long Variation (C55)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 20 more Miles/Nunn games
+ sac: 16.Qf3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-29-14  gabriel112000: This is a great game everybody should see this
Apr-29-14  SpiritedReposte: No doubt. Miles was gaining time like a mofo in this one.
Nov-03-14  TheBish: Wow, incredible attacking game! If I didn't know who had played White, I might guess Paul Morphy!
Feb-23-23  Brenin: After failing with discovered checks, that left only 18 Rxe6. Black's best defence seems to be 18 ... Kxg7, though 19 Nh5+ then wins. Black's real mistake was missing 18 ... Rxg7 19 Nh5+ Kg8 20 Nxg7 Kxg7 with a chance of a draw.
Feb-23-23  Brenin: Thank you, <CG>, for another blast from the past, after yesterday's POTD: Miles and Nunn finished in a four-way tie for joint 2nd in this championship, with 8/11, a point behind Clive Cubitt, whose subsequent chess career was rather less spectacular than theirs.
Feb-23-23  goodevans: <Brenin: ... Black's real mistake was missing 18 ... Rxg7 19 Nh5+ Kg8 20 Nxg7 Kxg7 with a chance of a draw.>

18...Rxg7 19.Rae1 is utterly hopeless for Black.

Feb-23-23  King.Arthur.Brazil: After trying some discovered checks with ♘ and no success, I decide to look at 'possible' sacrifice 18.Re6... which give me two good answers immediately, after 18...Kxe6 19. Re1+: A) Kd6 20. Qd5# and B)Kf7 20. Nh5+ Qf6 21. Qxf6 or 20...Qf5 21. Qxf5#. There remains the question, if Black don't capture the ♖?

I lost my time with 19. Nh5+?. The correct side is 19. Ne8+ because 19... Kh7 20. Qh3+ and mate next! But I don't see a good answer to 19...Raxe8 20. Rxg6+ (I love capture enemy's ♕, but I suspect that this time is not enough) Kxg6 21. Qf7...Therefore, the correct move must be 19. R1-e1... and Black has no defense. Maybe, <Brenin> just said it all... lgs

Feb-23-23  King.Arthur.Brazil: Following game line, which I didn't study, Black could answer 20...Ke7. In such case, 21. Qxe5+ Kd8 22. Qe6! Now, to defend the mate from 22. Qd7#, Black must capture the ♙ with 22... Qxg7 or Rxg7.

Either case, the mate comes from other threat: 23. Qe8+ R (or Q) xe8 24. Rxe8#. 21. Rxe5+ seems to complicate unnecessarily.

Feb-23-23  Cheapo by the Dozen: First rule of non-Monday puzzles:

If one CAN sacrifice at e6, then one MUST sacrifice at e6.

(The first rule of Monday puzzles deals with heavy piece sacrifices on the h-file.)

Feb-23-23  jrredfield: 18 Rxe6 was my first impulse but I wasn't a 100% sure. Just got home and too tired to do serous analysis. At least I didn't jump at 18 Nxg8.
Feb-23-23  vajeer: Black can offer more resistance with 18...Ba5. Fun game I played with computer (with White of course!) that point on... 18...Ba5 19. Qd5 Rad8 20. Qxc4 Qxf6 21. Rxc6+ Kxg7 22. Rxf6 Kxf6 23. b4 Bb6 24. a4 d3 25. cxd3 Rge8 26. a5 Bd4 27. Ra2 Re1+ 28. Kg2 Be5 29. Qb5 b6 30. Qc6+ Kf7 31. Qf3+ Kg7 32. Re2 Rxe2 33. Qxe2 Bf6 34. Qe4 Rd4 35. Qb7 Rxg4+ 36. Kf1 Rxb4 37. a6 Ra4 38. Qxa7 Be5 39. Qb7 Bxh2 40. a7 Kf8 41. a8=Q+ Rxa8 42. Qxa8+ Ke7
Feb-23-23  boringplayer: I kept trying to make the sac on e6 work AFTER the discovered check with Nh5. It didn't occur to me to sac on e6 first :(
Feb-23-23  mel gibson: I got it right -
I eventually guessed the same as the text move.
All the possible Knight moves led nowhere.

Stockfish 15 says:

18. Rxe6

(18. Rxe6 (♖e1xe6 ♗b6-a5 ♕f3-d5 ♖a8-d8 ♕d5xc4 ♕g6xf6 ♖e6xc6+ ♔f7xg7 ♖c6xf6 ♔g7xf6 ♕c4-b5 ♗a5-d2 ♖a1-d1 ♗d2-f4 ♖d1-e1 c7-c5 ♕b5xc5 ♖g8-e8 ♖e1xe8 ♖d8xe8 ♕c5-f5+ ♔f6-e7 h2-h4 d4-d3 ♕f5xd3 ♗f4-e5 h4-h5 ♗e5-f6 c2-c3 a7-a5 ♕d3-e4+ ♔e7-f8 ♕e4-f5 ♔f8-e7 ♕f5xa5 ♔e7-f7 a2-a4 ♔f7-g7 ♔g1-g2 ♖e8-f8 ♕a5-b6 ♖f8-f7 a4-a5 ♔g7-h7 ♕b6-e6 ♖f7-c7 ♕e6-f5+ ♔h7-h8 ♕f5xf6+ ♔h8-h7 ♕f6-f5+ ♔h7-h8 ♕f5xg5 ♖c7-g7 ♕g5-d8+ ♔h8-h7 ♕d8-d3+ ♔h7-h8) +9.59/41 446)

score for White +9.59 depth 41.

Feb-23-23  farticchio: the mistake was 16. ... -hxg5
Feb-23-23  erimiro1: Almost forgot the deadly Max Lange. Thank you for bringing this game. 18.R:e6 is simple, but the key idea was, that Bg5 was immune, so 15.-h6 was a waste of time. 16.-h:g5 was the end, but it seems that the position was already hopeless.
Feb-23-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  agb2002: White is one bishop down.

Black threatens Qxf6.

White can expose the black king with 18.Rxe6:

A) 18... Kxe6 19.Re1+

A.1) 19... Kd6 20.Qd5#.

A.2) 19... Kf7 20.Ne8(h5)+ and mate next.

A.3) 19... Ne5 20.Qd5+ Ke7 (20... Kxf6 21.Qxe5+ Kf7 22.Qe7#) 21.Nxg8+ Rxg8 22.Rxe5+ wins decisive material (22... Kf6 23.Re6+).

B) 18... Kxg7 19.Nh5+ wins decisive material.

C) 18... Rxg7 19.Rae1

C.1) 19... Qxc2 20.Nh5+ Kg8 21.Nxg7 wins decisive material (21... Kxg7 22.Qf6+ and mate soon).

C.2) 19... Nd8 20.Re7+ wins (20... Kf8 21.Nh5+ Kg8 22.Re8+ Kh7 23.Nf6+ etc.).

D) 18... Nd8 19.Nxg8+ Kxe6 20.Re1+ Kd6 (20... Kd7 21.Nf6+ Kc8 22.g8=Q wins decisive material) 21.Qf8+ Kd7 (21... Kc6(d5) 22.Ne7+ and 23.Nxg6) 22.Nf6+ Kc8 23.g8=Q wins decisive material.

E) 18... Rae8 19.Rxe8 Rxe8 (19... Qxf6 20.Qxf6+ Kxf6 21.Rxg8 wins decisive material) 20.Nxe8+ Kxe8 21.Qf8+ Kd7 22.g8=Q wins.

F) 18... Rge8 19.Nxe8+ Kxe6 20.Qf5+ Qxf5 21.g8=Q+ (21.gxf5+ Kf7) 21... Qf7 22.Re1+ Ne5 23.Rxe5+ Kxe5 24.Qxf7 wins decisive material.

G) 18... Qxg7 19.Nh5+ Kxe6 20.Nxg7+ Rxg7 21.Qf5+ Ke7 (21... Kd6 22.Qf6+ and 23.Qxg7) 22.Re1+ will win the rook on g7.

Feb-23-23  Brenin: <goodevans: <Brenin: ... Black's real mistake was missing 18 ... Rxg7 19 Nh5+ Kg8 20 Nxg7 Kxg7 with a chance of a draw.> 18...Rxg7 19.Rae1 is utterly hopeless for Black.>

Thank you. This was a typical late-night typo by me: I intended 16 ... Rxg7, as an improvement on 16 ... hxg5. It was well past my bed-time.

Feb-23-23  cocker: Tony Miles was 14 at the time.
Feb-23-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  scormus: As yesterday, the Holmes method enabled me to decide on 18 Rxe6. Although the text reply led to a quick loss, it forced W to find the win. The alternatives would have allowed W to win easily with "elementary" moves.
Feb-23-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  chrisowen: X mad it was I c jot fenk it was spar beg quality it was have Rxe6 abluff frazzle o arch jah it was add gof peg ned Rxe6 etc :)
Feb-23-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  scormus: <Brenin .... I intended 16 ... Rxg7> Easily done, I often make the mistake of trying to solve POTD first thing in the morning, before I'm properly awake.

It looks rather bleak after 16 ... Rxg7, but B should be able to soldier on, for a while at least. The real problem was the loss of tempi (by 15 ... h3 and 16 ... hxg5) in such a sharp line. It was only just out of book at that point.

According to SFv14, 15 ... Rxg7 would have led to a draw, though B would have needed great defensive skills and strong nerves.

Feb-23-23  King.Arthur.Brazil: <vajeer> Your line is plausable. However, I guess that White can significantly improve his power by placing the ♖ in the fight, for example: 29. Qc6+ Kf7 30. Qxc7+ Ke8 31. Rc2 Re7 32. Qc6+ Kf8 33. Qh6+ Ke8 34. Qg6+ Kf8 35. Rc4 Rf7 36. Qh6+ (Ke8 37.Rxd5 Rxd5? 38. Qh8+ takes the ♖) Ke7 39. Qxg5+ Ke8 40. Qg8+ (Rf8 41.Qe6#) Ke7 41. Rc7+ win the ♖ also.
Feb-23-23  saturn2: Black has a piece more. I found 18.Rxe6 and that black cannot retake...Kxe6 19..Re1 Kf7 20.Nh5 1-0
Feb-23-23  Cibator: <Brenin: Miles and Nunn finished in a four-way tie for joint 2nd in this championship, with 8/11, a point behind Clive Cubitt, whose subsequent chess career was rather less spectacular than theirs.>

Both players were 14 at the time (born only two days apart, I've just discovered), while Cubitt was a good three years older - a big difference at that age, not totally offset by the superiority in native talent of the younger two.

Feb-23-23  Brenin: <Cibator>:Yes, it was quite common (and maybe still ls) for really talented juniors to compete in age-groups several years older than those they were entitled to enter.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Instructive Tactical Finishes
by Easy Point
Tony Miles: 'It's Only Me,' by Geoff Lawton
by suenteus po 147
20 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection VII by wwall
Italian: Scotch Gambit. Max Lange Attk Long Var (C55) 1-0 18.?
from 20 Movers Take FTB 20 Moves ECO B, C Maximo by fredthebear
18.? (Thursday, February 23)
from POTD Two Knights Defense- by takchess
X-FILE :: Jack's Scotch
by lomez
Italian: Scotch Gambit. Max Lange Attk Long Var (C55) 1-0 18.?
from 1930s 40s 50s 60s 70s 80s 90s Rob Ev Paws by fredthebear
20 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection VII by Okavango
Tony Miles: 'It's Only Me,' by Geoff Lawton
by igiene
18.? (Thursday, February 23)
from Puzzle of the Day 2023 by MissScarlett
Agreeable miniatures
by Swedish Logician
20 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection VII by rpn4
0ZeR0's Favorite Games Volume 29
by 0ZeR0

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC