chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Frederick Rhine vs D Gregory Bungo
Greater Midwest Classic (2013), Rosemont, IL USA, rd 4, Jul-06
Budapest Defense: Fajarowicz Variation (A51)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 91 more games of F Rhine
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-06-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: The only <FSR> game left without comment so lets make it a good one:

CRUSH!

Aug-07-13  KlingonBorgTatar: I'll start with the pun: Cracked Skull.
Aug-07-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: Like A Rhinestone Cowboy
Aug-07-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Check It Out> That pun was suggested by me, and used by CG.com, for K Thompson vs F Rhine, 1992 (the first pun I ever submitted).
Aug-07-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: I analyzed this game in my forum, and at http://chicagochess.blogspot.com/20... .
Aug-07-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: How about: A River Runs Through It

or

Danube, Rhine!

Aug-07-13  DoctorD: Rhine plays the Main line.
Aug-08-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Bungo in the Jungle.
Feb-03-14  PaulLovric: more like Death on the river Rhine!
Feb-03-14  john barleycorn: i could think of a good pun if the opponents name was Bunga...
Feb-03-14  torrefan: You should know that bungo is the tagalog word for skull. Bunga is fruit.
Feb-03-14  john barleycorn: take the italian fruits...bunga bunga
Feb-03-14  PaulLovric: something to do with Hercule Poirot (Gregory Bungo Poirot) and "death on the Rhine", would be a clever pun
Feb-04-14  Abdel Irada: Bungo in the Jungo?

Jun-04-15  bmcniece: Damn, powerful opening, good job. I definitely like Qc2 in this opening best as well
May-13-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: This game was from the Greater Midwest Classic. http://www.uschess.org/msa/XtblMain... I had played as the "guest master" at a G/40, delay/5 event four months before (my first regular-rated tournament of the millennium!), where I had dropped my master rating due to a time pressure misadventure. http://chicagochess.blogspot.com/20... Delay is <not> the same as increment (the latter is <much> preferable), as I had discovered to my dismay.

Silver lining: I was enabled to play as an under-2200 here - my <second> regular-rated tournament of the millennium. (Third if you count the 2000 U.S. Masters, but you shouldn't. The millennium began in 2001.) I tied for second, winning $700, by far the most money I've ever won. It's good to see that I'm not totally over the hill at almost 53.

This game was played on Board 1 in Round 4. My opponent was the sole leader at 3-0. I was one of five players a half-point behind.

Rhine (2185)- D Gregory Bungo (floored at 2000) July 6, 2013

<1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5> This was my third White already. My first two White games had been King's Indians and I had managed to win both, but by no means smoothly. I had heard that my opponent played the Modern, so after he'd played 1...Nf6 I expected 2...g6 with yet another King's Indian. The Budapest was a welcome surprise. <3.dxe5 Ne4?!> The Fajarowicz! This opening has never made any sense to me, and this game did nothing to alter that opinion. But I was kicking myself for not studying it. Fajarowicz fanatic Dean Arond was also playing in the section, but I knew I wouldn't play him so I hadn't bothered looking at it. <4.a3> Looks like a waste of time, but this is considered perhaps the best line against the Fajarowicz. With ...Bb4+ stopped, the knight on e4 looks silly.

<4...d6> Black usually interpolates 4...Nc6 5.Nf3. There's also 4...Qh4!?, introduced in O'Kelly vs Bisguier, 1969. Bisguier drew in 12 moves, but almost everyone else has lost, often quickly. http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches... Wiegel vs G Fiebig, 1984 (1-0, 9) shows how White should play. But one White player did lose: in A J Whiteley vs A Dunn, 1989, IM Whiteley lost to an unknown in 6 moves! Then there's 4...b6, which I'm told is a good weapon in blitz, accompanied by a horrified facial expression so as to tempt 5.Qd5!? But Komodo 12 says it's still good for White after 5...Bb7 6.Qxb7 Nc6 7.b4! and now 7...a6 8.f3 Rb8 9.Qxb8 or 7...Rb8 8.Qa6 Nxf2! 9.Nf3 Nxg1 10.g3. But simply 5.g3 Bb7 6.Nf3 (+0.90) is best. <5.Qc2> The move 4.a3 prepared. Another six-move Fajarowicz special (is there anything to the opening besides traps?): 5.exd6 Bxd6 6.g3?? Nxf2! 0-1 M Warren vs Jan Selman, 1932. <5...d5> Very logical, this Fajarowicz: 4...d6 and 5...d5. Well, I guess it does destroy my dreams of capturing en passant. Dean (and theory) prefer 5...Nc5. An important point is that 5...Bf5 is met by 6.Nc3! Ng3 (6...Nxc3 7.Qxf5 Nd5 8.e6±) 7.e4! Bxe4 8.Nxe4 Nxh1 9.exd6± (the knight on h1 will fall, leaving White with two bishops for a rook), à la Reshevsky vs Bisguier, 1954. It's a bad sign for an opening when the most theoretically important game was played almost 65 years ago. <6.cxd5> Not bad, but Watson and Houdini prefer 6.e3! <6...Qxd5 7.Nc3 Nxc3 8.Qxc3 Nc6>

TO BE CONTINUED . . . .

May-13-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Now the natural 9.Nf3 Bg4 10.Bf4 0-0-0 would give Black some compensation for the pawn, so . . . <9.Bf4!> Here, Komodo recommends 9...Be6 10.Rd1 Qc5 11.Qxc5 Bxc5 with some (but not enough) positional compensation for the pawn. White's pawn structure with the pawn on e5 is somewhat reminiscent of the "Berlin Wall" against the Ruy Lopez, except that here the pawn is extra. <9...Bf5 10.Rd1!> The point of 9.Bf4. No 0-0-0 for you! <10...Qe4> Again, 10...Qc5 is better, but trading queens and trying to grovel a draw is no fun. <11.e3 Nb4?> The sort of thing that Budapest/Fajarowicz players dream of. But why should this cowabunga (cowabungo?) attack work? <12.f3> Yawn. <12...Nc2+ 13.Kf2 Qa4> Threatening 14...Nxe3 15.Bxe3 Qxd1. <14.b3?!> Very careless! Beware of complacency in a winning position! This move gets the question mark for its objective merit, and the exclam for succeeding so well. Simply 14.Rd2! or 14.Rc1! leaves White with a won game. The knight on c2 is not long for this world. <14...Qxa3??> Luckily, my opponent was equally careless, overlooking my next move. I was rightly worried about 14...Qc6!, when Black would suddenly be back in the game! Then on 15.Qxc6 bxc6, Black's knight has a flight square - thanks to the stupid 14.b3? - and the half-open b-file will enable Black to attack White's b-pawn. <15.Bb5+> Crushing. Komodo immediately announces mate in 17! Black's <best> line (apart from "resigns") is the abject 15...Bd7 16.Bxd7+ Kd8. <15...c6> 15...Ke7 is mated by 16.Qxc7+ Ke6 17.Qd7#. <16.Bxc6+ Ke7> Here, annoyingly, I saw no quick mate, e.g. 17.Bg5+ f6 18.exf6+ Kf7 and the king can run to g6, so I decided to take all of Black's pieces. <17.Bxb7> Threatening 18.Bxa8 and, worse, 18.Qc7+ and mate next. Imagine, Black has sacrificed two pawns to reach this position! Komodo says that it's mate in 12 more moves. <17...Rd8> <18.Bg5+ f6 19.exf6+ Kf7 20.Rxd8> Greg decided to call it a day.
Sep-06-19  Serpentin: thanks FSR!

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Budapest Defense: Fajarowicz Var (A51) 1-0 FSR explains
from Whites D-4 by fredthebear
Budapest Defense: Fajarowicz Var (A51) 1-0 FSR explains
from Annotations by Various Authorities & Fredthebear by mneuwirth
Budapest Defense: Fajarowicz Var (A51) 1-0 FSR explains
from Briefly Mostly A-D-E by fredthebear
Queen's Pawn 2
by GiantPickle
Budapest Gambit (White)
by bmcniece

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC