chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Veselin Topalov vs Francisco Vallejo Pons
"Top This" (game of the day Feb-01-2015)
Chess Olympiad (2014), Tromso NOR, rd 3, Aug-04
Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation (A85)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 7 times; par: 67 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 29 more Topalov/F Vallejo Pons games
sac: 19.Qxf8+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-11-14  notyetagm: Topalov vs Vallejo-Pons, 2014

<Kinghunt: Amazing game by Topalov. This has to make his top games list.>

Yes, this is one of Topalov's all-time best games. Especially since he was playing against a 2700-strength player.

Aug-11-14  posoo: now dis - DIS - is a scorcher of a game. GOD BLESS da toplove, and cognrats on an excellent idea.

To be perfectly honest, I'd have played QxF4 in an instant (I only play BLITZ) not seeing dat i'd get trapped next move!

THEN however I think I'd be able to gobble up da material and do nearly as well as tupple in a slow-roasting barnburner.

YOURE SO SLOW, I have to play you FAST!

Aug-11-14  Marmot PFL: Topalov beat Vallejo-Pons, Vallejo-Pons beat Kramnik, and Kramnik beat Topalov.
Aug-12-14  visayanbraindoctor: This could be the best game in the Olympiad. A genuine tactical brilliancy.

Stylistically Topalov is of the same line as Alekhine, Tal, and Kasparov. These people just can't help it; somehow they just keep on producing these tactical masterpieces.

Aug-19-14  drtombari: this has to be topalov's immortal game
Aug-20-14  computer chess guy: 9. .. g5 looks very questionable.
Aug-20-14  SetNoEscapeOn: < newzild: A fine game by Topalov, but in my opinion 18. Qxf5 is not quite so amazing as has been suggested, as White gets full material compensation (Rook, minor piece and pawn) plus the initiative.>

In fact white gets two pawns (the d pawn is dead) so the operation leaves Topalov ahead in material.

This is, of course, an outstanding positional game. But in my opinion not one of the greatest played by Vesselin.

Jan-04-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Great game, although I have to agree that any reference to a Queen sac is simply wrong, White was more than compensated in material. Which certainly doesn't diminish his effort. The material imbalance reminds me of Topa in his heyday where he'd sac an exchange without batting an eye.
Jan-05-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gilmoy: Yah, it's more a case of a strategic flaw in this line. It cedes to White the <freedom of choice> between two lines, <18.Qxf5> or not. It's always a risk to let a player of Topalov's caliber have that choice with no pressure: his OTB deep-think might really exceed your shallow analysis from years ago.

Surely Topalov saw the possibility 3-5 moves in advance (from <14.d5 e5?!>). Hence <18.Qxf5> means he's already judged it to be better. In fact, he must have seen beyond his own exchange sac to the unstoppable-pawn theme to make that assessment.

<25.Bg3> may have puzzled Vallejo Pons: <Why do that now?> It gave him a free tempo to defuse the exchange sac, e.g. 25..Ne8, which suggests that he missed <26.Rxf6!> and the grand conceptual shift from tactical material-grubbing to rosette-escort with <everything protecting everything else> -- which utterly trumps a lone Q. His desperado exchange sac (down RN+PPP for Q) removes the wrong B, and the f2-DSB chain is a fortress by itself.

Jan-17-15  Abdel Irada: <Beholder: <Sally Simpson: I suppose beauty is in the eye of beholder>

