chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Vladimir Kramnik vs Ian Nepomniachtchi
Dortmund Sparkassen (2015), Dortmund GER, rd 3, Jun-30
Zukertort Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A04)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 39 more Kramnik/Nepomniachtchi games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-30-15  Marmot PFL: Once players reach age 40 they naturally tend to wear down in the last hour of play.
Jun-30-15  visayanbraindoctor: This is an example of playing subpar moves in order to preserve winning chances.

After 21. Rc5 Rfd8 question is why did Kramnik not play 22. Na3 followed by Nxc4?

After 22. Na7 Rd2, again why did he not play 23. Rxa5?

In both cases White would have won a clear pawn. However, looking at what may happen with subsequent reasonable moves, the ending probably almost by force goes into 4 pawn vs 3 pawn all in the Kingside, or one in which both Black Rooks become quite active. Along the way black also gets to exchange his Bishop for a White Knight.

One such reasonable variation: 23. Rxa5 Rxb2 24. Nc6 Rb7 25. Rb5 Rxb5 26. Nxb5 Nxa4 27. Rxc4, and although White is a pawn up, Black should have no difficulty in holding the ending.

A 4 pawn vs 3 pawn all in the Kingside ending is a theoretical draw. So are most Rook endings where the defender, even down by a pawn, has active rooks. So Kramnik avoided it and instead began playing for a direct attack on the Black King choosing to retain his two Knights. As crazy at it might look, it was his only practical chance for a win.

His plan is becoming clearer after another subpar move 25. Ncb5, instead of defending his b-pawn with 25. Rb1 which would have allowed sooner or later the simplifying exchange BxNc3.

By 33. Kg2 Nxe2, the game looks dead equal, and it should be except for chances of a mating attack by White, which is what Kramnik probably wanted (since he had decided to retain his two knights as discussed above).

He straightaway plants a Knight on d6 by 34. Nc4 Ba1 35. Nbd6+

Then for the next several moves, White essentially does nothing, just moving his pieces around while avoiding exchanges. The character of the position is such that White can just maintain it almost indefinitely, while waiting for a Black error.

It must be said that Nepomniachtchi defended wonderfully and accurately for all of the game out of an almost lost opening, finding only move defenses. Yet he must have found the knight on his Q3 square a real pain. Imagine having to defend for 50 moves with that knight planted in the middle of your position. And eventually blunder he did, 46.. Be5, allowing a mating attack 47. Nb7 Nc3 48. Nd8, which can only be warded off by sacking a pawn in a compromised position.

Some kibitzers may wonder why this game was not abandoned as a dead draw on move 40. The reason is that humans make mistakes in difficult and annoying endings in which the attacker can maintain the character of the position indefinitely without much risk, while waiting for an error from a non-computer also human opponent. (Among World Champions, Fischer and now Carlsen are particularly good in this kind of strategy.)

Jul-01-15  visayanbraindoctor: It must also be said that Nepo's blunder 46.. Be5 was only too human. He was trying to get rid of the pain in his neck, the White Knight on d6.
Jul-01-15  Sokrates: Thanks, <visayanbraindoctor>, for your erudite analysis. After having defended so well, Nepo must have felt pretty disappointed about this outcome. Patiently and accurately played by Kramnik, though.
Jul-02-15  SimplicityRichard: <This is an example of playing subpar moves in order to preserve winning chances.>

In a word, "patience".

<visayanbraindoctor> Brilliant analysis as usual.#

Jul-02-15  Ulhumbrus: 6...d5?! is open to question. Black has got into trouble before by trying ...d5 like this in an English opening eg in the game Petrosian vs Korchnoi, 1962

One alternative to 10...Nb6 is 10...Nc5

Jul-02-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: After Kramnik's 48 Nd8 threatening mate in one with Rf7:


click for larger view

The position could be tweaked into a minor 'White to win a piece' study. The board is a minefield of Knight forks.

Black cannot really take off the Rooks.

48... Rxd7 49. Nxd7+ Ke7 50. Nxe5 Kxd8 51. Nxg6.


click for larger view

The coming Nf4 ands Nxh5 is next.

-----


click for larger view

Moving the Bishop to give e5 to the Black King fails.

48...Bd4 49 Nc4 g5 (now forced ) 50.Rd6+


click for larger view

And Ke7 (Nc6+) or Kg7 (Ne6+) drops the d4 Bishop.

---

Also on the 48...Bd4 there lurks a cunning wee pseudo sac...


click for larger view

49.Nd5+ (always look at checks) 49...Nxd5 50.Rd6+!


click for larger view

And no matter where the King goes (e7 or g7) White will play Rxd5 and the pinned d4 Bishop will fall to Rxd4 and a Knight fork check. or will simply be won with Nc6.

What about 50...Ke5 that meets 51.Re6 mate.


click for larger view

The 49.Nd5+ line is a darling of a variation. An unheard Melody.

----


click for larger view

48...Bb8 hides a cute line.

48...Bb8 49.Rf7+ Ke5 50.Nd7+ Ke4.


click for larger view

White cannot take on b8 yet as the d8 Knight hangs.
So you use the Black King to stop the attack on d8.

52.Re7+ the King is forced onto the d-file then White can play Nxb8.

In the game Nepomniachtchi played 48...g5 and went into the lost Knight ending which does look it could not be avoided without dropping a piece.

They are just four of the cute lines. There are others.

As usual with most games at this level the merry and pretty lines are buried in the unplayed
variations. The fun is digging them out so you can get some kind of an inkling what they saw and avoided.

----

When he was 13 or there about, Carlsen was a huge Kramnik fan and this grind but keeping the game alive style that Carlsen sometimes adopts possibly came from that.

The difference being when Kramnik is on the blunder-hunt forcing his opponent to make the correct move time after time it's appears to be done with more panache, more grace.

Jul-06-15  visayanbraindoctor: <Sokrates: Thanks, <visayanbraindoctor>, for your erudite analysis. After having defended so well, Nepo must have felt pretty disappointed about this outcome. Patiently and accurately played by Kramnik, though.>

Appreciate it. Kramnik though isn't as consistent as he used to be in his endgame grind-outs. Often nowadays. he makes errors, turning endgame wins into draws and draws into losses. He has obviously and significantly fallen off from his 2000 standard.

<Sally Simpson> Nice post on the beauty of the potential variations.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC