chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Dommaraju Gukesh vs Ding Liren
Tata Steel Masters (2024), Wijk aan Zee NED, rd 3, Jan-15
Italian Game: Classical Variation. Giuoco Pianissimo (C53)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 18 more D Gukesh/Ding Liren games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can make these tips go away by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Simply check the option "Don't show random tips on game pages." and click the Update Profile button at the bottom.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-15-24  goodevans: Gukesh sac'd a pawn and got little in return.

Ding regrouped quickly and then came the onslaught. The speed at which Ding totally destroyed the White position was breathtaking.

Jan-15-24  BxChess: Yes. It was a demolition at the end. Gukesh aimed for the queen side pawns while Ding aimed for the king.
Jan-15-24  dehanne: A bitter disappointment.
Jan-15-24  cormier: depth=34 | Stockfish 16
-1.18 19... Qg7 20. Qb5 Nxg3 21. fxg3 Nb4 22. Nf5 c6 23. Ne7+ Kh8 24. Qh5 Bd7 25. Nf5 Bxf5 26. Qxf5 d5 27. Bd3 Rae8 28. Rde2 Rxe2 29. Rxe2 Qg5+ 30. Kd1 Nxd3 31. Qxd3 Qh5 32. Qb3 Qxh2 33. Qxb7 Kg7 34. Qxc6 Qh1+ 35. Kc2 Qf1 36. Rd2 Qf5+ 37. Kb3 Qb1 38. Qxd5 Re8 39. Qxa5 Re3+ 40. Kb4 Qe1 41. Kb5 Rb3+ 42. Kc6 Rxb2

-0.75 19... Bd7 20. Bd3 Qg7 21. Bf5 Rae8 22. Re3 Bxf5 23. Nxf5 Qg6 24. Qxb7 Nb4 25. Qb5 c6 26. Qxa5 Nd5 27. Rxe8 Rxe8 28. Ne3 Nxe3 29. fxe3 Nxg3 30. hxg3 Rxe3 31. Qa8+ Kg7 32. Qxc6 h5 33. Qc2 Qg5 34. Kb1 Qd5 35. Rd3 Re1+ 36. Rd1 Rxd1+ 37. Qxd1 Qxg2 38. Qc1 Qe4+ 39. Ka2 Qd5+ 40. Ka1 h4 41. Qf4

-0.73 19... Nxg3 20. Qxg3 Qg7 21. f3 Bd7 22. Bb5 Rae8 23. Rxe8 Rxe8 24. d5 Ne5 25. Bxd7 Nxd7 26. Nf5 Qf6 27. Nxh6+ Qxh6 28. Qxg4+ Qg6 29. Qxd7 Re1+ 30. Rd1 Qg5+ 31. Kc2 Qxg2+ 32. Rd2 Qg1 33. Qg4+ Qxg4 34. fxg4 Re4 35. Kd3 Rxg4 36. Rc2 Rxa4 37. Rxc7 Rb4 38. Rd7 Rxb2 39. Rxd6 Kg7 40. Kc3 Rb5 Giuoco Piano Game: Main Line, Giuoco Pianissimo Variation

Jan-15-24  cormier: depth=42 | Stockfish 16
0.00 19. Bd3 Qg7 20. Ng6 Nxg3 21. Nxf8 Kxf8 22. fxg3 Nxd4 23. Qd5 Qg5+ 24. Qxg5 hxg5 25. Bb5 Nc6 26. Rd5 Ne5 27. Rexe5 dxe5 28. Rd8+ Ke7 29. Re8+ Kd6 30. Rd8+
Jan-15-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Ding chipping in with a Black win tally in this event.

This win would have cheered him up. Hopefully a couple more and he can win this and we can finally forget about old whats his name...that Danish lad, no, he might be Norwegian...him that is good at blitz.

Jan-16-24  whiteshark: security concerns
Jan-16-24  Atking: <dehanne: A bitter disappointment.> Indeed. 13.0-0-0 was very ambitious but then 15.Nfxd4 as 16.f3 keeps the pawn, should have been home preparation. If 15...Qxe4 16.Nxd6! Or 15...NxN 16.NxN Qxe4 17.Bxd6!
Jan-16-24  SkySports: The Return of the Ding!
Jan-16-24  ex0duz: Gukesh sacced a pawn but Ding called his bluff and took it. Then Ding sacced a pawn of his own but Gukesh refused to take it. Then few moves later he took it but that turned out to be a poisoned pawn and Ding crushed him shortly after that with great attacking moves. Nice to see Ding playing confident and fast chess, he had like 45 mins still by the end of the game while Gukesh had 5 mins. So it wasn't some time trouble blunder either for Gukesh, he just got out played hard and a little advantage turned into a crushing one over the course of a few moves.

When Ding is on, he's on and I think he plays better attacking chess than Carlsen even.

Apr-22-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <Gukesh sacced a pawn but Ding called his bluff and took it. Then Ding sacced a pawn of his own ... that turned out to be a poisoned pawn>

Gukesh sacked a pawn as part of his overall strategy to keep the initiative. Later, for Gukesh the problem was not that the b7 pawn was poisoned, but that Ding managed to end up with a superior minor piece. His knight is so much better than Gukesh's bishop. And the pawn structure favored the maximization of the power of Ding's knight. Ding ended up with a winning attack as a result of his positional superiority.

Apr-25-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  chrisowen: Dong battle x
Um I ft ball x
Oct-01-24  ex0duz: <Fusilli: Gukesh sacked a pawn as part of his overall strategy to keep the initiative. Later, for Gukesh the problem was not that the b7 pawn was poisoned, but that Ding managed to end up with a superior minor piece. His knight is so much better than Gukesh's bishop. And the pawn structure favored the maximization of the power of Ding's knight. Ding ended up with a winning attack as a result of his positional superiority.>

Oh don't get me wrong, I agree with your general assessment of the game and that Ding obviously had a superior position on the board(to state the obvious lol) and that the knight was much more useful than Whites bishop by the end of the game. That is obviously undeniable, but that is also in hindsight. My point however was that white going pawn snatching(ie taking the poisoned pawn) and using 2 tempo to do so while black went king hunting also played a massive part in the result. To me this was a game of tempi, and blacks gradual accumulation of free tempi which allowed him to get a better position as you said, and ultimately pull off his attack first.

Whites first mistake and loss of tempo was 16.Rd2. After that engine gives like -0.7. But that is not really game ending in itself and just an inaccuracy. Ding then offers his own pawn on b7 with 22.Qg5. Gukesh refused to take it like I said, instead choosing to play 23.Qb5 and defend his knight. This was Gukesh/White's second mistake, and the eval goes from -0.7 to around -1.4. I guess you could count this as a loss of tempo since white could have used that tempo and taken a pawn, but at least its defending the Knight on f4 so ill let it slide as just another inaccuracy.

Now things are starting to get serious. Half a pawn(-0.7) is still manageable or drawable in many games, but a pawn and a half(-1.4) is probably going to end with a loss most of the time.

So 22.Qg5 is <"Ding sacced a pawn of his own".>

As for the <"Then few moves later he took it but that turned out to be a poisoned pawn and Ding crushed him shortly after that with great attacking move">

I was referring to Gukesh refusing to take it on move 22 when it was actually the best move and still -0.7 after taking, but instead Gukesh decided to take it on move 28 with 28.Qxb7, by which time the "ripe fruit" had already gone off and became a "poisoned pawn" hah.

Yes, whites position was already quite difficulty to play by that point and the engine gives a -2.0 eval after the recommended 28.Bf4 instead of pawn snatching.

But he indeed goes for the poisoned pawn with 28.Qxb7, and it now gives an eval of -2.6. But even without the eval, we can just try to assess the logic behind the move. By taking that pawn, Gukesh basically gives Ding 2 free moves.

First 28.Qxb7 gives Ding a free 28.Re8, and then after Gukesh plays 30.Qb5, moving his queen back to the exact same square before he snatched the pawn, he allows Ding a free 30.Na2+, leading to a forced line where black checks whites king and allows the knight and queen to infiltrate the squares around whites king, and also with the Re8 cutting off any potential escape routes for the white king.

These two tempo literally allowed Ding to turn what was "just" a -2.0 positional advantage into a crushing attack with all Dings pieces coming into play. After the forced checks and 32.Qg1, engine gives -3.5, and it was here where Gukesh blunders in a hopeless position with the move 33.Kd3.(-7 after).

Ultimately in my opinion this game was less about positional domination, and more about who had the faster attack which is usually the theme in games with opposite sided castling. White wasted at least 3 tempo, first with 16.Rd2 then 28.Qxb7, and then 30.Qb5. in this type of opposite side castling game where both sides are attacking each other's king, one tempo is huge, let alone 3. Gukesh going pawn grabbing on b7(especially after he refused it few moves earlier when it was THE best move) was not logical and in the end he paid the price for being indecisive, illogical, and wasting too many tempo on useless moves. He also sacced a pawn to gain a tempo on the queen with moves like 18.RHe1, opening the center, but in the end it's black who controls the E file with his rook while white has his confused rook on d2 still not knowing what it's doing there, and if anything gets in the way during the game and would be better placed on the back rank to stop blacks queen from infiltrating it with check near the end.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC