Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Magnus Carlsen vs Evgeny Tomashevsky
Tata Steel Masters (2016), Wijk aan Zee NED, rd 6, Jan-22
Indian Game: London System (A46)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 27 times; par: 51 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 4 more Carlsen/Tomashevsky games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-22-16  Marmot PFL: Tomashevshy chooses a lost ending (20...Ne4) rather than face the attack. Not sure how dangerous the white threats really were or if black was afraid of ghosts. But it looks dangerous enough, as Bb7 is passive and white controls e5 (both consequences of black playing d5).
Jan-22-16  kamagong24: Magnus made it look simple here
Jan-22-16  MindCtrol9: Carlsen is playing good chess where he combines positional play with attacking aggressive manuevers.I like to see the energy in the game of chess.Carlsen is showing that he is the WC and he won't be easy for any challenger.
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: yeah, building small advantages--MC kept the black bishop blocked in by its own e file pawn, with well timed center exchanges, and then posting the Knight on e5. Black was forced to exchange queens, then make ugly moves to try and make some room to free up the Bishop.
Jan-22-16  Karposian: Carlsen chose a London System setup, which again shows its usefulness if the purpose is simply to get to a fairly even and playable middlegame, and try to outplay the opponent from there, which is exactly what Carlsen did in this game.

The London System has increased in popularity recently. Some years ago Kamsky was the only top GM who employed it regularly, now several of the top players use it from time to time.

Jan-22-16  devere: It seems that Black's failure to play 20...cxd4 before Ne4 cost him the game. That, and the premature resignation.
Jan-22-16  JohnBoy: The little intermezzos like 17.Rf1 really get me. Same thing happened with Bh6 in Carlsen vs M Vachier-Lagrave, 2015. MC pulls this stuff out of a magic hat.
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: It's funny to compare the position here after 12.Rad1:

click for larger view

Seven pieces clutter the d-file.

And here after 23....dxe4:

click for larger view

24.dxc5 bxc5 25.Rd7 and the rook rules the board. Note that after 25....Rab8 26.b3 Black can't oppose with 26....Rfd8 because of 27.Rh8+ Kxh8 28.Nxf7+.

Jan-22-16  csmath: Clean game, Tomashevsky self-destructs. Typical positional win.
Jan-22-16  Ulhumbrus: 13 Bxg6 concedes the bishop pair. After the exchange of dark squared bishops Black will want a position where his remaining bishop is more valuable than a knight instead of less valuable. This suggests playing for the advance ...e5.

Instead of 17...Nd7, 17...Ne4 plays for the pawn advances ...f5 and ...g5

Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: I don't understand how Carlsen wins, especially just dominating elite GMs. But it sure is interesting to watch.

Definitely my favorite active players are MC and Wesley So. They play with great imagination.

Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Carlsen pointed out that Black's best defense was 19...Nh7 20 Rxf4 g5 which looks like it could hold.

if 21 Rg4 f6 22 Nf3 Qc7 23 Qe1 Rae8 and it is not easy to break through.

click for larger view

Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Watching it again, Carlsen did say he would have gone for 19...Nh7 20 exf4 "with a very pleasant position"
Jan-22-16  scholes: Tomas was down to nearly 2 min by move 20. If he had not forced exchange of queens, he would have surely blundered in ensuing complicated position.
Jan-23-16  WDenayer: This game is also very strange. If it is true what Scholes says that Tomashevsky was down to nearly 2 minutes at move 20, it is even much worse. The same happened against Van Wely. First Van Wely missed a continuation which would have given him a distinct advantage and after the N sac, he missed the winning continuation. In this game, Carlsen won because the rook ended up on c7. If Tomashevsky would have played 20. Ö cxd4 and then 21. Ö Ne4, White would have been better (bad bishop against good knight), but there is no win. If the Qs come off, Black can probably defend. I donít think that Carlsen would come far with his London against Caruana or Giri. He will probably win Tata, but in my opinion the way he plays betrays opportunism. Giri never. Look how he won his game. This is the dull, no risk, I know everything, I take no chances whatsoever, I am not playing any opening which is not top notch approach. I think that some people lose their nerves against Carlsen. It is absolutely not normal to have ca. 2 mins left by move 20.
Jan-24-16  kilurah: White's Rook so intimidative...!
Jan-25-16  elnanes23: what i admire most about Magnus, is his ability to turn his doubled pawns into a threat and his opponents doubled pawns into a weaknes.
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Daniel ♔ analyses this game:


Feb-04-16  yurikvelo: Two moves decided this game:
19. ... Qd8? (Nh7!)
20. ... Ne4? (cxd4!)


Premium Chessgames Member
  maxi: Even after 15.Ne5 White's advantage is moot, but 15...g5 allows the computer-like Carlsen plan 16.f4! gxf 17.Rf1!. Perhaps the position is not lost yet for a computer, but is very hard for a human to survive.
Aug-19-18  mandor: What a clean game. And how nicely after strategic part, comes the tactically and inbetween move 17.Rf1! (exd2? 18.Rxf6!), and then, after exchange Queens go for superior ending.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
London System vs QID/Ne7 (A46)1-0 W promptly trades off both Bs
from QFianchettos by fredthebear
5th Win in Wijk
from The Carlsen Chronicles Part I - Wonderboy by MoonlitKnight
London System vs QID/Ne7 (A46)1-0 W promptly trades off both Bs
from Qside Fianchettos; Zukertort, QID & Tartakower by fredthebear
Volume 205, Game 2
from # Chess Evolution Volumes. 201-235 by Qindarka
**London System (A46)
from Instant Repertoire 11 by FLAWLESSWIN64
Game 10
from 2016 Exciting Games (Naiditsch/Balogh/Maze) by Qindarka
studiare scacchi con Magnus Carlsen
by mariofrisini
rodmalone's favorite games carlsen
by rodmalone
Ne5 middlegame
from 55e_Middlegames - strategic OUTPOST ! by Jaredfchess
from Carlsen's Unusual Openings by theidiot117
Ne5 middlegame
from 55e_Middlegames - strategic {N} OUTPOST ! by whiteshark
Fighting Chess with Magnus Carlsen
by jakaiden
Fighting Chess with Magnus Carlsen
by alip
AdamLedfordGenesis' favorite games
by AdamLedfordGenesis
King Carlsen
by Zhbugnoimt
A nice smooth London game
from PhilFeeley's Favourite Games by PhilFeeley
98_A46+A48+D02 ... L O N D O N SYSTEM !!!
by whiteshark

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC