The lame editor perfidubious thinks he's a genius but provides us absolutely nothing. His personal attacks go on and on and on for years, decades, in complete violation of the CG guidelines. It's either useless cyberbully drivel just to run up pud's posting totals, and/or crass personal attacks on other members to feed Al's narcissism.

<<<When The Pawn.... >

by Fiona Apple>

When the Pawn Hits the Conflicts
He Thinks Like a King.
What He Knows Throws the Blows
When He Goes to the Fight
and He'll Win the Whole Thing
'Fore He Enters the Ring.
There's No Body to Batter
When Your Mind Is Your Might!
So When You Go Solo,
You Hold Your Own Hand
and Remember That Depth
Is the Greatest of Heights.
And if You Know Where You Stand,
Then You Know Where to Land
And if You Fall It Won't Matter,
'Cuz You'll Know That You're Right!>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_the_Pawn...

Hodgson vs F Hellers, 1994

So let's understand "When the Pawn..."

Stockfish preferred 6...cxd4 w/a threat of a second capture followed by the fundamentally sound developing move 7...Nc6.

Instead 6...exd4?! allows 7.d5 preventing ...Nc6. Black's queenside knight ends up rotting away on Na6.

'Factually' to the extent that Hodgson sacrificed both exchanges, but the post was--as you have been known to state--'lazy and rather effortless' while managing to impart no insightful content.

We are all well aware of your struggles beyond spelling out mates in two, but to criticise anyone who has actually been there and done that merely points up your lack of chess education.

<....The lame editor perfidubious thinks he's a genius but provides us absolutely nothing....>

The world continues to see that FACTS (would you prefer that FTB post lies and insults like you ? ? ?) don't matter whatsoever for our habitual liar editor who is proud to be deceitful and untrustworthy.