Damn right it is. Beauty is in my eye ONLY.>

Didn't I meet you in a game of D&D in the early eighties? :-D

Feb-01-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: No comment. I'm just here so I don't get fined.
Feb-01-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: I ain't got nothin' for y'all.
Feb-01-15  yadasampati: What a magnificent play by Topalov! Especially i admire 25. Bg3, making space for the king and preparing 30. Kh2. This move escapes from the Queen check and keeps the white bishop in active play. Such a foresight!
Feb-01-15  Steve.Patzer: I am too sleepy. What is the finish? <Phony Benoni> Great line.
Feb-01-15  fisayo123: I'm glad this magnificent game finally gets the limelight it warrants.
Feb-01-15  fisayo123: This is the thanks Paco gets for seconding Topalov in his WC match?
Feb-01-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: I'm just gonna sit here and look at this game for 3 minutes.
Feb-01-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Great game by Topalov. 31 more collections, and it'll be listed in his top 10. :D
Feb-01-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: Worthy of game of the day status. Shocking queen sac that IMO embodies what a positional sacrifice should be. I don't really have words to describe the beauty of this game. If you are not impressed, you either don't understand chess or you don't really like chess.
Feb-01-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <Steve.Patzer> It's not one of those slam-bang finishes with checks and sacrifices and other fireworks. Black is simply helpless:


click for larger view

Left to his own devices White has various ideas, such as 44.e4 / 45.Nf5 / 46.Rg7#. Black's bishop doesn't have time to help out, and his queen is badly tied down by the promotion threat. Black not only has no good checks, he has trouble even threatening one. For instance, 43...Qc5 is countered by 44.Ne6 Qd6+ 45.Nf4+.

It's not any sort of zugzwang, just total domination. The position simply floats in midair while White takes his time playing the threat of his choice and Black can do nothing about it.

Feb-01-15  morfishine: If this isn't a Queen-sac, I don't know what is. According to Rudolph Spielmann, there are 'real' sacrifices and 'sham' sacrifices. What separates 'real' and 'sham' sacrifices is the 'sham' sacrifice immediately recovers the material and/or immediately forces mate, while the 'real' sacrifice is more "positional" in nature. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_...

What really elevates this game is the exchange-sac <26.Rxf6> which is very real in nature since material is spent for a positional advantage. While there is no immediate mate, the move is forcing and it enhances White's positional plus.

*****

Feb-01-15  schnarre: ...Very impressive Queen sac & follow-up!
Feb-01-15  drnooo: seems to me the threat is rook check, then interpose it behind the pawn and theres no way to stop the queening, or did someone mention that not sure if there is any way to stop it the very next m0ve
May-07-15  posoo: I meant qxF5.
May-07-15  ToTheDeath: <Phony Benoni>: <Black not only has no good checks, he has trouble even threatening one. For instance, 43...Qc5 is countered by 44.Ne6 Qd6+ 45.Nf4+.>

Funny, I was thinking White would answer 43...Qc5 with 44. Re6+ 45.Kg7 45.Rc6! winning. Clearly many roads lead to Rome here.

Fantastic attack, from the Queen sac which was fairly standard actually to the methodical maneuvers and tactics to break Pons down. A gem!

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Codex9000's favorite games
by codex9000
Advanced Queen sacs
by trh6upsz
scholes' favorite games
by scholes
The Dutch Defense (and Anglo-dutch)
by Jersey Joe
Advanced Queen sacs
by obrit
tivrfoa's favorite games
by tivrfoa
98_A46+A48+D02 ... L O N D O N SYSTEM !!!
by whiteshark
52b_Midddlegames - The Q vs RN thing (and endgam
by Jaredfchess
Repertorio
by Gottschalk
Chess Network Videos: Part 2
by Penguincw
Topalov sacrifices a queen and rook in a positional win
from Penguincw's Favourite Games by Penguincw
Challenger Topalov
by Gottschalk
Dutch Defense
by ISeth
Tough Guess-the-Move Challenges!
by Whitehat1963
Unexpected exchange sacs develop into superior position and win
from MJCB likes those games by MJCB
Bruce Graham's favorite games
by Bruce Graham
The Dutch Defense (and Anglo-dutch)
by Zhbugnoimt
(A85) Dutch, with c4 & Nc3, 43 moves, 1-0
from Que up Fredthebear's Queen Pawn Game on Que by fredthebear
Topalov sacs everything
from PhilFeeley's Favourite Games by PhilFeeley
Having fun with the QP
by yiotta
plus 21 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC