chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Jon Ludvig Hammer vs Magnus Carlsen
Norway Chess (2013), Hidle NOR, rd 7, May-15
Catalan Opening: Open Defense (E04)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 17 times; par: 67 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 16 more J L Hammer/Carlsen games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
May-15-13  atackishki99: Carlsen on the top the next world champ!
May-15-13  fgh: What was the purpose of 32. e4?
May-15-13  beenthere240: In looking at 27 Nb5?!, I'm wondering if Hammer was setting a "trap" for Magnus, ie, ...Bxb5 28. axb5 Qxb5?? 29. e4, winning the black knight.

I can't think of any other reason to double your Q-side pawns and get rid of a well positioned knight.

And as for 32. e4, maybe the pawn just "slid" past e3 like a overzealous shuffleboard shot.

May-15-13  atackishki99: 32. e4 hammer want to create an open file in his rook looking for black weak pawn in c6.but Carlsen didn't give chance and attack his rook in c2 pointing c & f pawns after Ne4 centralized his knight good positioning!
May-15-13  Kinghunt: <beenthere240> I think that has to be it. I can't think of any other reason for Hammer to play Nb5, which has such an obvious drawback.
May-15-13  beenthere240: <Kinghunt> If that was Hammer's idea, it's mighty cheap shot for a GM. But as I recall, a time crunch for Carlsen was already developing.
May-15-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: According to what was said at the press conference, Hammer was quite confident in his position after playing 25.Nd4 (with ideas of Nf5 & Nxe6), and somehow convinced himself that Black has to reply 25...Nc3, after which White has an advantage with 26.Qxc5 bxc5 27.bxc3 cxd4 28.Rxd4 Bxe2; apparently he got flustered when seeing 25...Kf8 instead, which took him completely by surprise (he said this move "won the game" for Carlsen). Very little was actually said about 27.Nb5, except for Carlsen noting that after 26...Rc8, with Nf6 and a queen exchange coming, White should accept that he's a bit worse in any case because of Black's control of the c-file and that "it's not so easy [for White] to find a useful move".
May-15-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: I predicted this result.
May-15-13  Kaspablanca: HeMateMe: What a surprise!, i am shocked, Carlsen beats Hammer!!
May-15-13  WiseWizard: I think this was an excellent opening set-up from Carlsen, I tuned in after 11...Na6 and knew that Hammer would have no chance today, the position is safe with just the right amount of pawn imbalances for creativity.
May-15-13  haydn20: Is 24. Ng5 any good?
May-15-13  Shams: <haydn20> I believe in the post-mortem Carlsen gave 24.Ng5 Nf6 and Black is slightly better.
May-16-13  DcGentle: <<Eyal>: ... apparently he got flustered when seeing 25...Kf8 instead, which took him completely by surprise ...>

Well, apparently Hammer didn't notice the bigger of both threats he had in this position:


click for larger view

Black to move.

White threatens <26. Nxe6 fxe6 27. Bxe6+ Kh8 28. Qxd5 Qxd5 29. Bxd5 Bxe2 30. Rd2>, winning a pawn.

The threat <26. e4> could be countered by <26... Nb4>.

So by his move <25... Kf8> Carlsen just evaded the bishop check of the bigger threat, defusing it.

May-17-13  Boris Schipkov: The position was very drawish.
May-21-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Zenchess: Better is 7. O-O or 7. Na3 instead of 7. Qc2?!. With that move, White gets his Queen pushed around throughout the early stages of the game.
Jun-03-14  tonsillolith: The queenside setup is similar to Stahlberg vs Nimzowitsch, 1934.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Chess Structures _ Rios
by Baby Hawk
Ch. 4: Pg. 76
from Chess Structures: A Grandmaster Guide (M. Rios) by Redvii
Fighting Chess with Magnus Carlsen
by alip
Chess Structures _ Rios
by hakkepof
Chess Structures: A Grandmaster Guide
by smarticecream
Chess Structures: A Grandmaster Guide
by AdolfoAugusto
Chess Structures _ Rios
by stevehrop
Slav Structure
by KingG
Blah
by Penguincw
Fighting Chess with Magnus Carlsen
by jakaiden
Chess Structures _ Rios
by edwin.n.walker
HiperKing Magnus
by Gottschalk
studiare scacchi con Magnus Carlsen
by mariofrisini


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC