chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Shakhriyar Mamedyarov vs Konstantine Shanava
"Shanava Done That" (game of the day Jan-13-2017)
GEO-AZE Friendship (2012), Tbilisi GEO, rd 3, Jun-09
Semi-Slav Defense: Stoltz Variation. Shabalov Attack (D45)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 2,489 more games of Mamedyarov
sac: 19.Qxd5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Olga is our default viewer, but we offer other choices as well. You can use a different viewer by selecting it from the pulldown menu below and pressing the "Set" button.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-09-17  ColeTrane: Shouldnava done that.....
Jan-13-17  razetime: The losing move was Bf5. And then the rampage began.
Jan-13-17  goodevans: I guess <17...Qxd5> is answered with <18.Rxg7+ Kxg7 19.Nf5+>. Right?

<razetime: The losing move was Bf5.> I can't see an alternative to <18...Bf5> that saves black so I think he was already lost by then.

Jan-13-17  Nerwal: 18... ♘xc3 19. ♘xe5 ♗xe5 20. bxc3 ♗e6 may give some drawing chances, at least from the practical point of view. Black has only two bishops for a queen but his position is extremely solid and White has many weak pawns. Even if all the rooks get traded, an endgame ♕ vs 2 ♗ with pawns on one wing may well be drawn.
Jan-13-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  kdogphs: Windmill attack for the win! My favorite of all tactics.
Jan-13-17  goodevans: <Nerwal: 18... ♘xc3 19. ♘xe5 ♗xe5 20. bxc3 ♗e6 may give some drawing chances...>

In a club game maybe, but these are GMs. Shanava knew that would be hopeless against a super-GM like Shaky.

Jan-13-17  Nerwal: <In a club game maybe, but these are GMs. Shanava knew that would be hopeless against a super-GM like Shaky.>

I am not sure it's a matter of level of play. The line he chose loses quickly in linear fashion so anything is better than this at about any level.

Also the material 2♖ + 2♗ can be surprisingly ressourceful against superior forces, there are plenty of examples in chess history like Adams vs Ivanchuk, 1998 or Boleslavsky vs Botvinnik, 1943. Even the pure endgame ♕ vs 2♗ is very difficult; it took Polugaevsky 25 hours of home analysis to win in Polugaevsky vs Geller, 1968.

Jan-13-17  goodevans: <Nerwal: "I am not sure it's a matter of level of play">

Of course it is. I'm certainly much better at screwing up won positions than Shaky!

In first two examples you gave the material imbalance is never as great as at the end of 18... ♘xc3 19. ♘xe5 ♗xe5 20. bxc3 so I don't think these add weight to your argument.

<"The line he chose loses quickly in linear fashion so anything is better...">

Not <anything>, but I would agree that your line is better. But that's not my point: I never said that <18...Bf5> was the best move, just that it <wasn't the losing move> because the position is already lost. Your line may lose more slowly but I'm convinced it still loses with best play.

Jan-13-17  ChessHigherCat: 17. Qd3 was extremely tricky, considering that black can take the B on d5 with either the Q or N. If 17...QxB, 18 Rxg7 Kh8 19. Qh7#. Or if 17...QxB, 18 Rxg7 Kxg7, 19. Nf5++ Kg6 20. Nd7++ at least wins back the Q and there's probably a mating net I'm missing. But what's white's plan if 17..NxB?. 18. Rh7 looks messy here because now white can play QxR.
Jan-13-17  ChessHigherCat: <good evans> Sorry, I just saw you already asked about Qxd5 but since the question still hasn't been answered we can hope for more analysis (especially what happens on 17. Nxd5)
Jan-13-17  goodevans: <ChessHigherCat>

No problem.

As for what happens on <17... Nxd5> I'm fairly confident it's <18.Nf3>. ;o)

Jan-13-17  ChessHigherCat: <goodevans> I think 18. Rxg7 looks a lot more forcing (see my analysis two messages above). Do you see anything wrong with it?
Jan-13-17  goodevans: <ChessHigherCat>

18.Rxg7 is, I think, the right response to 17...Qxd5 as per your analysis in your first post. But you also observed that if 17...Nxd5 then it doesn't work the same.

The reason I said I'm confident that white's plan for <17...Nxd5> was <18.Nf3> is that that's what was actually played. ;o)

Jan-13-17  ChessHigherCat: <goodevans> Duhh, I get it:-) I got so hung up analyzing that move that I didn't even think to look ahead at what was actually played
Jan-13-17  scutigera: <Nerwal>: It's a pretty good combo against equal force, too: Sultan Khan vs Capablanca, 1930
Jan-13-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: Where's <thegoodanarchist> when U knead'm?

*****

Jan-13-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: The Ole "Wind Mill": We are "Breaking Wind" while the defense is "Milling Around"

Thats a Gas

LOL

*****

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Best Attacking games book by Naidistsch
by FLAWLESSWIN64
finally 2Ps up
from Tactics: windmill by Baby Hawk
January 13: "Shanava Done That
from Game of the Day 2017 by Phony Benoni
"Shanava Done That" (game of the day Jan-13-2017)
from motel swim pool Dipped Fredthebear D50-D99 cool by fredthebear
Semi-Slavaks Def D40s
by fredthebear
Game 3
from 2012-2015 Attacking Games (Naiditsch/Balogh) by Qindarka
Volume 16, Game 2
from # Chess Evolution Volumes 1-50 by Qindarka
Game 3
from 2012-2015 Attacking Games (Naiditsch/Balogh) by rajeshupadhyay
Shabalov 7...dxc4
by SeazerCZ
Game collection: QGD
by cheerios6969
Best Attacking games book by Naidistsch
by trh6upsz
finally 2Ps up
from 668 windmill (discovered checks) by whiteshark
Stoltz
from A001 QGD: Semi-Slav [White] by chess.master
finally 2Ps up
from 668 windmill (discovered checks) by trh6upsz

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC