Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Maxime Vachier-Lagrave vs Wesley So
Grand Chess Tour Paris (Blitz) (2018) (blitz), Paris FRA, rd 10, Jun-24
Italian Game: Classical Variation. Giuoco Pianissimo (C53)  ·  0-1



Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 102 more Vachier-Lagrave/So games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Help with kibitzing features can be found on our Kibtizing Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-24-18  paladintanks: Nice endgame even in blitz time control
Premium Chessgames Member
  saffuna: Question: Once it's down to the bishop endgame, how much would be analysis and how much is technique studied and mastered by GMs? In other words, how much thinking and how much memory?
Jun-24-18  reindeergm1: I believe it was technique. So had a protected passed pawn on e-file and queen-side majority. The strategy is simply to sacrifice the e pawn while the King gobbles up the queen-side.

I'm not saying it's an easy win for Black, but it's certainly not an easy journey for White to find best moves under such pressure.

Maybe 50% technique 50% psychology?

Jun-24-18  Sally Simpson: Technique and at this speed it will not be exact technique.

Wes knew he had to kept the h7 pawn on the pawn board so he has the correct Bishop for h1. the best place to do was Bg6 stopping h5 and g6 ideas.

The Bishop went there on move 46 and stayed there. (Note it also cut off the White King from reaching the Kingside.

Then the Black King nursed home the Queenside pawns.

If it had not been a rapid game I think MVL would have resigned sooner.

Premium Chessgames Member
  saffuna: Thanks to both.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Korora: <If it had not been a rapid [sic] game I think MVL would have resigned sooner.> Since it's a blitz game, were I MVL's place I might have held out in hope of a stalemate blunder.

Then again, I'm such a patzer that in MVL's place I'd have either been checkmated or else toppled my ♔ after massive material loss by move 15.

Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <<saffuna> Once it's down to the bishop endgame, how much would be analysis and how much is technique studied and mastered by GMs?>

If by analysis you mean OTB calculation then I think that you'll agree that there is less of an opportunity to do deep calculations/analysis at fast (rapid, blitz) time controls than at classic time controls, unless one or both players at the classic time control are in time trouble. Therefore, usually, I would think that the top players would rely more on technique and less on OTB analysis/calculations at the faster time controls than at the classic time control.

Technique is the application of a skill developed through study and experience, plus learning and memorization (e.g. achieving a Lucena position). So I would say that in this and other endgames at faster time controls the top players rely more on technique than calculation; the players simply don't have enough time to do a complete analysis of complicated endgames.

Having said that, it's obvious even to me that after 19...a4 White Pb5 and Pb2 are not easily defended given Black's control of the light squares around them. So Black's winning "technique" would first start with winning that pawn, and for Black to this (a) either Black's bishop must be placed in the a4-e8 diagonal or his rook on a5, (b) White's rook must be prevented from establishing an outpost on e5 defending the Pb5, and (c) White's Nd4 must be chased away so it can't defend the Pb5. Then it is a question of the calculations needed to make that happen, something that So accomplishes in moves 20 – 34, after which the Pb5 is doomed.

After that the issue is whether a single pawn advantage in this BOC endgame is winnable for Black. The knight exchange, usually not desired when you're down in material, is practically forced since otherwise White's bishop is tied to the defense of the Pb2 forevermore. Then the technique for Black is just a question of marching his king to the q-side to attack, or threaten to attack, the Pb2. To do that, the Black pawns must be placed on light squares where they cannot be attacked by White's DSB, and Black's bishop must keep White's king away from the q-side and hold back White's k-side pawn majority, something that So accomplishes by 46...Bg6+.

Black can then get a 3:1 q-side majority by force even if it means giving up his Pe5. After that it's only a question of advancing the a-side pawns until he obtains 2 passed pawns, and So accomplishes this by 53...c3+. Note that Black would win even if White had marched his king to g4 since Black could give up his bishop after h4-h5 ...(any) hxg6 ...hxg6 since it would take White a long time to capture Black's Pg6 and long before that White would have had to give up his bishop to prevent one of Black's pawns from queening.

So I would say that this endgame is almost all technique and the only analysis/calculation needed would have been to avoid a gross blunder such as giving up his bishop without compensation. Of course, this is just one example, but I would think that, in general, at the faster time controls top GMs rely much more on technique than analysis/calculations. Then again, I'm not a top level GM so I wouldn't really know. Best to ask So directly; send him an email with your question and see if he responds.

Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: These Giuoco Pianissimo lines with an early ... d5 run the risk of undermining the Pe5, but Black is for choice after 7. exd5 Nxd5 Opening Explorer usually meeting 8. Re1 with 8 ... Bg4.

Black had single-minded focus on winning the Pb5, then converted the BOOC ending very nicely.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: BLITZ. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
More endgame Pawn play
from The Soul of Chess by Miguel Medina
More endgame Pawn play
from The Soul of Chess by Miguel Medina
from Special Fast Eddie Collection B0 [BLACK] by chess.master
More endgame Pawn play
from The Soul of Chess by Korora

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC