chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Magnus Carlsen vs Wei Yi
Tata Steel Masters (2017), Wijk aan Zee NED, rd 4, Jan-17
Bishop's Opening: Berlin Defense (C24)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 12 times; par: 60 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 7 more Carlsen/Wei Yi games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-17-17  ozu: +3 funny!!
Jan-17-17  Marmot PFL: Ayler is right, but so hard to play quietly when the time is short.
Jan-17-17  Pedro Fernandez: Yeah <AylerKupp>, almost sure the lack of time was the cause of his unfortunate last moves.
Jan-17-17  ozu: Even still, the last moves reveal a great deal about what Carlsen saw in the position.
Jan-17-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <Pedro Fernandez> Yes, and I was certainly wrong about this being a long game!
Jan-17-17  spingo: <ozu: +3 funny!!>

+1!

Jan-17-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mateo: In the post mortem interview, Carlsen criticized 18...exd4.
Jan-17-17  Pedro Fernandez: Where can I see that interview <Mateo>? Thanks!
Jan-17-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <Pedro Fernandez> It just finished but you can see other commentary by Seirawan at http://www.tatasteelchess.com/live/....
Jan-17-17  miroo: FIDE rating: 2706? He do not see that lose knight?
Jan-17-17  metatron2: After briefly looking at this game, my impression is that Carlsen played well, but Wei Yi played surprisingly anti-positional game:

18.. exd4 losing the grip in the center for no visible reason

23.. d5 invites white's e5 push, with king-side pawn majority that is rolling over the center (did Wei really think that his g7-g5 advance will break this pawns chain?)

29.. g5 chronically weakening the critical f5 square without really breaking the pawns chain

and finally:

30.. c5 willingly breaking his awn pawn chain that happens to support his Ne4 (that is otherwise trapped..)

I don't really understand what Wei was thinking here. Maybe he was intimidated by Carlsen..

Jan-17-17  Ulhumbrus: After 24 e5 Black's worst placed piece is his queen's rook. 24...Rad8 develops it.

After 25 f4 White's king side pawn majority enjoys a lead in development of no less than four moves over Black's queen side pawn majority.

After 26 Rxc2 White's queen's rook is two moves ahead of Black's queen's rook in develoment

After 28 Kf3 White's king is two moves ahead of Black's king in development and White may end up playing with an extra a king in some endings.

In all, in the position after 28 Kf3 White's pieces are four moves ahead of Black's pieces in development and White's king side pawns are four moves ahead of Black's queen side pawns in development.

After 33 cxd5 White's king has helped to trap Black's knight.

All this begins to suggest that the reason why Wei Yi lost is that at some point Wei Yi began to neglect his development.

In the position after 23 Rac1 White's king side pawns are ahead in development of Black's queen side pawns and White's pieces are ahead in development of Black's pieces. This suggests that 23...d5 is inadvisable as it opens lines and it may be better to prepare this move first by moves such as eg...f6 and ...Rad8.

Carlsen does not open lines but closes them by e5. One possible explanation or one possible part of an explanation for this may be that a part of White's lead in development is enjoyed by White's king side pawns and White's king.

Jan-17-17  Atking: A remarkable strategical performance. How Carlsen could be so sure about his pawn formation after 13.g4? Of course the move speaks itself put the Bishop outside But drawback are there, weakness on f and h3. Wei Yi didn't play badly, quite the opposite, however curtains around move 30. A kind of Capa gems.
Jan-17-17  Atking: Waiting for ideas on Wei Yi side to understand what happen here. 14...Ng5 looks logical but I will not put out a Bronstein like h6 Bh7 Kh8 f6 Rf7 Bf8 g6 Bg7 then f5. 18...exd isn't the best Chinese wine but already White has a small edge.
Jan-17-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: GOTD title suggestion:

"Prepare Yi The... Wait!?"

Just <tga> riffing:

Wei Yi vs L Bruzon Batista, 2015

Jan-17-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: Typical <MC> in his Championship Reign (and run up to it).

1. Modest opening with no real attempt to gain advantage? <check!>

2. Middlegame where he doesn't care if queens are exchanged, or other pieces either? <check!>

3. Materially equal endgame with small theoretical advantage? <check!>

4. Converting small theoretical advantage into convincing win against GM? <check!>

Jan-17-17  ColeTrane: Thinking, "...go ahead and put that knight on e4 see what happens...." since playing Qc1....
Jan-18-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark:

<Magnus Carlsen> analyzes his win with Yasser Seirawan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cl0...

Analysis with <Peter Svidler>: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Cr...

<Daniel ♔> analyses the game: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ST...

Enjoy!

Jan-18-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <thegoodanarchist> Good summary! The question is: how does he so smoothly transition from 1 to 3? He simply outplays most GMs out there with what (in retrospect) look like simple, straightforward plans/moves. In that sense, he reminds me of Fischer, albeit their styles are different. In a given Fischer position, I'd think "and now what? What should he do?" Then I look at the subsequent moves and it feels like "of course! So straightforward!" I get the same feeling from many of Carlsen's games.
Jan-18-17  Ulhumbrus: < Fusilli: <thegoodanarchist> Good summary! The question is: how does he so smoothly transition from 1 to 3? He simply outplays most GMs out there with what (in retrospect) look like simple, straightforward plans/moves. In that sense, he reminds me of Fischer, albeit their styles are different. In a given Fischer position, I'd think "and now what? What should he do?" Then I look at the subsequent moves and it feels like "of course! So straightforward!" I get the same feeling from many of Carlsen's games.> One explanation is the saying <An expert makes it look easy>
Jan-18-17  fisayo123: Wei Yi had a big oppurtunity to play a Sicilian Najdorf against the champ but turned it down in favour of something passive, which plays to Carlsen's strengths.
Jan-18-17  Atking: <whiteshark> thanks. All these 3 are very instructive!
Jan-18-17  Grbasowski: Why not 33. ... Nc3?
Jan-19-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <Grbasowski: Why not 33. ... Nc3?>

As Carlsen showed in his analysis with Seirawan, 34.Nxc3 bxc3 35.Rd3 and black's position is hopeless. Carlsen acknowledged that Wei didn't have to resign yet, but the game is won by white at that point anyway.

Jan-20-17  yurikvelo: game multiPV:
http://pastebin.com/WpyKKMwA

<Grbasowski: Why not 33. ... Nc3?> after 30. ... c5?? nothing can save black

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Bishop's Opening: Berlin Def (C24) 1-0 Gain space, no foul ups
from cd6 Qc7/Qa5 by fredthebear
extras enlist Fredthebear as a spare
by fredthebear
Wei To Go
from The Carlsen Chronicles Part I - Wonderboy by MoonlitKnight
Middle game
from Italian Game Bc4 Nf6 by ISeth
King Carlsen
by Zhbugnoimt


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC